The Variations of the King’s Gambit

Here’s a zip-through the main lines of the King’s Gambit, using complete games. I have tried where possible to use games from Joe Gallagher’s popular book.

Play through games here:
x/pgn4web/collection.html?pgnfile=x/pgn/booklets.pgn?initialGame=115

  There are three basic classes of defence:

 

  • accept the Pawn

 

  • counter-gambit

 

  • get on with development

 


Accept the Pawn

Steinitz always said that the best way to refute a gambit is to accept it, and accepting the Gambit is probably the most popular response at all levels. Steinitz would hang on to Pawns with total commitment, but the pragmatic Lasker advised letting your opponent waste time and effort getting it back, when you may have material equality but a superior position.

  Because of the check at h4, White normally plays 3. Nf3, but there are some alternatives.


King’s Bishop’s Gambit

Polgar,J – Flear,C [C33] Hastings/SW,11,22,/1989

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nf6

After 3…d5 the Polgars have been playing 4. exd5, getting into a line of the Modern Defence.

4. d3

 

rnbqkb-r

pppp-ppp
-----n--
--------
--B-Pp--
---P----
PPP---PP
RNBQK-NR
This modest move intends to reach a playable middlegame with an extra central Pawn. Black is objectively equal but can be outplayed.

4… d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nf3 Nb6 7. Bb3 Bd6 8. Qe2+ Qe7 9. Nc3 Bg4 10. Qxe7+ Kxe7 11. Ne4 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Nc6 13. Nxd6 cxd6 14. Bxf4 Nd4 15. Kf2 Nxb3 16. axb3 a6 17. Ra5 Kd7 18. b4 Rhe8 19. c4 Re6 20. b5 axb5 21. Rxb5 Kc6 22. Rc1 Ra2

 

--------

-p---ppp
-nkpr---
-R------
--P--B--
---P-P--
rP---K-P
--R-----
23. Rb3 Nd7 24. d4 Rf6 25. Bg3 b6 26. Re1 d5 27. cxd5+ Kxd5 28. Re7 Kc4 29. Rc3+ Kb4 30. Rc2 Kb3 31. Rd2 Ra7 32. d5 b5 33. d6 Rf5 34. Rd3+ Kc2 35. Rc3+ Kxb2 36. Rc7 1-0

 


King’s Knight’s Gambit

Again, there is a basic choice of strategy:

  hang on to the Pawn (Kieseritsky Variation (3…g5), Becker Variation (3…h6))

  central counter (Modern Defence (3…d5))

  get on with development (Schallop Defence (3…Nf6), Defence with 3…Nc6, Cunningham Variation (3…Be7))


Kieseritsky Variation (3…g5)

Holmes,D – Hebden,Mark [C39] British/Championship, 1989

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4

The alternative 4. Bc4 leads most often to the Hanstein variation, which JG reckons is no winning attempt after e.g.

Groeneveld K – Jerabek P (corres TT/88\3, 1991): 1.e4/e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 Bg7 5.h4 h6 6.d4 d6 7.c3 Nc6 8.0-0 Bg4 9.Qb3 Na5 10.Bxf7+ Kf8 11.Qa3 Kxf7 12.Qxa5 Bxf3 13.Rxf3 c5 = (Hoi) 14.Qxd8 Rxd8 15.d5 Be5 16.g3 g4 17.Rf1 f3 18.Bf4 Bxf4 0-1

Oddly, BCO2 gives the archaic Double Muzio Gambit the nod e.g.

Shirov,A – Lapinski,J: Daugavpils, 1990: 1.e4 e5 2.f4/exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4 5.0-0 gxf3 6.Qxf3 Qf6 7.e5 Qxe5 8.Bxf7+ Kxf7 9.d4 Qxd4+ [9…Qf5]10.Be3 Qf6 11.Bxf4 Ke8 12.Nc3 Nc6 13.Nd5 Qg6 14.Rae1+ Be7 15.Bd6 Kd8 16.Qf8+ Bxf8 17.Bxc7# 1-0

4…g4

5. Ne5

  The Allgaier gambit

5. Ng5 h6 6. Nxf7

  is a brave but probably insufficient try; the idea though is sound in other positions (see 3…h6).

Terry – Barlow B (corres GBR, 1988)

/

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ng5 h6 6.Nxf7 Kxf7 7.Nc3 d6 8.Bc4+ Kg7 9.d4 Be7 10.Bxf4 Bxh4+ 11.g3 Bg5 12.Qd2 Bxf4 13.gxf4 Bd7 14.0-0-0 a5 15.f5 Be8 16.Nd5 Nd7 17.e5 Ra6 18.Nf4 1-0

  White gets good practical chances in any event; the line reminds me of Cochrane’s line in the Petroff. (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nxf7).

5…Nf6 6. d4 d6 7. Nd3 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 Qe7 9. Qe2 Nc6 10. c3 Bf5

 

r---kb-r

ppp-qp-p
--np----
-----b--
---PnBpP
--PN----
PP--Q-P-
RN--KB-R
This is the critical line of the Kieseritsky. Black does not stand badly and the most that JG claims for White here is that Black will find it difficult to win after 13. Nxe4 (!). The main game is widely cited as the antidote to White’s plans. I offer some recent experiences as a starting point for folk who hope to win as White with it.

11. Nd2 O-O-O

[11… Nxd2 12. Kxd2 h5 13. Bg5 Bh6 14. Bxh6 Qxe2+ 15. Bxe2 Q-Q Vockler M – Sobeck G/corres DDR/BRD 1972/(25)]

12. O-O-O

[12. Nc4 h5 13. Ne3 Bg6 14. O-O-O Bh6 15. Bxh6 Rxh6 16. Nd5 Qf8 17. Qe3 Re8 18. Qf4 Nd8 0-1 Wittmann W – Rodin E/corres/ARG 1980]

[12. Nxe4 Qxe4 13. Qxe4 Bxe4 14. Nf2 Re8

[14… f5 15. Nxe4 fxe4 16. h5 Be7 17. Kf2 Rdf8 18. Kg3 d5 19. Be2 Rhg8 0-1 Schmelz – Hanison/corres CIF 1990/(27)]

15. Kd2 f5 16. Nxe4 Rxe4 17. g3 Ne7 18. Bd3 Re6 19. Rae1 Kd7 Q-Q Bangiev A – Neumann G/corres USSR 1989 (26)]

/

12… Re8 13. Re1

[13. g3 Nxc3 14. Qxe7 Nxa2+ 15. Kb1 Rxe7 16. Kxa2 Bxd3 17. Bxd3 Nb4+ 18. Kb3 Nxd3 0-1 Hajek – Buresh/cr/1961]

[13. Nc4 Qf6 14. Ne3 Bh6 15. Qe1 g3 16. Nd5 Qg7 17. Qe3 Bxf4 18. Qxf4 Bg4 19. Re1 f5 0-1 Skotorenko V – Reprinuev/corres ARG 1983 (44)]

[13. h5 Nxc3 0-1 Pantaleoni L – Bonatti A/corres/ITA/CSA 1983]

[13. d5 Nxc3 14. Qxe7 Nxa2+

[14… Nxe7 15. bxc3 Nxd5 16. c4 Nc3 17. Re1 Rxe1+ 18. Nxe1 Nxa2+ 19. Kb2 Nb4 0-1 Craig T – Ivanez Rico F/corres EUR/1991 (40)]

15. Kb1 Nxe7 16. Kxa2 Nxd5 0-1 Hurt,E – Baca,D/cr/1987]

[13. Nxe4! = Qxe4 14. Qd2

[14. Qxe4 Rxe4 15. g3 Bg7 16. Bd2 Re7 17. Nf4 Be4 18. Bg2 f5 19. Rde1 Rhe8 20. Re2 Bh6 21. Bxe4 Rxe4 22. Rxe4 Rxe4 23. Nd5 Bxd2+ 24. Kxd2 Nxd4 0-1 McLean – Hindle/corres GBR/1990]

14… Bg7 15. h5 h6 16. Rh2 Qd5 17. Kb1 b5 18. Ka1 a5 19. g3 Be4 … 1-0 Pablo – Gilg,J/Tarrassa (2) 1989 (42)]

/

13… Qe6 14. a3 Qa2 15. Qd1

[15. g3 Bg7 16. Nxe4 Rxe4 17. Qxe4 Bxe4 18. Rxe4 Qb3 19. Rh2 a5 0-1 Maes W – Winants L/Huy op 1992 (38)]

/

15… h5 16. g3

[16. Qb3 Qa1+ 17. Nb1 Be7 18. Qd5 Bg6 19. Rxe4 Bd8 0-1 Carroll C – Curnow D/corres GBR 1989 (35)]

/

16… Bg7 17. Rh2 Nxc3 18. bxc3 Qxa3+ 19. Kc2 Bxd4 20. Qa1 Nb4+ 0-1

 


Becker Variation (3…h6)

Vrenegoor T – Van Gisbergen S [C34] Enschede,/1991

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 h6

  Black signals an intention to hang on to the Pawn with …g5 and …Bg7.

4. d4 g5 5. Nc3 d6 6. g3 fxg3 7. h4 g4 8. Ng1 g2 9. Bxg2 Be7 10. h5 Bh4+ 11. Ke2 Bg5 12. Bxg5 Qxg5 13. Qd2 Qxd2+ 14. Kxd2 Ne7 15. Nge2+/=

 

rnb-k--r

ppp-np--
---p---p
-------P
---PP-p-
--N-----
PPPKN-B-
R------R
better for White, says Korchnoi, but…

15… Na6 16. Rhf1 O-O 17. Rae1 Kg7 18. Nf4 c6 19. Rg1 Rg8 20. Bf1 Nc7 21. Be2 Kf8 22. Rg2 d5 23. Rf1 Bd7 24. e5 Rg5 25. Rfg1 Ne6 26. Nxe6+ Bxe6 27. Bxg4 Bxg4 28. Rxg4 Rxh5 29. Ne2 Rh2 30. Rf4 Re8 31. Rgf1 f5 32. exf6 Rxe2+ 33. Kxe2 Ng6+ 34. Kd3 Nxf4+ 35. Rxf4 Kf7 36. c4 dxc4+ 37. Kxc4 Re2 38. Kc3 Re6 39. d5 cxd5 40. Rf5 Rxf6 41. Rxd5 Kg6 42. Rd7 Rf7 43. Rd6+ Kg5 44. Rd5+ Kg4 45. Rd1 Rc7+ 0-1

 

Bangiev A – Karolyi T [C34] Kecskemet,/1987

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 h6 4. b3

 

rnbqkbnr

pppp-pp-
-------p
--------
----Pp--
-P---N--
P-PP--PP
RNBQKB-R
A recently popular counter, which meets no effective opposition in this game.

4… d6 5. Bb2 Nf6 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. Qe2 Be7 8. O-O-O O-O

 

r-bq-rk-

ppp-bpp-
--np-n-p
--------
----Pp--
-PN--N--
PBPPQ-PP
--KR-B-R
9. g3 Bg4 10. Qf2 Ne5 11. Be2 fxg3 12. Qxg3 Nh5 13. Qf2 Bxf3 14. Bxf3 Bh4 15. Qf1 Nf4 16. Rg1 c6 17. Bg4 Nfg6 18. Bf5 Bg5 19. Kb1 Ne7 20. d4 N5g6 21. Bc1 Bxc1 22. Kxc1 d5 23. e5 Nxf5 24. Qxf5 Ne7 25. Qg4 g6 26. Rdf1 Qc8 27. Qh4 Nf5 28. Qf6 Kh7 29. Ne2

 

r-q--r--

pp---p-k
--p--Qpp
---pPn--
---P----
-P------
P-P-N--P
--K--RR-
29… Qe6 30. Rxg6 Qxf6 31. Rxf6 Ng7 32. Rxf7 Kg8 33. Rxf8+ Rxf8 34. Rxf8+ Kxf8 35. Kd2 Ne6 36. Ke3 Kf7 37. c4 Nc7 38. Nf4 b5 39. Kd3 a5 40. cxd5 cxd5 41. a4 b4 42. Ke3 Ke8 43. Nd3 Ne6 44. Nc5 Nd8 45. Nd3 Nc6 46. Nf4 Ne7 47. Ne2 Kf7 48. Kf4 Kg6 49. Ng1 Nc6 50. Nf3 Kf7 51. Kf5 Ne7+ 52. Kg4 Ke6 53. Nh4 Nc8 54. Nf5 Nb6 55. Nd6 Nd7 56. Nb5 Nb8 57. Kf4 Nc6 58. h4 Ne7 59. Nd6 Nc6 60. Nf5 h5 61. Kg5 Nxe5 62. Ng7+ Kd6 63. dxe5+ Kxe5 64. Nxh5 Kd4 65. Nf4 Kc3 66. h5 Kxb3 67. h6 Ka2 68. h7 b3 69. Nd3 1-0


Modern Defence (3…d5)

Long thought an effective reply, but I sense players of Black are finding this less promising than other lines. White has two Bishop moves at move 5, and JG claims both are good.

Kinlay,J – Nunn,J [C36] London,/1977

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. Bb5+ c6 6. dxc6 Nxc6 7. d4 Bd6 8. O-O O-O 9. Nbd2 Bg4 10. c3 Bc7 11. Nc4 Ne7 12. Ba4 b5 13. Bxb5 Qd5 14. Na3 Qh5

 

r----rk-

p-b-nppp
-----n--
-B-----q
---P-pb-
N-P--N--
PP----PP
R-BQ-RK-
Nunn is so dangerous with the attack.

15. Bd3 Ned5 16. Nc4 Rae8 17. h3 Ne3 18. Bxe3 fxe3 19. hxg4 Nxg4 20. Nce5 Rxe5 21. dxe5 e2 22. Bxe2 Bb6+ 23. Qd4 Qh6 24. Rae1 Rd8 25. Bc4 Rxd4 0-1

 

Hebden M – Geller E [C36] Moscow,/1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 exf4 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nxd5 6. O-O Be6 7. Bb3 Be7 8. c4 Nb6 9. d4 Nxc4

 

rn-qk--r

ppp-bppp
----b---
--------
--nP-p--
-B---N--
PP----PP
RNBQ-RK-
10. Bxf4 O-O 11. Qe2 b5 12. Nc3 a6 13. a4 Nc6 14. axb5 Nxd4 15. Nxd4 Qxd4+ 16. Kh1 Rab8 17. Rxa6 Bd6 18. Ra4 Bxf4 19. Bxc4 Qd6 20. Rd1 Qe5 21. Bxe6 fxe6 22. Re4 Qg5 23. g3 Bd6 24. Rxe6 Qf5 25. Kg2 Bc5 26. Rd5 Qf2+ 27. Qxf2 Rxf2+ 28. Kh3 Bd6 29. Re2 Rxe2 30. Nxe2

 

-r----k-

--p---pp
---b----
-P-R----
--------
------PK
-P--N--P
--------
Better for White, but in the end Hebden was struggling to draw.

30… Re8 31. Nc3 Re6 32. Kg2 Kf7 33. Rf5+ Kg6 34. g4 Re3 35. Rh5 h6 36. Kf2 Rd3 37. Ke2 Rd4 38. h3 Rb4 39. Nd1 Kf6 40. Kd3 Be5 41. Nc3 Rxb2 42. Ne4+ Ke6 43. g5 g6 44. Rxh6 Kf5 45. Rh7 Rxb5 46. Rf7+ Ke6 47. Rh7 Rd5+ 48. Ke3 Ra5 49. Kd3 Ra3+ 50. Kc4 Kf5 51. Nc5 Rc3+ 52. Kb4 Rc1 53. Nd7 Bg3 54. Nf6 Rb1+ 55. Kc4 Rh1 56. Kd3 Be5 57. Ng4 Bg3 58. Nf6 Ra1 59. h4 Ra3+ 60. Ke2 Ra4 61. Rf7 Bh2 62. Kf3 Rf4+ 63. Kg2 Rxh4 64. Nh7+ Kg4 65. Nf8 Bd6 66. Nxg6 Rh2+ 67. Kf1 Kxg5 68. Ne7 Rd2 69. Nf5 Bf4 70. Ng7 Q


Schallop Defence (3…Nf6)

An unpopular line, but the games aren’t always as one-sided as this one!

Bangiev A – Podrezov [C34] corres ARG,/1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e5 Nh5 5. d4 d5 6. c4 g5 7. g4 Ng7 8. Nc3 Bb4 9. Rg1 h5 10. h3 dxc4 11. Bxc4 c5 12. d5 Nd7 13. Bd2 Nb6 14. Qe2 hxg4 15. hxg4 Bd7 16. a3 Ba5 17. Ne4 Bxd2+ 18. Nfxd2 Qe7 19. d6

 

r---k--r

pp-bqpn-
-n-P----
--p-P-p-
--B-NpP-
P-------
-P-NQ---
R---K-R-
1-0

 


Defence with 3…Nc6

Not a popular line – I could find no games in my database, although/this may be because after 4. Nc3 we are in a line of the Vienna Gambit.

Gallagher,J – Hresc,Vladimir [C34] Gent/ (07), 1991

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Nc3 g5 5.h4 g4 6.Ng5 h6 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 8.d4 f3 9.Bc4+ d5 10.Bxd5+ Kg7 11.gxf3 Bb4 12.Be3 Nf6 13.Bc4 Qe7 14.Qe2 gxf3 15.Qxf3 Bg4 16.Rg1 h5 17.e5 Nxe5 18.dxe5 Qxe5 19.0-0-0 Bc5 20.Rd7+ Nxd7 21.Qf7# 1-0

 


Cunningham Variation (3…Be7)

This venerable line is considered a safe way to play for equality.

IbbencanCoRqoBaM1FeRNaNqezGaRciak[C35]banPabman,1987

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Be7 4. Bc4 Nf6! 5. e5 Ng4 6. O-O Nc6 7. d4 d5 8. exd6 Bxd6

[8…Qxd6 is always the alternative]

9. Qe1+

 

r-bqk--r

ppp--ppp
--nb----
--------
--BP-pn-
-----N--
PPP---PP
RNB-QRK-
9… Kf8 10. Nc3 Bf5 11. Nh4 Qg5 12. Nxf5 Qxf5 13. Qe4 Qxe4 14. Nxe4 Rd8 15. c3 Na5 16. Nxd6 Rxd6 17. Be2 Ne3 18. Rxf4 Re6 19. Bf3 c6 20. b3 Nd5

 

-----k-r

pp---ppp
--p-r---
n--n----
---P-R--
-PP--B--
P-----PP
R-B---K-
21. Ba3+ Kg8 22. Bxd5 cxd5 23. Rf5 Ra6 24. Rxd5 g6 25. Rd7 Nc6 26. Bb2 1-0

 


Fischer Defence (3…d6)

This move was Fischer’s famous “bust”, hatched after a stinging defeat by Spassky. He describes it as a “high-class waiting move”. After some peculiar digressions, players of White have settled on a fair strategy with 4. d4/ 5. h4, although JG suggests an intertesting alternative with 4. Bc4/5. d3.

Gallagher J – Jackson S [C34] GBR-ch/Blackpool, 1988

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 g5 5. h4 g4 6. Ng1 Bh6 7. Nc3 c6 8. Nge2 Qf6 9. g3 f3 10. Nf4 Qe7 11. Bd3 Bg7 12. Be3 h5 13. Qd2 Nd7 14. O-O-O

 

r-b-k-nr

pp-nqpb-
--pp----
-------p
---PPNpP
--NBBpP-
PPPQ----
--KR---R
This is one of those peculiar positions that make the Gambit difficult to get a feel for. Black can make no use of the protected passed Pawn on the sixth(!).

14… Nf8 15. Rhe1 Bd7 16. e5 dxe5 17. dxe5 Ne6 18. Ne4

 

r---k-nr

pp-bqpb-
--p-n---
----P--p
----NNpP
---BBpP-
PPPQ----
--KRR---
White obedience to the principle of centralisation is striking.

18… Bxe5 19. Nxe6 Bxe6 20. Bc5 Qc7 21. Nd6+! Bxd6 22. Rxe6+ Be7 23. Bd6 Qxd6 24. Rxd6 Bxd6

 

r---k-nr

pp---p--
--pb----
-------p
------pP
---B-pP-
PPPQ----
--KR----
25. Ba6 O-O-O 26. Qc3 Ne7 27. Rxd6 bxa6 28. Rf6 Rhf8 29. Qc5 Rd7 30. Qxh5 Rfd8 31. Qxg4 Kb7 32. Qxf3 Nd5 33. Rxf7 Nb6 34. b3 a5 35. h5 a4 36. Kb2 axb3 37. axb3 a5 38. h6 a4 39. h7 axb3 40. cxb3 Ka7 41. Rxd7+

1-0

 

Gallagher J – Lane G [C34] Hastings Masters,/1990

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. Bc4 h6 5. d3 g5 6. g3

 

rnbqkbnr

ppp--p--
---p---p
------p-
--B-Pp--
---P-NP-
PPP----P
RNBQK--R
A classic undermining.

6… Bh3 7. Nd4 d5 8. exd5 Bg7 9. c3 Bxd4 10. cxd4 Bg2 11. Rg1 f3 12. Be3 Nf6 13. Nc3 O-O 14. Qd2 Re8 15. O-O-O

 

rn-qr-k-

ppp--p--
-----n-p
---P--p-
--BP----
--NPBpP-
PP-Q--bP
--KR--R-
15… Ng4 16. Rge1 Nd7 17. Bg1 Ndf6 18. h4 Rxe1 19. Rxe1 Nh5 20. Ne4 gxh4 21. gxh4 Qxh4 22. d6 cxd6 23. Nxd6 f2 24. Bxf2 Qxf2 25. Bxf7+ Kf8 26. Bxh5 Qxd2+ 27. Kxd2 Nf6 28. Bd1 h5 29. Re6 Ng4 30. Bb3 Rd8 31. Rg6 Ke7 32. Nf5+ Kd7 33. Rg7+ Kc8 34. Rh7 Nf6 35. Rh6 Rf8 36. Ng7 Nd5 37. Bxd5 Bxd5 38. Rxh5 Bxa2 39. Ra5 Bg8 40. Rxa7 Kc7 41. Ra5 Rd8 42. Kc3 Kb6 43. Rc5 Bd5 44. Nf5 Be6 45. Ne3 Bf7 46. Rf5 Bg8 47. Rc5 Bf7 48. Nc4+ Ka7 49. b4 Bg8 50. b5 Bd5 51. b6+ Kb8 52. Rc7 Bg2 53. Ne5 Bh1 54. Nd7+ Ka8 55. Rc5 1-0


Minor Variations accepting the gambit

It is important to have an idea how to proceed after these odd lines.

Schlechter C – Teichmann R [C34] Vienna gt,/1903

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 f5 4. e5 g5 5. d4 g4 6. Bxf4 gxf3 7. Qxf3 Qh4+ 8. g3 Qg4 9. Qe3 Nc6 10. Be2 Qg6 11. Nc3 Bb4 12. d5 Nd8 13. O-O-O h6

 

r-bnk-nr

pppp----
------qp
---PPp--
-b---B--
--N-Q-P-
PPP-B--P
--KR---R
14. g4 Ne7 15. d6 Ne6 16. dxe7 Bc5 17. Qg3 Bxe7 18. gxf5 Qxf5 19. Be3 Bg5 20. Nd5 Bxe3+ 21. Qxe3 Kd8 22. Rhg1 Qf8 23. Rdf1 Qc5 24. Qf3 Rf8

 

r-bk-r--

pppp----
----n--p
--qNP---
--------
-----Q--
PPP-B--P
--K--RR-
25. Rg8 1-0

 

Spassky,Boris – Seirawan,Yasser [C34]/Montpellier ct, 1985

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Ne7 4. d4 d5 5. Nc3 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Ng6 7. h4 Qe7

 

rnb-kb-r

ppp-qppp
------n-
--------
---PNp-P
-----N--
PPP---P-
R-BQKB-R
8. Kf2! Bg4 9. h5 Nh4 10. Bxf4 Nc6 11. Bb5 O-O-O 12. Bxc6 bxc6 13. Qd3 Nxf3 14. gxf3 Bf5 15. Qa6+ Kb8 16. Nc5 Bc8 17. Qxc6 Rxd4 18. Rhe1! Rxf4 19. Qb5+ Ka8 20. Qc6+ Kb8 21. Rxe7 Bxe7 22. Rd1 Rf6 23. Nd7+ Bxd7 24. Qxd7

 

-k-----r

p-pQbppp
-----r--
-------P
--------
-----P--
PPP--K--
---R----
24… Rd8 25. Qb5+ Kc8 26. Rxd8+ Bxd8 27. Qa4 g5 28. Qxa7 Rf4 29. Qa6+ Kb8 30. Qd3 Be7 31. Qxh7 g4 32. Kg3 1-0


Counter-Gambits If the Gambit is not accepted, it is usually met by one of these lines. For years the Falkbeer held centre stage, but White seems to have good chances in the main lines. But the recent fashion has been for 3…c6, attributed to Nimzo.

Falkbeer Counter-Gambit

David Bronstein – Tal,Mikhail [C32] URS-TCH/Riga, 1968

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Nf6 5. dxe4 Nxe4 6. Nf3 Bc5 7. Qe2 Bf5 8. Nc3 Qe7 9. Be3 Nxc3 10. Bxc5 Nxe2 11. Bxe7 Nxf4 12. Ba3 Nd7

r---k--r

pppn-ppp
--------
---P-b--
-----n--
B----N--
PPP---PP
R---KB-R
13. O-O-O Be4 14. Ng5 Bxd5 15. g3!?
[15. Re1++/- ]
15… Bxh1 16. gxf4 c5 17. Bc4 Bc6 18. Nxf7 b5 19. Nd6+ Ke7

r------r

p--nk-pp
--bN----
-pp-----
--B--P--
B-------
PPP----P
--KR----
20. Nxb5 Rhf8 21. Nd4 Bb7 22. Ne6 Rf5 23. Rg1 Be4 24. Nc7?
[24. Re1+- ]
24… Rd8 25. Rxg7+ Kf6 26. Rf7+ Kg6 27. Re7 Nf6 28. Ne6 Rc8 29. b3 Rh5 30. Ng5 Bd5 31. Bd3+ Kh6 32. Bb2 c4 33. Bf5 c3 34. Bxc8 cxb2+ 35. Kxb2 Rxh2 36. Rxa7 Rf2 37. Ra4 Kg6 38. Rd4 h5 39. a4 h4 40. a5 Bg2 41. a6 Nh5 42. Bb7 Nxf4 43. Rxf4 1-0

Nimzovitch Counter-Gambit

Illescas Cordoba M – Nunn J [C31] Dubai ol,/1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 c6 4. Nc3 exf4 5. Nf3 Bd6 6. Bc4 Ne7 7. dxc6 Nbxc6 8. d4 O-O 9. O-O Bg4

r--q-rk-

pp--nppp
--nb----
--------
--BP-pb-
--N--N--
PPP---PP
R-BQ-RK-
10. Ne4 Bc7 11. c3 Nd5 12. Nc5 Rb8 13. Qe1 Re8 14. Qh4 Qxh4 15. Nxh4 Ne3 16. Bxe3 Rxe3 17. Rae1 Rxe1 18. Rxe1 g5 19. h3 Bh5 20. Nf5 Bg6 21. Ne7+ Kg7 22. Nxc6 bxc6 23. Na6 Rc8 24. Nxc7 Rxc7 25. Re5 f6 26. Rc5

--------

p-r---kp
--p--pb-
--R---p-
--BP-p--
--P----P
PP----P-
------K-
26… Be4 27. d5 Rd7 28. dxc6 Rc7 29. Bb5 Kf7 30. b4 Ke6 31. a4 Kd6 32. a5 h5 33. h4 Bxc6 34. Bxc6 Rxc6 35. hxg5 fxg5 36. Rxg5 Rxc3 37. Rxh5 Rc4 38. b5 Rc5 39. Rxc5 Kxc5 40. b6 1-0

Spassky,Boris – Polgar,Zsuzsa [C31]/Wellington, 1988

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 c6 4. Nc3 exf4 5. Nf3 Bd6 6. d4 Ne7 7. dxc6 Nbxc6 8. d5?! Nb4 9. Bc4 Bf5 10. Bb3 O-O
[10… Qb6]
11. O-O Bg4 12. Ne4 Nf5 13. c3 Na6 14. Bc2 Bc7 15. Nf2 Bxf3 16. Qxf3 Ne3 17. Bxe3 fxe3 18. Ng4 Qg5 19. Rae1 Rae8 20. Kh1 e2 21. Rxe2 Rxe2 22. Qxe2 Qxd5 23. Bb3 Qd7

-----rk-

ppbq-ppp
n-------
--------
------N-
-BP-----
PP--Q-PP
-----R-K
White has good attacking prospects, not least because Black cannot oppose Bishops.
24. Ne5 Bxe5 25. Qxe5 Nc7 26. h3 Qc8 27. Qe7 Kh8 28. Rxf7 Rxf7 29. Bxf7 b6 30. b4 a5 31. b5 h6 32. a4 Na8 33. Be6 Qb8 34. Bd5 Nc7 35. Bc6 Qc8 36. c4 Na8 37. Qb7 Qxb7 38. Bxb7 Nc7 39. c5 bxc5 40. b6 Ne6 41. Bd5 Nf8 42. Bc6 1-0 Get on with Development

Classical Gambit Declined

This is the safe way to proceed. Short and Speelman slid into this line (from the Vienna) a couple of times in their Candidates’ Match, without Short showing anything special. This is not to say it’s harmless…

Hebden – Lane [C30] London, 1987

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 Nc6?!
It’s got to be worth a punt with the King’s Gambit when a player like Gary Lane can go wrong on move four.
5. Na4 Bb6 6. Bb5 Bd7 7. Nxb6 axb6 8. d3 Qe7 9. O-O Nf6 10. Kh1 h6 11. Qe1 O-O-O 12. a4 exf4 13. Bxf4 Nb8 14. Nd4 c6 15. Qc3 Ne8 16. a5 bxa5 17. Rxa5 Nc7 18. Bc4

-nkr---r

-pnbqpp-
--pp---p
R-------
--BNPB--
--QP----
-PP---PP
-----R-K
18… b5? 19. Bxb5 cxb5 20. Ra7 1-0

Hebden M – Martinovsky E [C30] London op,/1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nc6 6. d3 O-O?! 7. f5

r-bq-rk-

ppp--ppp
--np-n--
--b-pP--
--B-P---
--NP-N--
PPP---PP
R-BQK--R
Another natural-looking move by Black is stamped as a mistake.
7… h6 8. Nd5 Nd4 9. Nxf6+ Qxf6 10. Nxd4 Bxd4 11. c3 Bb6 12. Qh5 c6 13. Rf1

r-b--rk-

pp---pp-
-bpp-q-p
----pP-Q
--B-P---
--PP----
PP----PP
R-B-KR--
13… d5 14. exd5 e4 15. d4 c5 16. g4 e3 17. dxc5 Bxc5 18. Ke2 b5 19. Bd3 Re8 20. g5 hxg5 21. Rf3 Bd7 22. b4 Qxc3 23. Rh3 Kf8 24. bxc5 Qxa1 25. Bxe3 Qxa2+ 26. Kf1 Qa1+ 27. Kf2 Qa2+ 28. Be2 Qxd5 29. Qh8+ Ke7 30. Qxg7 Kd8 31. Qxg5+ Kc8 32. Rh6 Qxf5+ 33. Qxf5 Bxf5 34. Bxb5 Rxe3 35. Kxe3 Rb8 36. Rc6+ Kd8 37. Bc4 Bg6 38. Ra6 Rb7 39. Kd4 Kc7 40. Bd5 Rb4+ 41. Kc3 Rh4 42. Rxa7+ Kb8 43. Re7 Rxh2 44. c6 Rc2+ 45. Kd4 f6 46. Rb7+ Kc8 47. Be6+ Kd8 48. Rd7+ Kc8 49. Rg7+ Kd8 50. Rxg6 Rxc6 51. Bf5 Ke7 52. Rg7+ Kf8 53. Ra7 Rc1 54. Kd5 Re1 55. Kd6 Re2 56. Be6 Rb2 57. Rf7+ Ke8 58. Rxf6 Rb6+ 59. Ke5 Rb5+ 60. Bd5 Ke7 61. Rf7+ Ke8 62. Rf6 Ke7 63. Ra6 Rb1 64. Ra7+ Kf8 65. Be6 Ke8 66. Kf6 Rf1+ 67. Bf5 Kd8 68. Rd7+ Ke8 69. Rd2 Rf3 70. Rc2 1-0

Variation with 2…Nf6

An uncommon line with transpositional possibilities.

Fischer,Robert – Wade,Robert [C30] Vinkovci/Rd: 1, 1968

1.e4 e5 2.f4 Nf6 3.fxe5
[3.Nf3 Nc6 (3…exf4 is the Schallop) ]
3…Nxe4 4.Nf3 Ng5 5.d4 Nxf3+ 6.Qxf3 Qh4+ 7.Qf2 Qxf2+ 8.Kxf2 Nc6 9.c3 d6 10.exd6 Bxd6 11.Nd2 Be6 12.Ne4 Be7 13.Ng5 Bxg5 14.Bxg5 h6 15.Bh4 g5 16.Bg3 0-0-0 17.Bb5 f5 18.Bxc6 bxc6 19.Be5 Rhg8 20.h4 g4 21.h5 g3+ 22.Bxg3 Rg4 23.Rh4 Rdg8 24.Rxg4 Rxg4 25.Re1 Kd7 26.Re5 f4 27.Bh2 Rh4 28.Bg1 Bd5 29.g3 Rg4 30.Bh2 f3 31.b3 a6 32.c4 Rxd4 33.cxd5 Rd2+ 34.Kxf3 Rxh2 35.dxc6+ Kxc6 36.Re6+ Kd7 37.Rxh6 Rxa2 38.Rg6 1-0 Minor Variations declining the Gambit

Keene’s Variation

McDonald N – Bachmayr P [C30] Zug,/1991

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Qh4+
JG recalls advising NM about this move just before the game: “Don’t worry, Neil, nobody plays that line!”
3. g3 Qe7 4. fxe5 d6 5. exd6 Qxe4+ 6. Qe2 Qxe2+ 7. Nxe2 Bxd6 8. Nbc3 c6 9. d3 Nf6 10. Bg5 Nbd7 11. Bg2 h6 12. Bf4 Bxf4 13. Nxf4

r-b-k--r

pp-n-pp-
--p--n-p
--------
-----N--
--NP--P-
PPP---BP
R---K--R
13… O-O [13… Nc5] 14. b4! Re8+ 15. Kd2 Ne5 16. b5 Bg4 17. bxc6 bxc6 18. h3 Bf3 19. Rhf1 Bxg2 20. Nxg2 Rad8 21. Rae1 c5 22. Rf5

---rr-k-

p----pp-
-----n-p
--p-nR--
--------
--NP--PP
P-PK--N-
----R---
22… Nc4+ 23. Kd1 Rxe1+ 24. Kxe1 Re8+ 25. Kf2 Ne5 26. Ne3 Re6 27. Rf4!
with the exchange of Rooks the active White Knights and weak Black Pawns add up to a difficult game for Black.
27… Ra6 28. Ra4 Rxa4 29. Nxa4 Ned7 30. Nc4 Nd5 31. a3 Nc7 32. Nd6 Kf8 33. Ke3 a6 34. Nb7 Nb5 35. Naxc5 Nxc5 36. Nxc5 Nxa3 37. c4 Nc2+ 38. Kd2 Nb4 39. Kc3 a5 40. d4 Nc6 41. d5 Ne5 42. Kd4 f6 43. d6 h5 44. Kd5 Ke8 45. Ke6 1-0

Bucker’s Variation

Jenal J – Grossen K [C30] corres EUR,/1987

1.e4 e5 2.f4 Qf6

rnb-kbnr

pppp-ppp
-----q--
----p---
----PP--
--------
PPPP--PP
RNBQKBNR
An entertaining punt from the Vulture man.
3.Nc3 Qxf4
[4.d4 Qh4+ 5.g3 Qd8 6.dxe5 Nc6 7.Nf3 d6 8.Bg5 f6 9.exf6 gxf6 10.Bf4 Bg4 11.Be2 Qd7 12.Nh4 Bxe2 13.Qxe2 0-0-0 14.0-0-0 Nge7 … (62) 1-0 Berthelot Y – Bucker S [C30] Eger op, 1989]
4.Bc4 Bb4 5.Nf3 Bxc3 6.0-0 f6 7.dxc3 Qg4 8.Bf7+ Ke7 9.Qd5 c6 10.Qb3 Nh6 11.h3 Qg3 12.Bh5 g6 13.Bxh6 gxh5 14.Ng5 1-0

The ideas behind the King’s Gambit

tSlDjLsT
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-+-+pP-+
+-+-+-+-
pPpP-+pP
RnBqKbNr

Introduction

Play through games here:

The King’s Gambit has a romantic reputation which is both
attractive and misleading. It has had a romantic history, but has
not passed through chess history unchanged. On the contrary, each
generation has had its own opinions and favourite variations, and
the King’s Gambit has evolved into a fully modern opening. It does
have some peculiarities, but this makes it a useful hunting ground
for the specialists like Joe Gallagher and the Spanish GM Illescas.
But Nunn and Short have also dabbled with it, and its virtues have
been defended in correspondence play by Bangiev.

  Below, I will introduce the main ideas for each side, but
try to draw out some of the development of modern positional
ideas.

 


Ideas for White


The King’s-side attack


MacDonnell Alexander – De la Bourdonnais
Louis [C37] London m 54, 1834

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. Nc3 gxf3 6. Qxf3
Bh6 7. d4 Nc6 8. O-O

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+x+x
-+s+-+-L
+-+-+-+-
-+bPpX-+
+-N-+q+-
pPp+-+pP
R-B-+rK-

8… Nxd4 9. Bxf7+ Kxf7 10. Qh5+ Kg7 11. Bxf4 Bxf4 12. Rxf4
Nf6 13. Qg5+ Kf7 14. Raf1

 

t+lD-+-T
XxXx+j+x
-+-+-S-+
+-+-+-Q-
-+-SpR-+
+-N-+-+-
pPp+-+pP
+-+-+rK-

14… Ke8 15. Rxf6 Qe7 16. Nd5 Qc5 17. Kh1 Ne6 18. Rxe6+
dxe6 19. Nf6+ 1-0

  Great panache from the legendary Scot.


The King’s-side attack: the open
f-file


Spielmann R – Tarrasch S [C30] Karlsbad,
1923

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 d6 4. c3 Bg4 5. fxe5 dxe5 6. Qa4+
Bd7 7. Qc2 Nc6 8. b4 Bd6 9. Bc4 Nf6 10. d3 Ne7 11. O-O Ng6 12. Be3
b5 13. Bb3 a5 14. a3 axb4 15. cxb4 O-O 16. Nc3 c6 17. h3 Qe7 18.
Ne2 Bb8 19. Kh2 Ba7 20. Bg5 h6 21. Bxf6 Qxf6 22. Nfd4 Qd6 23. Nf5
Bxf5 24. Rxf5

 

t+-+-Tj+
L-+-+xX-
-+xD-+sX
+x+-Xr+-
-P-+p+-+
Pb+p+-+p
-+q+n+pK
R-+-+-+-

24… Nf4 25. Rf1 g6 26. R1xf4 exf4 27. e5 Qe7 28. Rf6 Kg7
29. d4 Bxd4 30. Bxf7 Bxe5 31. Qxg6+ 1-0

 


The King’s-side attack: vulnerable f7
point


Bronstein,David – Dubinin 15th USSR Champ
(??), 1947

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 h5 6. Bc4 Rh7
7. d4 Bh6 8. Nc3 Nc6

 

t+lDj+s+
XxXx+x+t
-+s+-+-L
+-+-N-+x
-+bPpXxP
+-N-+-+-
pPp+-+p+
R-BqK-+r

9. Nxf7 Rxf7 10. Bxf7+ Kxf7 11. Bxf4 Bxf4 12. O-O Qxh4 13.
Rxf4+ Kg7 14. Qd2 d6 15. Raf1 Nd8 16. Nd5 Bd7

 

t+-S-+s+
XxXl+-J-
-+-X-+-+
+-+n+-+x
-+-PpRxD
+-+-+-+-
pPpQ-+p+
+-+-+rK-

17. e5 dxe5 18. dxe5 Bc6 19. e6 Bxd5 20. Rf7+ Nxf7 21.
Rxf7+ Kh8 22. Qc3+ Nf6 23. Rxf6 Qxf6 24. Qxf6+ Kh7 25. Qf5+ Kh6 26.
Qxd5 Kg6 27. Qd7

1-0


The central majority


Bangiev A – Podrezov [C34] corres ARG,
1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e5 Nh5 5. d4 d5 6. c4 g5
7. g4 Ng7 8. Nc3 Bb4 9. Rg1 h5 10. h3 dxc4 11. Bxc4 c5 12. d5 Nd7
13. Bd2 Nb6 14. Qe2 hxg4 15. hxg4 Bd7 16. a3 Ba5 17. Ne4 Bxd2+ 18.
Nfxd2 Qe7 19. d6

 

t+-+j+-T
Xx+lDxS-
-S-P-+-+
+-X-P-X-
-+b+nXp+
P-+-+-+-
-P-Nq+-+
R-+-K-R-

1-0


The King’s Gambit Endgame

King’s Gambit endgames sometimes seem to be a law unto themselves,
with Black often having an extra Pawn they can’t make use of –
namely, a backward f-Pawn. White may have some returns for the Pawn
in central control and extra piece activity, and out of these a win
can be spun. These are of course all good general positional
principles, rather than anything peculiar to the gambit, it’s just
that entering an ending a Pawn up is usually more promising!


Spassky B – Matanovic A [C32] Belgrade,
1964

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Nf6 5. dxe4 Nxe4 6. Be3
Qh4+ 7. g3 Nxg3 8. Nf3

 

tSl+jL-T
XxX-+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+p+-+-
-+-+-P-D
+-+-BnS-
pPp+-+-P
Rn+qKb+r

8… Qe7 9. hxg3 Qxe3+ 10. Qe2 Qxe2+ 11. Bxe2

 

tSl+jL-T
XxX-+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+p+-+-
-+-+-P-+
+-+-+nP-
pPp+b+-+
Rn+-K-+r

Black has two Bishops but White has better central control, better
development and will find good posts for the Knights. The upshot is
that White can make better progress with his Pawn majority.

11… Bg4 12. Nc3 Bb4 13. Ng5 Bxe2 14. Kxe2 Bxc3
15. bxc3 h6 16. Kd3 Rf8 17. Nf3 Na6 18. Rae1+ Kd7 19. c4 f6 20. Kd4
b6 21. f5 Nc5 22. Nh4 Rfe8 23. Re6!

 

t+-+t+-+
X-Xj+-X-
-X-+rX-X
+-Sp+p+-
-+pK-+-N
+-+-+-P-
p+p+-+-+
+-+-+-+r

23… g5 24. Ng6

[24. Ng2 Nxe6+ 25. fxe6+ Ke7 26. Ne3 Rh8 27.
g4]

24… Nxe6+ 25. fxe6+ Rxe6 26. dxe6+ Kxe6 27.
Rxh6 Kf7 28. Ne5+ fxe5+ 29. Kxe5 c5 30. Kf5 Ke7 31. Kxg5 Rf8 32.
Rh2 Kd6 33. g4 Rg8+ 34. Kf4 Rf8+ 35. Kg3 Ke5 36. Re2+ Kd4 37. g5
Kxc4 38. Kg4 Kc3 39. g6 c4 40. Kg5 b5 41. g7 Q

 


Ideas for Black


The vulnerable White King


LaBourdonnais L – Cochrane J [C37] Paris,
1821

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. Ne5 Qh4+ 6. Kf1
f3 7. g3 Qh3+ 8. Kf2 Qg2+ 9. Ke3

 

tSl+jLsT
XxXx+x+x
-+-+-+-+
+-+-N-+-
-+b+p+x+
+-+-KxP-
pPpP-+dP
RnBq+-+r

9… Bh6+ 10. Kd3 d5 11. Bxd5 Na6 12. c3 c6 13. Bxf7+ Ke7
14. Bb3 Nc5+ 15. Kc2 Nxe4 16. Qf1 Bf5 17. Qxg2 Nf2+ 18. d3 fxg2 19.
Rg1 Rd8

 

-+-T-+sT
Xx+-J-+x
-+x+-+-L
+-+-Nl+-
-+-+-+x+
+bPp+-P-
pPk+-SxP
RnB-+-R-

20. Bxh6 Nxh6 21. Rxg2 Nxd3 22. Nxd3 Bxd3+ 23. Kc1 Rhf8 24.
Nd2 Nf5 25. Bd1 Ne3 26. Rg1 Bf1 27. b3 Rf2

 

-+-T-+-+
Xx+-J-+x
-+x+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+x+
+pP-S-P-
p+-N-T-P
R-Kb+lR-

28. Rxf1 Nxf1 29. Nxf1 Rxd1+ 30. Kxd1 Rxf1+ 0-1


The vulnerable White King’s diagonal
e1-h4

tSlDjLsT
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-+-+pP-+
+-+-+-+-
pPpP-+pP
RnBqKbNr

We can see this in its simplest form in the Classical:
2…Bc5 3. fxe5?? and 3…Qh4+ reminds
White that the f-Pawn opens up the King’s-side with risks for both
Kings. This isWhy White nearly always plays 3.
Nf3,
or, if not, a move of the Queen or Bishop to create a
flight square.

  A more complex instance of the same thing is seen in the
Cunningham:

 

tSlDj+sT
XxXxLxXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+pX-+
+-+-+n+-
pPpP-+pP
RnBqKb+r

Now 4. Nc3 Bh4+ and we have more trouble for the
King (by no means fatal here).

4. Bc4 and now rather than snatch at the
check, 4..Nf6! (Euwe) and now 5. e5
Ng4!
, with 6. h3 being ruled out because of the
vulnerable diagonal.


Hang on to the f-Pawn


Kinlay,J – Nunn,J [C36] London,
1977

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. Bb5+ c6 6.
dxc6 Nxc6 7. d4 Bd6 8. O-O O-O 9. Nbd2 Bg4 10. c3 Bc7 11. Nc4 Ne7
12. Ba4 b5 13. Bxb5 Qd5 14. Na3 Qh5

 

t+-+-Tj+
X-L-SxXx
-+-+-S-+
+b+-+-+d
-+-P-Xl+
N-P-+n+-
pP-+-+pP
R-Bq+rK-

The play on the Queen’s-side has distracted White’s pieces, and the
f-Pawn forms the apex of a King’s-side attack.

15. Bd3 Ned5 16. Nc4 Rae8 17. h3 Ne3 18. Bxe3
fxe3 19. hxg4 Nxg4 20. Nce5 Rxe5 21. dxe5 e2 22. Bxe2 Bb6+ 23. Qd4
Qh6 24. Rae1 Rd8 25. Bc4 Rxd4 0-1

 


Central counter


Spielmann,R – Bogoljubov,E [C33] Carlsbad,
1923

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Nc3 c6 5. d4 Bb4 6. Qf3
d5!

  In so many King’s-Pawn openings, this is the recipe for
Black.

7. exd5 O-O 8. Nge2 cxd5 9. Bd3 Bg4

 

tS-D-Tj+
Xx+-+xXx
-+-+-S-+
+-+x+-+-
-L-P-Xl+
+-Nb+q+-
pPp+n+pP
R-B-K-+r

10. Qxf4 Bxe2 11. Kxe2 Nc6 12. Be3 Re8 13. Rhf1 Qe7 14. Rf3
Rad8 15. Kf1 Rd6 16. Qh4

 

-+-+t+j+
Xx+-DxXx
-+sT-S-+
+-+x+-+-
-L-P-+-Q
+-NbBr+-
pPp+-+pP
R-+-+k+-

The game approaches its crisis.

16… Bxc3 17. Bg5 Bxd4! 18. Bxf6 Qxf6 19. Qxh7+
Kf8 0-1

 


Return the Pawn for development
(counter-sacrifice)


Hartston,William – Spassky,Boris [C36]
Hastings, 1966

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. Bb5+ c6 6.
dxc6 Nxc6 7. d4 Bd6 8. Qe2+ Be6

 

t+-Dj+-T
Xx+-+xXx
-+sLlS-+
+b+-+-+-
-+-P-X-+
+-+-+n+-
pPp+q+pP
RnB-K-+r

Black has developed with lightning speed.

9. Ne5 O-O 10. Bxc6 bxc6 11. Bxf4 Nd5 12. Bg3 f6
13. Nf3 Bxg3+ 14. hxg3 Re8

 

t+-Dt+j+
X-+-+-Xx
-+x+lX-+
+-+s+-+-
-+-P-+-+
+-+-+nP-
pPp+q+p+
Rn+-K-+r

White’s development still lags.

15. Kf2 Bf5 16. Qc4 Kh8 17. Nc3 Ne3 18. Qc5 Ng4+
19. Kg1 Qd7 20. Rf1 Bxc2 21. Rh4 Ne3 22. Rc1 g5 23. Rh6 Bg6 24. Na4
Ng4 25. Rh3 Qe6 26. Qc3 Qxa2 27. Nc5 Re3 28. Qd2 Rae8
0-1


The flight to the Queen’s-side


Rubinstein A – Hromadka K [C30] Mahrisch
Ostrau, 1923

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 d6 4. Bc4 Nc6 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. d3
Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Nd4 9. Qg3 Qe7 10. fxe5 dxe5 11. Kd1 c6 12.
a4 Rg8 13. Rf1 h6 14. Ne2 O-O-O

 

-+jT-+t+
Xx+-DxX-
-+x+-S-X
+-L-X-+-
p+bSp+-+
+-+p+-Qp
-Pp+n+p+
R-Bk+r+-

Although in this game Black falls prey to Rubinstein’s mastery, the
switch must always be anticipated by White.

15. Nxd4 Bxd4 16. c3 Bb6 17. a5 Bc7 18. Be3 Kb8
19. Kc2 Ka8 20. Rf3 Nd5 21. Bg1 Nf4 22. Qf2 Bb8 23. g3 Nxh3 24.
Rxf7 Qd6

 

jL-T-+t+
Xx+-+rX-
-+xD-+-X
P-+-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-Pp+-Ps
-Pk+-Q-+
R-+-+-B-

And a blow long anticipated by White makes fitting use of the
f-file invasion:

25. Qb6 Rd7 26. Bc5 Rxf7 27. Bxd6 Rf2+ 28. Qxf2
Nxf2 29. Bc5 1-0

 

 


The development of the King’s
Gambit


The Romantic King’s Gambit

The playing-over of games like these is always a pleasure.


Anderssen,A – Kieseritzky,L [C33] London
“Immortal game”, 1851

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6.
Nf3 Qh6
[6… Qh5] 7. d3 (?) [7. Nc3]
7… Nh5 (?) [7… Bc5] 8. Nh4?
[8. Rg1 /\ 9.g4 8… Qb6 9. Nc3 c6 10. Bc4 Qc5 11. Qe2+- ] but not
[8. Ke2?! Qb6 9. Nc3 c6 10. Bc4 Ba6and ] 8… Qg5
[8… g6] 9. Nf5 c6 (?) [9… g6] 10.
g4?
[10. Ba4] 10… Nf6 (?) [10… g6]
11. Rg1 cxb5? [11… d5?][11… h5] 12.
h4
[12. Qf3? h5]12… Qg6 13. h5 Qg5

[13… Nxh5? 14. gxh5 Qf6 15. Nc3 Bb7 16. Bxf4 g6 17.
Nxb5+- ]

14. Qf3 Ng8

[14… Nxg4 Euwe 15. Rxg4 Qxh5 16. Bxf4+- ]

15. Bxf4 Qf6 [15… Qd8 Reti]
16. Nc3 Bc5

 

tSl+j+sT
X-+x+xXx
-+-+-D-+
+xL-+n+p
-+-+pBp+
+-Np+q+-
pPp+-+-+
R-+-+kR-

17. Nd5 (?)
17.d4! /\ 18.Nd5
17… Qxb2 18. Bd6?

[18. d4][18. Be3][18. Re1]

18… Bxg1 19. e5 Qxa1+

[19… Ba6 20. Nc7+ Kd8 21. Nxa6 Qxa1+ [21…
Bb6 22. Qxa8 Qxc2 23. Qxb8++- ] 22. Ke2]

20. Ke2

 

tSl+j+sT
X-+x+xXx
-+-B-+-+
+x+nPn+p
-+-+-+p+
+-+p+q+-
p+p+k+-+
D-+-+-L-

1-0

 


Rosanes,J – Anderssen,A [C39] Breslau,
1863

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5

 

tSlDjLsT
XxXx+x+x
-+-+-+-+
+-+-N-+-
-+-+pXxP
+-+-+-+-
pPpP-+p+
RnBqKb+r

5… Nf6 6. Bc4 d5 7. exd5 Bd6 8. d4 Nh5 9. Bb5+?

[9. Nc3! Qe7!] or [9. O-O!]

9… c6 10. dxc6 bxc6 11. Nxc6 Nxc6 12. Bxc6+
Kf8!

 

t+lD-J-T
X-+-+x+x
-+bL-+-+
+-+-+-+s
-+-P-XxP
+-+-+-+-
pPp+-+p+
RnBqK-+r

[12… Bd7 13. Bxd7+ Qxd7 14. O-O]

13. Bxa8 Ng3 14. Rh2 [14. Kf2!]
14… Bf5 15. Bd5 Kg7 16. Nc3 Re8+ 17. Kf2 Qb6 18.
Na4

[18. a4 Be5 19. Nb5 a6-/+ ]

18… Qa6 19. Nc3

[19. c4 Qxa4 20. Qxa4 Re2+ 21. Kg1 Re1+ 22. Kf2
Rf1##]

19… Be5

 

-+-+t+-+
X-+-+xJx
d+-+-+-+
+-+bLl+-
-+-P-XxP
+-N-+-S-
pPp+-KpR
R-Bq+-+-

20. a4

[20. dxe5 Qb6+ 21. Ke1 Qg1+ 22. Kd2 Qe3##]

20… Qf1+!! 21. Qxf1 Bxd4+ 22. Be3 Rxe3 23. Kg1
Re1## 0-1

 


The Classical King’s Gambit

This is not to say that nineteenth-century games were without
science. As well as being spiced with a fiery imagination, the
Gambit of this era was also tempered and hardened with cold
reasoning.

 


Morphy,P – Medley,G, London, 1858

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Bc4 d5
7. exd5 Bd6 8. d4 Nh5

 

tSlDj+-T
XxX-+x+x
-+-L-+-+
+-+pN-+s
-+bP-XxP
+-+-+-+-
pPp+-+p+
RnBqK-+r

9. Nc3!

  Morphy so often showed how the correct path in an opening
was to ignore the immediate attack in favour of development.

[9. Bb5+ trying to force a win, was previously
played]

9… Bf5 10. Ne2 Qf6 11. Nxf4 Ng3 12. Nh5 Nxh5
13. Bg5 Bb4+ 14. c3 Qd6 15. O-O Ng7

 

tS-+j+-T
XxX-+xSx
-+-D-+-+
+-+pNlB-
-LbP-+xP
+-P-+-+-
pP-+-+p+
R-+q+rK-

16. Rxf5 Nxf5 17. Qxg4 Ne7 18. Re1 h5 19. Qf3 Rh7 20. Bb5+
c6 21. dxc6 bxc6 22. Nxc6 Nbxc6 23. Bxc6+ … 1-0

 


Steinitz V – Zukertort I [C39] it,
1882

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Bc4 d5
7. exd5 Bg7 8. Nc3 O-O 9. d4 Nh5 10. Ne2 c5

 

tSlD-Tj+
Xx+-+xLx
-+-+-+-+
+-XpN-+s
-+bP-XxP
+-+-+-+-
pPp+n+p+
R-BqK-+r

This is a move of Paulsen’s, whose positional sense was
surprisingly modern. The motive is to break up the White centre,
which here crashes with disastrous results for the White King.

11. c3 cxd4 12. cxd4 Nd7 13. Nxd7 Bxd7 14. Qd3
Rc8 15. Nxf4 Re8+ 16. Kd1 b5

 

-+tDt+j+
X-+l+xLx
-+-+-+-+
+x+p+-+s
-+bP-NxP
+-+q+-+-
pP-+-+p+
R-Bk+-+r

17. Nxh5 bxc4 18. Qa3 Bxd4 19. Bd2 Qb6 20. Bc3 Re3 21.
Re1

 

-+t+-+j+
X-+l+x+x
-D-+-+-+
+-+p+-+n
-+xL-+xP
Q-B-T-+-
pP-+-+p+
R-+kR-+-

21… Bxc3 22. Rxe3 Qxe3 23. bxc3 Qg1+ 24. Kd2 Qxg2+ 25.
Ke3 Re8+ 26. Kd4 Qe4+ 27. Kc5 Qe7+ 28. d6 Qe5+ 29. Kxc4 Qe4+ 30.
Kb3 Rb8+ 31. Qb4 Rxb4+ 32. cxb4 Qd3+ 33. Kb2 Qd4+ 0-1

 


Steinitz W – Schlechter C [C39] Vienna,
1897

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Bg7 6. d4 Nf6
7. Bc4 d5 8. exd5 O-O 9. Nc3 Nh5 10. Ne2 c5

 

tSlD-Tj+
Xx+-+xLx
-+-+-+-+
+-XpN-+s
-+bP-XxP
+-+-+-+-
pPp+n+p+
R-BqK-+r

A few years later, Steinitz, and the Gambit, have moved on. The
next move, due to Blackburne, abandons the centre in order to
dispose of the f-Pawn and exploit the loose Black set-up.

11. Nxf4 Ng3 12. Ne6 fxe6 13. dxe6 Bxe6 14. Bxe6+
Kh8 15. Qxg4 Nxh1 16. Be3

 

tS-D-T-J
Xx+-+-Lx
-+-+b+-+
+-X-N-+-
-+-P-+qP
+-+-B-+-
pPp+-+p+
R-+-K-+s

16… cxd4 17. Bxd4 Qxd4! 18. Qxd4 Nc6 19. Nxc6 bxc6? 20.
Qc4 Rab8 21. O-O-O! Bxb2+ 22. Kd2 Nf2 23. Rb1 Rbd8+ 24. Ke2 Bg7 25.
Rb7! Rd4 26. Qxc6 Re4+ 27. Kd2 Rd4+ 28. Ke3 Nd1+ 29. Ke2 Bh6 30.
Bf7! Rdd8 31. Qxh6 1-0

“A fascinating game, and because of its surprising
twists, quite foreign to present-day play. … We can appreciate
the ability of the old-time masters to assess far quicker than we
are able today, a sound evaluation of intricate variations of this
nature.” — Konig.


The Modern King’s Gambit

In the last Gambit tournament in 1914 the King’s Gambit was not
played once. Had the opening died?

  Rubinstein, the arch-classicist, Reti, the
hypermodernist, and Spielmann, the last Romantic, were invited to
revise the Larobok i Schach after the war. They thought
they had only to add a few wrinkles to the old lines, but found
that many lines were incompatible with the new views of the centre.
Rubinstein in particular took up the variation to defend his
conclusions in practice, and added many brilliancies to the canon
of the Gambit. The Swede Stoltz read and believed…


Stoltz,G – Samisch,Fritz [C39] Swinemunde,
1932

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6

 

tSlDjL-T
XxXx+x+x
-+-+-S-+
+-+-N-+-
-+-+pXxP
+-+-+-+-
pPpP-+p+
RnBqKb+r

6. d4

  Rubinstein concluded that this was the correct way to
proceed, although the move was known to Philidor.

[6. Bc4, played previously, is met of course by
6…d5]

6… d6 7. Nd3 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 Qe7 9. Qe2 Bg7 10. c3
h5 11. Nd2! Nxd2 12. Kxd2 Qxe2+ 13. Bxe2 Bf5 14. Rhf1
Nd7

 

t+-+j+-T
XxXs+xL-
-+-X-+-+
+-+-+l+x
-+-P-BxP
+-Pn+-+-
pP-Kb+p+
R-+-+r+-

Despite the Queen exhange, the attack thunders on.

15. Nb4 Nf6 16. Bb5+ Bd7 17. Rae1+ Kd8 18. Bg5
Bxb5 19. Rxf6 1-0


Rubinstein,Akiba – Yates,Frederick [C34]
Hastings, 1922

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6.
Nxd5 Qxd5 7. d4 Be7 8. Bd3 g5 9. Qe2 Bf5 10. Bxf5 Qxf5

 

tS-+j+-T
XxX-Lx+x
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+dX-
-+-P-X-+
+-+-+n+-
pPp+q+pP
R-B-K-+r

11. g4!? Qd7 12. Bd2 Nc6 13. O-O-O O-O-O 14. h4 f6 15. c4
Qxg4?! 16. hxg5 fxg5 17. d5 Nb4 18. Qxe7 Nd3+ 19. Kc2 Qxf3 20. Qe6+
Kb8 21. Rh3

 

-J-T-+-T
XxX-+-+x
-+-+q+-+
+-+p+-X-
-+p+-X-+
+-+s+d+r
pPkB-+-+
+-+r+-+-

21… Qxd1+ 22. Kxd1 Nf2+ 23. Ke1 Nxh3 24. Qxh3 h5 25. Bc3
g4 26. Qh4 Rhg8 27. Qxh5 g3 28. Bd4 Rde8+ 29. Kd2 Ref8 30. d6 cxd6
31. Qh6 Ka8 32. Qxd6 Rd8 33. Qc5

 

j+-T-+t+
Xx+-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-Q-+-+-
-+pB-X-+
+-+-+-X-
pP-K-+-+
+-+-+-+-

33… Rxd4+ 34. Qxd4 g2 35. Qg1 Rg3 36. b4 a6 37. Ke2 f3+
1/2-1/2

 


The Contemporary King’s Gambit

Our understanding of the positional ideas behind the Gambit has not
advanced much, but progress continues to be made. The positional
advantages that the Gambit offers can be pursued through modern
endgame technique as well as if they arose through any other
opening (Bronstein-Ragozin), and the sundry variations are by no
means exhausted.

  So these days, you can play to out-prepare
(Hebden-Geller) or out-play (Polgar-Flear) your opponent. Even if
the preparation goes astray (Spassky-Fischer), the win for Black
will not be always a matter for technique, as the game remains open
and complex.

 


Bronstein D I – Ragosin V [C36] izt,
1948

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 exf4 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bb5+
Nbd7?!

  A failure of nerve.

6. O-O Nxd5 7. c4 N5f6 8. d4 Be7 9. Bxf4 O-O 10.
Ba4 Nb6 11. Bb3 Bg4 12. Nc3 c6 13. Qd2

 

t+-D-Tj+
Xx+-LxXx
-Sx+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
-+pP-Bl+
+bN-+n+-
pP-Q-+pP
R-+-+rK-

13… a5 14. a3 a4 15. Ba2 Nbd7 16. Rae1 Re8 17. Ng5 Bh5
18. Kh1 Bg6 19. Nf3 Nh5 20. Be3 Qc7 21. Qd1 Qa5 22. Bd2 Qa7 23. c5
b6 24. Bg5 Bxg5 25. Nxg5 Nhf6!? 26. Rxe8+ Rxe8 27. Qxa4 Qxa4 28.
Nxa4 bxc5 29. dxc5 Re2 30. Bc4 Rc2 31. Bb3 Re2 32. Nf3 Ne4 33. Bd1
Re3 34. Kg1 Ndxc5 35. Nxc5 Nxc5 36. Re1 Rxe1+ 37. Nxe1

 

-+-+-+j+
+-+-+xXx
-+x+-+l+
+-S-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
P-+-+-+-
-P-+-+pP
+-+bN-K-

37… Kf8 38. Kf2 Ke7 39. Ke3 Kd6 40. b4 Na6 41. Be2 Nc7
42. Nf3 Nd5+ 43. Kd4 Nf4 44. Bf1 f6 45. Nd2 Ne6+ 46. Kc3 Nc7 47.
Nc4+ Ke7 48. Nb6 Nb5+ 49. Kb2 Bf5 50. a4 Na7 51. Kc3 h5 52. Kd4 Kd6
53. Nc4+ Kc7 54. Kc5 Bd7 55. Nd6 h4 56. Be2 f5 57. g3 hxg3 58. hxg3
Nc8 59. Nxc8 Bxc8 60. Bf3 Bb7 61. a5 g5 62. Bg2 f4 63. gxf4 gxf4
64. Bf3 Ba6 65. Bxc6 Be2 66. b5 f3 67. a6

 

-+-+-+-+
+-J-+-+-
p+b+-+-+
+pK-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+x+-
-+-+l+-+
+-+-+-+-

[67. a6 f2 68. b6+ Kd8 69. a7 f1=Q 70. a8=Q+ Ke7 71. Qe8+ Kf6
72. Qf8+ Kg5 73. Qxf1 Bxf1 74. b7]

1-0

 


Hebden M – Geller E [C36] Moscow,
1986

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 exf4 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nxd5 6.
O-O Be6 7. Bb3 Be7 8. c4 Nb6 9. d4 Nxc4

 

tS-Dj+-T
XxX-LxXx
-+-+l+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+sP-X-+
+b+-+n+-
pP-+-+pP
RnBq+rK-

10. Bxf4 O-O?! 11. Qe2 b5 12. Nc3 a6 13. a4! Nc6
14. axb5 Nxd4 15. Nxd4 Qxd4+ 16. Kh1 Rab8 17. Rxa6 Bd6 18. Ra4!
Bxf4 19. Bxc4 Qd6 20. Rd1 Qe5 21. Bxe6 fxe6 22. Re4 Qg5 23. g3 Bd6
24. Rxe6 Qf5 25. Kg2 Bc5 26. Rd5 Qf2+ 27. Qxf2 Rxf2+ 28. Kh3 Bd6
29. Re2 Rxe2 30. Nxe2

 

-T-+-+j+
+-X-+-Xx
-+-L-+-+
+p+r+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-Pk
-P-+n+-P
+-+-+-+-

This is better for White, although by the end Mark was fighting for
a draw.

30… Re8 31. Nc3 Re6 32. Kg2 Kf7 33. Rf5+ Kg6
34. g4 Re3 35. Rh5 h6 36. Kf2 Rd3 37. Ke2 Rd4 38. h3 Rb4 39. Nd1
Kf6 40. Kd3 Be5 41. Nc3 Rxb2 42. Ne4+ Ke6 43. g5 g6 44. Rxh6 Kf5
45. Rh7 Rxb5 46. Rf7+ Ke6 47. Rh7 Rd5+ 48. Ke3 Ra5 49. Kd3 Ra3+ 50.
Kc4 Kf5 51. Nc5 Rc3+ 52. Kb4 Rc1 53. Nd7 Bg3 54. Nf6 Rb1+ 55. Kc4
Rh1 56. Kd3 Be5 57. Ng4 Bg3 58. Nf6 Ra1 59. h4 Ra3+ 60. Ke2 Ra4 61.
Rf7 Bh2 62. Kf3 Rf4+ 63. Kg2 Rxh4 64. Nh7+ Kg4 65. Nf8 Bd6 66. Nxg6
Rh2+ 67. Kf1 Kxg5 68. Ne7 Rd2 69. Nf5 Bf4 70. Ng7
1/2-1/2

 


Polgar,J – Flear,C [C33] Hastings/SW,11,22,
1989

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nf6

After 3…d5 the Polgars have been playing 4. exd5,
getting into a line of the Modern Defence.

4. d3

 

tSlDjL-T
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+pX-+
+-+p+-+-
pPp+-+pP
RnBqK-Nr

This modest move intends to reach a playable middlegame with an
extra central Pawn. Black is objectively equal but can be
outplayed.

4… d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nf3 Nb6 7. Bb3 Bd6 8.
Qe2+ Qe7 9. Nc3 Bg4 10. Qxe7+ Kxe7 11. Ne4 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Nc6 13.
Nxd6 cxd6 14. Bxf4 Nd4 15. Kf2 Nxb3 16. axb3 a6 17. Ra5 Kd7 18. b4
Rhe8 19. c4 Re6 20. b5 axb5 21. Rxb5 Kc6 22. Rc1 Ra2

 

-+-+-+-+
+x+-+xXx
-SjXt+-+
+r+-+-+-
-+p+-B-+
+-+p+p+-
tP-+-K-P
+-R-+-+-

23. Rb3! Nd7 24. d4 Rf6 25. Bg3 b6 26. Re1 d5 27. cxd5+
Kxd5 28. Re7 Kc4 29. Rc3+ Kb4 30. Rc2 Kb3 31. Rd2 Ra7 32. d5 b5 33.
d6 Rf5 34. Rd3+ Kc2 35. Rc3+ Kxb2 36. Rc7 1-0

 


Spassky,Boris – Fischer,Robert (2) [C39] Mar
del Plata, 1960

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. d4 d6
7. Nd3 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 Bg7 9. Nc3?! Nxc3 10. bxc3 c5

 

tSlDj+-T
Xx+-+xLx
-+-X-+-+
+-X-+-+-
-+-P-BxP
+-Pn+-+-
p+p+-+p+
R-+qKb+r

11. Be2 cxd4 12. O-O Nc6 13. Bxg4 O-O 14. Bxc8 Rxc8 15. Qg4
f5=/+ 16. Qg3 dxc3 17. Rae1 Kh8 18. Kh1 Rg8 19. Bxd6 Bf8 20. Be5+
Nxe5 21. Qxe5+ Rg7 22. Rxf5 Qxh4+ 23. Kg1

 

-+t+-L-J
Xx+-+-Tx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-Qr+-
-+-+-+-D
+-Xn+-+-
p+p+-+p+
+-+-R-K-

23… Qg4

[23…Qg3-/+]

24. Rf2 Be7 25. Re4 Qg5 26. Qd4 Rf8 27. Re5 Rd8
28. Qe4 Qh4 29. Rf4 1-0

Double Bishop Endgames

by

Chris Bellers

“Deux fous gagnent toujours, mais trois fous,
non!
“

— Alexander Alekhin, on the advantage of the Two Bishops at
amateur level

This session looks mainly at endings involving BB vs. BN
or NN and no other pieces. They demonstrate that, even where pawns
are evenly placed, the two bishops are often enough to force a
win.

  If you have the two bishops, be prepared for patient
manoevring, and do not assume an automatic win. Game 3.1 is a
particularly long encounter where White gradually builds up a
winning position but slips at the end and should have only
drawn.

1. Opposite coloured bishops While many
opposite coloured bishop endings do end in draws, it is a mistake
to think that all such endings are automatically drawn. It is true
that an extra pawn often does not suffice, and sometimes not even
an extra two or three. However, there are a couple of ideas in
these endings that might be of interest.

  Firstly, there is ‘creeping round the edges’. In the
following position, Black seems to have a successful blockade.


1.1 ?? – ?? (cb), 1995

(wKe4,Be6,Pb7,f5; bKf6,Bb8)

 

-L-+-+-+
+p+-+-+-
-+-+bJ-+
+-+-+p+-
-+-+k+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-

1. Kf3 Bc7 ?

  Black must prevent Kg4, so …Kg5 is necessary

[After 1… Kg5 the game is drawn: 2. Bc8 Bc7 3. Ke4
Kf6 4. Kd5 Bh2 5. Kc6 Ke7 6. Kb6 Bb8]

2. Kg4 Bb8

[2… Kg7 3. Kg5 Bd8+ 4. f6+ Bxf6+ 5. Kf5]

3. Kh5 Bf4 4. Bc8 Bc7

[4… Kg7 5. Kg4 Bc7 6. Kg5 Kf7 7. f6]

 

5. Kh6 Bb8 6. Kh7 Kf7 7. Be6+ Kf6 8. Kg8 Bd6 9.
Bc8

  Again, Black is in zugzwang, and must give way allowing
the f-pawn to advance; once it reaches f7, the bK must go to f8,
and the wK can go ’round to support the other pawn.

9… Ke7 10. Kg7 1-0

 

  The other idea I learned the hard way. In the following
position, Black had lost a [pawn in the opening, and is now forced
to exchange rooks. However, I was not too unhappy about this as I
assumed the position was drawn. What does it look like to you?


1.2 Soesan – Bellars, Paignton, 1976

(wKe3,Bd4,Rb2,Pa5,c4,f3,g3,h2; bKc6,Bg6,Rd7,Pa6,f6,g7,h7)

 

-+-+-+-+
+-+t+-Xx
x+j+-Xl+
P-+-+-+-
-+pB-+-+
+-+-KpP-
-R-+-+-P
+-+-+-+-

1… Rb7 2. Rxb7 Kxb7 3. Bc5 Bf7 4. Kd4 Kc6 5. Bf8 g6 6.
Be7 f5 7. f4 Kd7 8. Bc5 Kc6 9. Bb6 Kd6 10. c5+ Kc6

 

 

-+-+-+-+
+-+-+l+x
xBj+-+x+
P-P-+x+-
-+-K-P-+
+-+-+-P-
-+-+-+-P
+-+-+-+-

?! Now the wK penetrates and the bishop is short of squares. The
rest of the game is an object lesson in how difficult it is to
defend with a bishop when the pawns are on the same colour.

[10… Ke6 11. c6 Be8 12. Kc5 also wins]

11. Ke5 Be8 12. Ke6 Kb5 13. Ke7 Bc6 14. Kf7 Kc4
15. Kg7 Kd5 16. Kxh7 Be8 17. Kg7 Ke6 18. h4 Kd5 19. Kf8 Bd7 20. Kf7
Bc6 21. Kxg6 Ke6 22. h5 Be8+ 23. Kg5 Bd7 24. Bc7 Kf7 25. Be5 Kg8
26. Kf6 1-0

 


2. Two bishops with an unbalanced pawn
position

The two bishops are particularly powerful and this alone is often
sufficient to win. The winning process consists of four steps:

place the pieces in the best possible positions
(i.e. where they cramp the opponent’s pieces)

set up an outside passed pawn (or a potential
outside passed pawn) – this means advancing the pawns as far as you
can

if the opponent’s king goes to the threatened
sector, go to the other wing – either to capture pawns with the
bishops or force an entry for the king

If the opponent does not try to stop the pawns
with his king, then advancing the passed pawn will cost him a
piece


2.1 Leonhardt – Bernstein, Barmen,
1905

(wKd3,Be3,g2,Pa2,b3,d4,d5,f4,h3; bKf8,Ng3,Bg7,Pa7,b7,e7,f7,g6,h7)

 

-+-+-J-+
Xx+-XxLx
-+-+-+x+
+-+p+-+-
-+-P-P-+
+p+kB-Sp
p+-+-+b+
+-+-+-+-

1. d6 exd6

[1… b6 2. d7]

2. Bxb7 Nf5 3. Bf2 Bh6 4. Ke4 Ne7 5.
d5!

  ! cramping the Black pieces

5… f5+ 6. Kf3 a6

[6… a5 7. Bb6]

7. a4

 

 

-+-+-J-+
+b+-S-+x
x+-X-+xL
+-+p+x+-
p+-+-P-+
+p+-+k+p
-+-+-B-+
+-+-+-+-

threatening b4-b5 and if …axb, the a-pawn will not recapture but
run to a8. So, if the pawn gets to a5, it cannot be stopped

7… Bg7 8. Ke2

[8. b4 Bc3 9. b5 axb5 10. axb5 Ke8 11. Ba7 Kd7 and if
now 12. b6 ? 12… Bd4 and the win is not straightforward]

8… Bc3

  the second step is over; now we have the fourth idea

 

9. Kd3 Bb4 10. Bxa6 h6

[10… Nxd5 11. Kc4 Nc7 12. Kxb4 Nxa6+ 13. Kb5 Nc7+
14. Kb6 Nd5+ 15. Kb7 winning]

11. Bb7 g5 12. fxg5 hxg5 13. Kc4 Bd2 14.
b4

  and soon won

…1-0

 


2.2 Perlis – Baird, Barmen, 1905

(wKd2,Bb6,c2,Pa3,b4,e4,f3,g3,h2; bKe8,Nd8,Be6,Pb7,c6,e5,f6,g7,h7)

 

-+-Sj+-+
+x+-+-Xx
-Bx+lX-+
+-+-X-+-
-P-+p+-+
P-+-+pP-
-+bK-+-P
+-+-+-+-

1. f4 exf4 2. gxf4 Ba2 3. Kc3 Ne6 4. Be3 Nf8 5. a4 Nd7 6.
Bd3 Kd8 7. Kd4 Nf8 8. f5 ! 8… Nd7 9. Bf4 Ke7 10. h4 Bb3 11. a5 h6
12. Be2 Ba2 13. Bd1 Bf7 14. Bc7 ! 14… Ba2 15. Ba4 Bf7

 

 

-+-+-+-+
+xBsJlX-
-+x+-X-X
P-+-+p+-
bP-Kp+-P
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-

White cannot improve his position any more, and breaks through with
sacrifice to create a passed pawn

16. Bxc6 bxc6 17. a6 c5+ 18. Ke3

[18. bxc5 Nb8 19. Bxb8 Be8 20. Kd5 was
simpler]

18… Nb6 19. Bxb6 Be8 20. Bxc5+ 1-0

 

  Against a doubled pawn the two bishops will generally be
able to force a gain of material, or an outside passed pawn.


2.3 Soultanbieff-Flohr, Folkestone, 1933

(wKg1,Nh1,Bd2,Pb2,b3,d4,e3,f4,h3; bKg7,Bc6,h4,Pa6,b7,e4,e6,f5,h6)

 

-+-+-+-+
+x+-+-J-
x+l+x+-X
+-+-+x+-
-+-PxP-L
+p+-P-+p
-P-B-+-+
+-+-+-Kn

The key here is White’s weak b pawns. The plan is to force b4, play
the K to the Q-side, capture one of the b-pawns and create an
outside passed pawn.

1… Kg6 2. Kg2 Bd5 3. b4 Kf7 4. Ng3 Ke8 5. Ne2
Kd7 6. Nc3 Kc6 7. Kh2 Bb3 8. Kg2 Bc4 9. Kg1 Bd3 10. Kg2 Bc4 11. Nb1
b6 12. Kg1 Bd3 13. Nc3 Be7 14. Kf2 Bxb4 15. Nxe4 Be7 16. Nc3 Bh4+
17. Kg1 Bc4 18. Kg2 a5 19. Kg1 b5 20. Kg2 h5 21. Kg1 Bb3 22. Kg2 b4
23. Ne2 Bd5+ 24. Kf1 Bc4 25. Be1 Bxe1 26. Kxe1 Bxe2 27. Kxe2 a4
0-1

 


2.4 Zagorovsky – Bryson, Corr, 1994

(wKh1,Nd4,Bd2,Pa5,b2,f4,g3,h2; bKg8,Bd7,f8,Pa6,b4,e4,f7,g7,h7)

 

-+-+-Lj+
+-+l+xXx
x+-+-+-+
P-+-+-+-
-X-NxP-+
+-+-+-P-
-P-B-+-P
+-+-+-+k

Here Black is a pawn up, but must play carefully because he is
unable to cramp the knight

36… Bc5 37. Be3 b3 ! 38. Kg2 !! 38…
Be6

[38… Ba4 39. Kf2 Bb4 40. Bc1 ! and
Kf2-e3xe4]

[38… Bg4 39. Kf2 Bd1 40. Nc6 !]

39. Kf2

 

[39. Nxe6 Bxe3 40. Nc7 Bc5 41. Nxa6 Ba3 42.
Kf2

[42. Kf1 Kf8 43. Ke2 Ke7 44. Kd2 Kd6 ! 45. bxa3 e3+
46. Kxe3 b2]

42… Bxb2 43. Nc5 Bd4+]

39… Bd5 40. Nf5 Bb4 41. Bd4 g6 42. Nh6+ Kf8 43.
Ng4 f5 44. Nf6 Bc6 45. Nxh7+ Ke7 46. Ng5 Kd6 47. Ke3 Bxa5 48. g4
Be1 49. Be5+ Kd5 50. gxf5 gxf5 51. Nh7 a5 52. Nf6+ Kc4 53. Ke2
Bb4

 

-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+l+-N-+
X-+-Bx+-
-Lj+xP-+
+x+-+-+-
-P-+k+-P
+-+-+-+-

0-1

  54. h4 a4 55. h5 a3 56. bxa3

[56. h6 a2 57. h7 a1=Q 58. h8=Q Qe1#]

  56… Bc3 57. Bxc3 Kxc3 58. h6 b2 59. Nxe4+ Bxe4 60. h7
b1=Q 61. h8=Q+ Kb3

  An isolated pawn may be serious enough for a forced
loss

 


2.5 Rubinstein – Gajdos, Bremen,
1905

(wKg1,Bd4,e2,Pa2,b2,e3,f3,g2,h2; bKf7,Nd6,Bc8,Pa6,b7,d5,f6,g7,h7)

 

-+l+-+-+
+x+-+jXx
x+-S-X-+
+-+x+-+-
-+-B-+-+
+-+-Pp+-
pP-+b+pP
+-+-+-K-

1. Kf2 Bd7 2. Ke1 Nb5

[2… Bb5]

3. Bc5 Ke6 4. Kd2 f5 ?

  a positional blunder

5. b3 Nd6 6. a4 Nc8 7. Kc3 Ne7 8. Bd4 g6 9. Kb4
Bc6 10. Kc5 Kd7 11. a5 Nc8 12. Bd1 Na7 13. h4 Nb5 14. Bc2 Nc7 15.
g3 Ne8 16. Be5 ! 16… Ke6 17. f4

 

-+-+s+-+
+x+-+-+x
x+l+j+x+
P-KxBx+-
-+-+-P-P
+p+-P-P-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+-+-

17… Kd7 18. b4 Nc7 19. Bxc7 ! 19… Kxc7 20. Bb3 h5 21.
Ba2 Kd7 22. Bxd5 Bxd5 23. Kxd5 Kc7 24. Ke5 1-0

 

  Where there is a weak colour complex the two bishops can
usually clear a path for the king by constricting the enemy
pieces


2.6 Kasenfuss – Fine, Kemeri, 1937

(wKg1,Nc2,Be3,Pa4,b3,d4,e5,f4,g3,h2;
bKg8,Bd7,e7,Pa7,b7,d5,f7,g4,g7,h5)

 

-+-+-+j+
Xx+lLxX-
-+-+-+-+
+-+xP-+x
p+-P-Px+
+p+-B-P-
-+n+-+-P
+-+-+-K-

1… Bf5 2. Ne1 Bb1 3. Bd2 Kh7 4. Kf2 Kg6 5. Ke3 Kf5 6. a5
g5

  outside passed pawn

7. Nd3 Bc2 8. Nc5 gxf4+ 9. gxf4 b6 10. axb6 axb6
11. Nd7 b5 12. b4 h4 13. Nc5 g3 14. hxg3 hxg3 15. Kf3 Bh4 16. Be3
Bd1+ 17. Kg2 Kg4 18. Bd2 Bf3+ 19. Kg1 Kf5 20. Be3 Be4 21. Bd2 g2
22. Nxe4 Kxe4 23. Kxg2 Kxd4 24. Kh3 Be7 25. Kg4 Kd3

  and the d-pawn decides

1-0

 

  Another theme is to exchange a B for N leaving pawns on
the colour of the opposing B.

 


2.7 Van Scheltinga – Fine, Amsterdam,
1936

(wKh2,Nf3,Bd2,Pb4,c5,e4,f2,g2,h3; bKg8,Bd3,g7,Pa6,b7,e6,f7,g6,h7)

 

-+-+-+j+
+x+-+xLx
x+-+x+x+
+-P-+-+-
-P-+p+-+
+-+l+n+p
-+-B-PpK
+-+-+-+-

1. e5 Be4 2. Bc3 Bxf3 3. gxf3 Kf8 4. Kg3 Ke8 5. Kf4 Kd7 6.
Ke4 Kc6 7. Kd4 Kb5 8. Bd2 h5 9. f4 Bf8 10. f3 a5 0-1

 

  Finally there is opposite coloured bishops theme

  In the following game belongs in the ‘blocked pawn
structure’ section, but soon becomes unbalanced.


2.8 Bellars – James, Paignton, 1976

(wKg1,Bd3,e3,Pa2,b2,c3,e4,f2,g3,h3;
bKg8,Ne6,Bg7,Pa7,b6,c5,e5,f7,g6,h7)

 

-+-+-+j+
X-+-+xLx
-X-+s+x+
+-X-X-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-PbB-Pp
pP-+-P-+
+-+-+-K-

30… Bf6 ? 31. f4 exf4 ?

32. gxf4 Kg7 33. Kg2 Bd8 34. Kf3 h5 35. Bf2 Bc7
36. Be3 Bd8 37. Bc4 Be7 38. Bd2 Bd8 39. e5 Bh4 40. Be3 Be1 41. Ke4
Bh4 42. a4 a5 43. Bf1 Bd8 44. Kd5 Bh4 45. Be2 Bd8 46. f5 gxf5 47.
Bxh5 Ng5 48. Bxg5 Bxg5 49. Kc6 Bd8 50. c4 Kf8 51. Kd7 Bh4 52. Kc7
Bg3 53. Kxb6 Bxe5 54. b3 Bc3 55. Kxc5 1-0

 


3. Pawns blocked and/or balanced

The defender drawing chances are greater, but still has a difficult
game. The winning process consists of 5 steps:

1. weaken the opponent’s pawns

2. cramp the opponent’s peces

3. clear a path for the king

4. after the king has penetrated as far as
possible, force the exchange of the blocking piece

5. penetrate with the King and capture
material

 


3.1 Berger-Tchigorin, Carlsbad 1907

(wKe1,Bf4,f5,Pa2,b3,c4,f2,g2,h3; bKe8,Nf6,Bc5,Pa7,b7,c6,f7,g7,h6)

 

-+-+j+-+
Xx+-+xX-
-+x+-S-X
+-L-+b+-
-+p+-B-+
+p+-+-+p
p+-+-Pp+
+-+-K-+-

1… Ke7 2. Be5

[2. Bc8]

2… Ne8 3. Ke2 Bd6 4. Bc3 b6 ?

[4… Kd8]

5. g3 f6 ?

  step 1 is completed, and now (after the errors) there is
a forced win! 6. f4 Bc5 7. Be4 Kd7 8. b4 Be7 9. Kf3 Nd6 10.
Bd3 Ke6 11. g4 g5 ?

  step 2 is now completed

[11… Kd7 12. Kg3 Kc7 13. Kh4 f5+ 14. Kh5]

[11… Kf7 12. Bd4 Ke6 13. a3 Kf7 14. c5 bxc5 15.
Bxc5 Nc8 16. Bf5 Bxc5

17. bxc5 Ne7 18. Bd7 zugzwang – the wK will go to the
Q-side]

12. a3 Nf7 13. Bf5+ Kd6 14. Bg6 Nd8 15. fxg5 hxg5
16. Ke4 Ne6 17. Bf7 Ng7

[17… Nf4 18. Kf5 Nxh3 19. Bxf6 Bxf6 20. Kxf6 and id
the N moves, the g-pawn

goes]

18. Be1 Kd7 19. Bc3 Bd8 20. b5 ! 20… Ke7 21.
Bg8 Kf8 22. Bh7 cxb5 23. cxb5 Ke7

  step 3 now complete: the wK now has a clear path

24. Bb4+ Ke6 25. Bg8+ Kd7 26. Kd5

  zugzwang

26… Be7

[26… Kc7 27. Bf8 Ne8 28. Be6 Kb7 29. Bd7 Nc7+ 30.
Ke4 a6 31. a4 axb5 32. axb5 Kb8 33. Bd6 Kb7 34. Bc6+ Kc8 35.
Kf5]

27. Bxe7 Kxe7

  step 4 now complete

28. Kc6 Ne8 29. a4 Nd6 30. Kc7 Ne4 31. Bb3 Nc5
32. Bc2 Ke6 33. Kb8

[33. Kc6 ? game continuation 33… Ke5 34. a5 Ne6 35.
axb6 Nd4+ 36. Kb7 axb6 37. Bd3 when 37… f5 38. gxf5 Nxb5 draws by
wrong RP]

33… Kd6

[33… a6 34. Kc7 axb5 35. axb5 Ke5 36. Kxb6 Kd6 37.
Ka7 Kc7 38. b6+ Kc6 39. Be4+]

34. Kxa7 Kc7 35. a5 bxa5 36. b6+ Kc6 37. Be4+
Nxe4 38. b7 1-0

 


3.2 Tarrasch – Rubinstein, San Sebastian,
1912

(wKg2,Nh3,Bc2,Pa2,d3,f5,g3; bKd6,Ba6,d4,Pa5,d5,f6,g7)

 

-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-X-
l+-J-X-+
X-+x+p+-
-+-L-+-+
+-+p+-Pn
p+b+-+k+
+-+-+-+-

Here, the first three steps can be regarded as complete

1… Ke5 2. g4 Be3

  ‘stalemating’ the knight – a common idea

3. Kf3

[3. Nf2 Bxf2 4. Kxf2 Kf4]

3… Kd4 4. Bb3 Bb7

 

[4… Bxd3 also wins 5. Bxd5 Bf1 6. Bb7 Bxh3 7. Ba6
Kc3 8. Kg3 Kb2 some delicate footwork on both sides here! it’s the
opposite coloured B possibilities that are at issue 9. Bc4 Bf1 10.
Bxf1 Kxa2 11. Kf3 Bh6 12. Bb5 Kb3 13. Ke4 a4 14. Kd4 a3]

5. Ke2 Ba6 6. Bc2

[6. Bxd5 transposes to the previous note]

6… Bb5 7. a4 Bd7 8. Kf3 Kc3 9. Kxe3 d4+ 10. Ke2
Kxc2 11. Nf4 Bxa4 12. Ne6 Bb3 13. Nxd4+ Kb2 14. Nb5 a4 15. Ke3 a3
16. Nxa3 Kxa3 17. Kd4 Kb4 0-1

 


3.3 Bellars-Goodman, Paignton 1977

(wKg2,Bd3,e3,Pa2,b5,c3,e4,f2,g3,h3;
bKg8,Nd7,Bd6,Pa7,b6,c5,e5,f7,g6,h7)

 

-+-+-+j+
X-+s+x+x
-X-L-+x+
+pX-X-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-PbB-Pp
p+-+-Pk+
+-+-+-+-

cf. 2.8

26… Kf8 27. f4 Ke7 28. Kf3 Nf8 29. a4 Ne6 30.
f5 Nf8 31. g4 f6 32. g5 Nd7 33. h4 Nf8 34. Bc4 Nd7 35. Bg8 Nf8 36.
gxf6+ ?

  (time trouble)

[36. Bxh7 Nxh7 37. fxg6 Nf8 38. g7]

[36. Kg4 best, idea h5 when White will have a passed
pawn and King entry (step 3)]

 

36… Kxf6 37. Bg5+ Kg7 38. Bd5 Nd7 39. Be6 Nf6
40. c4 ?

  closing the last entry point for the wK!

40… Ne8 41. Bd8

  can White win at all? Black is cramped but what is
White’s plan? As it happens…

41… Bc7 ? 42. f6+ Kf8 ?? 43. Be7#
1-0

  A tough one: White has to work hard for an opening before
running out of pawns; Black’s pieces are more active

 


3.4 ?? – ?? (cb), 1995

(wKg3,Bd2,d3,Pa3,b2,c2,f4,g4,h4; bKe8,Nc6,Bf7,Pa6,b7,d5,f6,g7,h6)

 

-+-+j+-+
+x+-+lX-
x+s+-X-X
+-+x+-+-
-+-+-PpP
P-+b+-K-
-PpB-+-+
+-+-+-+-

1. g5 hxg5 2. hxg5 fxg5 3. fxg5 Ne5 4. Bf5 g6 5. Bc8 Nc4 6.
Bc1

[6. Bc3 Nd6 7. Bh3 Ne4+]

6… Nd6 7. Bg4 Ke7 8. Kf4 Be6 9. Bf3 Bf5 10.
Bxd5 Bxc2 11. Ke5 Bf5 12. Be3

  idea Bc5

12… Nf7+ 13. Kd4 Nd8 14. Kc5 Bc8 15. b4 Bd7 16.
Bd2

[16. Bd4 Ne6+]

16… Bb5 ?! 17. Be4 Kf7 18. Kd6 Bc4 19. Kd7 Nc6
20. Kc7 Nd4 21. Bxb7 Nb5+ 22. Kb6 Nxa3 23. Bxa6 Be6 24. Kc5 Bf5 25.
b5 Nxb5 26. Bxb5 1-0

 

  The bishops are at their worst in blocked positions, and
in positions where the pawns are all on the same side. Here, even
an extra pawn may not be enough to win

 


3.5 Euwe – Alekhin, 3rd Match Game,
1937

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Bd3
Bb4 7. O-O O-O 8. a3 Bxc3 9. bxc3 Qc7 10. Nd2 e5 11. Bb2 e4 12. Be2
b5 13. cxb5 cxb5 14. a4 bxa4 15. c4 dxc4 16. Nxc4 Nb6 17. Nxb6 axb6
18. Rxa4 Bb7 19. Rxa8 Rxa8 20. Qb1 Re8 21. Rc1 Qd6 22. Qc2 h6 23.
Qc7 Qxc7 24. Rxc7 Rc8 25. Rxc8+ Bxc8 26. f3 Bb7 27. Kf2 Ne8 28. Ba3
Bd5 29. Be7 f5 30. fxe4 fxe4 31. Bd8 Nd6 32. Bxb6 Nc4 33. Bc7
Kf7

  (wKf2,Bc7,e2,Pd4,e3,g2,h2; bKg8,Nc4,Bd5,Pe4,g7,h6)

 

-+-+-+j+
+-B-+-X-
-+-+-+-X
+-+l+-+-
-+sPx+-+
+-+-P-+-
-+-+bKpP
+-+-+-+-

1… Kf7 2. h4 g5

  else Bf4 and h5 frees the wK

3. Bh5+ Ke7

[3… Kf6 4. Bd8+ Kf5 5. g4+]

[3… Kg7 4. Bd8 gxh4 5. Bxh4 andBh4-g3-f4]

4. Bg4 Bb7

  white can make no further progress with the Bishops, so
offers to exchange the strong Knight

5. Be5 Nxe5 6. dxe5 gxh4 7. Kg1 Ba6 8. Kh2
Kf7

  and White eventually had to settle for a draw.

Q

 

[34. h4 g5 35. Bh5+ Ke7 36. Bg4 Bb7 37. Be5 Nxe5 38.
dxe5 gxh4 39. Kg1 Ba6 40. Kh2 Kf7]

41. Kh3 Bf1 42. Bf5 Ke7 43. Kh2 Be2 44. Kh3 Bf1
45. Bxe4 Ke6 46. Kxh4 Kxe5 47. Bf3 Kf6 48. Kh5 Kg7 49. e4 Bd3 50.
e5 Bg6+ 51. Kg4 Kf7 52. Bd5+ Ke7 53. Kf4 Bh7 54. g3 Kf8 55. Be4 Bg8
56. Bf3 Ke7 57. Kg4 Ke6 58. Kf4 Ke7 59. Bg4 Bb3 60. Bc8 Kf7
Q

 

  Endings with the pawns all on one side are ALMOST ALWAYS
drawn if the superior side has 3 pawns or less, USUALLY drawn if he
has 4 pawns

 


4. Conclusion

The two bishops are better than two knights or bishop/knight
partnership in most normal positions.

  If the pawns are unbalanced, so that the side with
the bishops can set up an outside passed pawn, it is virtually a
forced win.

  If the pawns are blocked, the slightest weakness in the
pawn structure may be fatal.

  The three ideas in all such endings are:

limit the opponent’s mobility

stalemate the knight

exchange off pieces to transpose into favourable
simpler endings (especially those where the opponent’s pawns are on
the same colour as their bishop

Steve Homer at work

Wood, DA (2200) – Homer, SJ (Surrey Open )
(2040) (7) [C04] praxis: positional sacrifice in club play,
1988

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nc6 4. Ngf3 Nf6 5. e5 Nd7 6. Nb3
f6 7. Bf4 fxe5 8. dxe5 Be7 9. Bd3 O-O 10. Bg3 Nb4 11. Be2 c5 12.
O-O a5 13. a3 Nc6 14. c4!? d4 15. Bd3

 

t+lD-Tj+
+x+sL-Xx
-+s+x+-+
X-X-P-+-
-+pX-+-+
Pn+b+nB-
-P-+-PpP
R-+q+rK-

15… Rxf3!? 16. Qxf3 Ndxe5 17. Qe2 Nxd3 18. Qxd3 e5 19.
Rfe1 Bd6 20. Nd2 Qf8 21. Qf3 Qe7 22. Ne4 Be6 23. Qe2 Bc7 24. Nd2
Qf7 25. Rac1 Re8 26. Ne4 Qe7 27. Qd3 b6 28. h4 h6 29. Nd2 Qf7 30.
Qe4 Qd7 Q

 

Smith, AP (2100) – Homer, SJ (Surrey Open )
(2040) (5) [B60] praxis: positional sacrifice in club play,
1996

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Bg5
Bd7 7. Bxf6 gxf6 8. Nf5 Qa5 9. Bb5 a6?! 10. Bxc6 bxc6 11. Qd3 Rb8
12. O-O h5

 

-T-+jL-T
+-+lXx+-
x+xX-X-+
D-+-+n+x
-+-+p+-+
+-Nq+-+-
pPp+-PpP
R-+-+rK-

13. b4! Qb6

[13… Qxb4 14. Rab1]

14. a4 Bxf5 15. exf5 Bh6 16. b5! axb5 17. axb5
cxb5 18. Nd5 Qb7 19. Rfe1 Bf8 20. Qd4! Kd8 21. Ra7 Qc6

 

-T-J-L-T
R-+-Xx+-
-+dX-X-+
+x+n+p+x
-+-Q-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+p+-PpP
+-+-R-K-

22. Qb4! Qxd5 23. Qa5+ Ke8 24. Qc7 1-0

 

Homer, SJ (2040) – Parr, F (Surrey Open )
(2145) (2) [B07] praxis: positional sacrifice in club play,
1988

1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. g3 Bg7

[4… Bg4]

5. Bg2 O-O 6. Nge2 Nc6 7. O-O

[7. h3 e5 8. Be3]

7… e5 8. d5

[8. Be3 Ng4]

8… Ne7 9. a4 Ne8 10. Be3 f5 11. f3 Nf6 12. Kh1
c6 13. a5 c5

 

t+lD-Tj+
Xx+-S-Lx
-+-X-Sx+
P-XpXx+-
-+-+p+-+
+-N-BpP-
-Pp+n+bP
R-+q+r+k

White is being outplayed.

14. b4!? cxb4 15. Na4?!

[15. Nb5!? a6 16. Bb6 Qd7 17. Nc7 Rb8 /\ …Ne8 may
recover]

15… Bd7 16. Nb2 fxe4 17. fxe4 Ng4 18. Bg1 Bh6
19. Rf3 Qc7 20. Nd3 Nf6

 

t+-+-Tj+
XxDlS-+x
-+-X-SxL
P-+pX-+-
-X-+p+-+
+-+n+rP-
-+p+n+bP
R-+q+-Bk

21. Nxe5 a good try 21… dxe5 22. d6 Qd8
23. dxe7 Qxe7 24. Rd3 Bc6 25. Rd5 Bxd5 26. exd5 Rfd8 27. c4 bxc3
28. Nxc3 Qb4 29. Qf3 Bg7 30. Rb1 Qe7 31. Bh3 Kh8 32. Be6 Rf8 33.
Qe2 Ne8 34. Qg4 Nd6

 

t+-+-T-J
Xx+-D-Lx
-+-Sb+x+
P-+pX-+-
-+-+-+q+
+-N-+-P-
-+-+-+-P
+r+-+-Bk

Black is trying to get sorted.

35. Qb4 Qf6 36. Bh3 a6 37. Bc5 Rad8 38. Rf1 Qg5
39. Bxd6 Rxf1+ 40. Bxf1 Qf6 (time) 0-1

 

Homer, SJ (2040) – Stokes, PC (Surrey Open )
(1905) (6) [E30] praxis: positional sacrifice in club play,
1988

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bg5 c5 5. d5 d6

[5… Bxc3+]

6. Rc1 e5 7. e3 Nbd7 8. Bd3 Qa5 9. Bxf6 Nxf6 10.
Nge2 b5

 

t+l+j+-T
X-+-+xXx
-+-X-S-+
DxXpX-+-
-Lp+-+-+
+-NbP-+-
pP-+nPpP
+-RqK-+r

11. O-O Bxc3 12. Nxc3 b4 13. Ne4 Nxe4 14. Bxe4 Qxa2 15. Qc2
Qa5 16. f4 exf4 17. Rxf4 Qd8 18. Rcf1 f6 19. Bxh7 Bd7 20. Qg6+ Kf8
21. Rxf6+ gxf6 22. Rxf6+ 1-0

 

Rudd, J (2200) – Williams, SJ (British
Championship) (2200) [C05] praxis: positional sacrifice in French
Defence, 1996

1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. f4 c5 6. c3 Nc6
7. Ndf3 Qb6 8. Ne2 cxd4 9. cxd4 f6 10. Nc3 Be7 11. Bd3 O-O 12.
a3

 

t+l+-Tj+
Xx+sL-Xx
-Ds+xX-+
+-+xP-+-
-+-P-P-+
P-Nb+n+-
-P-+-+pP
R-BqK-+r

12… fxe5 13. dxe5 Ndxe5!? 14. fxe5 Nxe5 15. Be2 Bd7!? 16.
Nxe5!? Qf2+ 17. Kd2 Qf4+ 18. Kc2 Qxe5 19. Bd3 d4 20. Ne2 Rf2 21.
Kb1 Rc8 22. Re1 Bb5 23. Bxb5 Qxb5

 

-+t+-+j+
Xx+-L-Xx
-+-+x+-+
+d+-+-+-
-+-X-+-+
P-+-+-+-
-P-+nTpP
RkBqR-+-

24. Nxd4?! Rxc1+ 25. Qxc1 Qd3+ 26. Nc2 Bg5 27. Qd1 Rd2 28.
Qxd2 Bxd2 29. Rd1 b5 30. Ra2 e5

 

-+-+-+j+
X-+-+-Xx
-+-+-+-+
+x+-X-+-
-+-+-+-+
P-+d+-+-
rPnL-+pP
+k+r+-+-

0-1

Book review: The Modern Chess Self-Tutor (Bronstein)

[This review first appeared in Westward Ho!]


The Modern Chess Self-Tutor

  David Bronstein, tr. Ken Neat

  ISBN 1-85744-136-2 Cadogan, 1995

  I buy chess books for instruction, for reference and for entertainment. This book I judge falls most neatly into the last category.

  Readers will recognise the usual Bronstein style – unconventional, entertaining, chatty; if you enjoyed the 200 Open Games anthology this will also suit you. However, I doubt if the author had a very clear idea about who he was writing this book for, since the topics and examples range from the trite to the magnificent.

  The blurb on the back says that this book “is not a self-tutor in the conventional sense, where the basics of the opening, middlegame and endgame play are drily explained. Instead the author engages in a frank conversation with the reader…”

  It’s all very interesting but can appear loose and self-indulgent. For example, Bronstein takes a page (17) to muse about why, after 1. e4 e5, it is most common to play 2. Nf3, without really answering his own question to my satisfaction. There are even places where Bronstein just wanders off into anecdotes about, say, buying second-hand books with Spassky in South America (p.108).

  Obviously, most of the text is a bit more focussed than that – Bronstein is usually both eloquent and engaging – but although the Chapter headings are enticing (The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Position, Coordination Of The Pieces, etc.) they are not given a lot of analytic bite. The many examples given are all nice, but occasionally fit the text poorly, in my view.

  For example, on page 51 Bronstein offers: “Everyone knows which piece so frightens the Black King – the White Queen’s Rook, awaiting its hour in the corner.” This is a pleasing aphorism. However, the next example given was:

t+l+tSj+
+x+-+xL-
-DxX-+x+
+-S-+-+-
-+pNp+-X
+pN-+-Pp
-+-R-PbK
Br+q+-+-

1…Rxa1! 2. Rxa1 Bxd4 3. Rxd4 Nxb3 4. Rxd6 Qxf2! since 5. Qxb3 allows a choice of either 5…Qxg3/6…Qxd6 or 5…hxg3+ mating.

  It’s a fine achievement from the youthful Bronstein but does it really clarify the point about attacking with Rooks? Recently I showed this game down at the club:

Whiteley – Agnos [A52] 1994

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e5 3. dxe5 Ng4 4. Nf3 Bc5 5. e3 Nc6 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O Ncxe5 8. Nxe5 Nxe5 9. Nc3 Re8 10. b3 a5 11. Bb2 Ra6

  “A hacker’s paradise” – CHESS magazine

12. Ne4 Ba7 13. Qd5 Rae6 The Rook pauses to support the Knight on the half-open e-file 14. Qxa5 Bb6 15. Qc3 Qh4 16. f4 Rh6

-+l+t+j+
+xXx+xXx
-L-+-+-T
+-+-S-+-
-+p+nP-D
+pQ-P-+-
pB-+b+pP
R-+-+rK-

We all knew that’s where it really wanted to go.

17. h3 d5 18. Ng5 Qg3 19. c5 Bxh3 20. Nxh3 Rxh3 21. Qe1 Qh2+ 22. Kf2 Bxc5 Resigns 0-1 23. Bd4 Qxf4+ 24. exf4 Bxd4# 1-0

  It’s a poorer-quality game but in my view better instructional material.

  In short, there is no sense that the book has been edited with sufficient vigour. You can probably get better instruction for your money from other books, whatever your standard, but if you fancy an interesting chat over some striking combinations with your favourite uncle, this is fine.

Is a doubled c-pawn worth a Bishop?

Is a doubled c-pawn worth a Bishop?

Peter Lane

This is one of the great themes of the Nimzo-Indian and French
Winawer. We will look at it in both contexts: First, the
Nimzo-Indian.

 

Doubled c-pawns and the Bishop pair in the
Nimzo-Indian


Spassky,B (2660) – Fischer,R (2785) (05)
[E41] Wch28-Reykjavik, 1972

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 c5 5. e3 Nc6 6. Bd3
Bxc3+

  This method, developed by Huebner, forces the exchange
before White can escape by castling. Black then creates a blockade
on the dark squares.

7. bxc3 d6 8. e4 e5

 

t+lDj+-T
Xx+-+xXx
-+sX-S-+
+-X-X-+-
-+pPp+-+
+-Pb+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-BqK-+r

Black tempts d4-d5.

9. d5 Ne7 10. Nh4 h6 11. f4

 

t+lDj+-T
Xx+-SxX-
-+-X-S-X
+-XpX-+-
-+p+pP-N
+-Pb+-+-
p+-+-+pP
R-BqK-+r

White tries to open up the King’s-side for attack, hoping to use
the Bishops.

11… Ng6!

  Black exchanges White’s remaining Knight, leaving White
with two Bishops but in a closed position where Bishops lack
scope.

Black is not tempted by [11…exf4 12. Bxf4 g5 13. e5
Ng4 14. e6! Nf6 15. Bg3 => with a strong attack]

12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Be3 b6 15. O-O
O-O 16. a4

 

t+lD-Tj+
X-+-+-X-
-X-+-SxX
+-XpX-+-
p+p+p+-+
+-PbB-+-
-+-+-+pP
R-+q+rK-

Still trying to get some play.

16… a5

  Another Black weakness but the last opportunity for White
to develop any activity. And if White cannot or does not attack b6,
it is not really weak!

17. Rb1 Bd7 18. Rb2 Rb8 19. Rbf2

  Perhaps White would have been better sticking to pressure
on the b-file.

19…Qe7 20. Bc2 g5 21. Bd2 Qe8 22. Be1
Qg6

 

-T-+-Tj+
+-+l+-X-
-X-+-SdX
X-XpX-X-
p+p+p+-+
+-P-+-+-
-+b+-RpP
+-+qBrK-

Only Black can undertake anything in this position.

Impertinent note from typist: when I first came
across this game as an example of weak pawns I was confused – whose
pawns are supposed to be weak? The answer really is White’s,
because his Bishops are hemmed in, and can neither easily defend
the White weaknesses nor attack the Black ones – hence the Black
weakness are more apparent than real.

23. Qd3 Nh5 24. Rxf8+ Rxf8 25. Rxf8+
Kxf8

  With the Rooks off White can only wait and defend.

26. Bd1 Nf4 27. Qc2??

 

-+-+-J-+
+-+l+-X-
-X-+-+dX
X-XpX-X-
p+p+pS-+
+-P-+-+-
-+q+-+pP
+-+bB-K-

Under pressure, White blunders.

27… Bxa4 0-1

 

  What does our noted theoretician, Nimzovitch himself,
have to say about this?

 

-+-+-+-+
XxX-+xXx
-+-X-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-+p+-+-
pPp+-PpP
+-+-+-+-

With this pawn formation White might plan c2-c3, d3-d4-d5, c3-c4,
b2-b4 and c4-c5.

 

-+-+-+-+
XxX-+xXx
-+-X-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-Pp+-+-
p+p+-PpP
+-+-+-+-

But here d4-d5 and c3-c4 can be met with …b7-b6. So this
formation lacks dynamism. But this dynamic weakness is
conter-balanced by a static strength, as a Pawn on d4 cannot be
forced to advance, being propped up by the c-Pawn. (However, adding
to this we see c4 is weak and hard to defend, and the a-pawn is
isolated. These factors lend Black an endgame advantage.

  We can now make a few comments about Spassky’s play:

  Firstly, White obligingly pushed d4-d5 blocking the game,
whereas any attempt by Black to exchange on d4 would open the
position for the Bishop pair.

  Secondly, the Knight’s development on f3 impedes the push
of the f-Pawn

  Thirdly, the rapid blocking tof the position by fxe5 and
a2-a4 worked against the Bishops.

  Lastly, a continued assault on b6 was needed to constrain
Black’s deployment in some way.

  Let us consider an alternative system of development
based upon the Deferred (Closed) Saemisch Variation, a sometime
recommendation of Keene, and a game with an interesting strategic
point.


Peter Lane – RJJ Gibbons, Exeter Vs.
Kingston, 1995

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5

  White loses a move playing a3 to force the chosen
formation.

5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 O-O

(too early? – DR’s notes from the Express and
Echo)

7. Bd3 d6 8. Ne2 e5 9. e4 Qc7

  White leaves the f-pawn free to advance; Black’s reply
avoids the pin on g5.

10. O-O Nc6

(Black is playing normal Nimzo-Indian moves, but
White’s opening (with Ne2 rather than Nf3) is too dangerous for
normal methods. …Ne8 and f5 was called for – DR)

11. f4 Bg4?

[11… cxd4 12. cxd4 Nxd4 13. Nxd4 exd4 14. Bb2 Qb6
15. Qc2 and e5]

  Anyone else want to call this a losing move? Note that
Black threatens to exchange on e2, and take at d4. If White takes
dxc5 and fxe5, c4 and e4 become vulnerable to the Knights.
Otherwise White must play d5 – but doesn’t this lead to a blocked
position with White’s Bishop ineffectual as we saw before?

12. d5! Ne7 13. f5!

  Isn’t the first commandment, “Bishop like open
spaces, Knights like closed positions
“? – But White controls
so much of the board, can you find a good square for a Knight? Note
that fxe5, “opening the position”, woud have been a serious error,
allowing …Nd6 and …Ba6.

13…Nd7 (else Bg5) 14. Qe1 Bxe2
15. Bxe2 f6 16. Qh4!

  Now Black sees the idea!

16…Rfd8 17. Rf3 Nf8 18. Rg3 Nc8?

  Dropping a vital Pawn, but:

[18…Nd7 19.Qh6 g6 20.fxg6 hxg6 21.Rh3;

18…Kh8 19.Bh6

A) 19…g5 20.Bxg5 fxg5 21.Qxg5 Neg6 22.fxg6 Nxg6
(22…hxg6 23.Rh3+ Kg8 24.Bg4) 23.h4;

B) 19…Ng8 20.Bxg7+;

18…Kf7 19.Bh5+ g6 20.fxg6+ hxg6 (20…Nexg6 21.Rf3
Qe7 22.Bg5 Nd7 23.Raf1 anyone fancy Black?) 21.Rf3 Ng8 22.Bxg6+
Kxg6 23.Rg3+ Kf7 24.Qh5+ Ke7 25.Rg7#]

19. Qxf6 Rd7 20. Qg5 Qd8

 

t+sD-Sj+
Xx+t+-Xx
-+-X-+-+
+-XpXpQ-
-+p+p+-+
P-P-+-R-
-+-+b+pP
R-B-+-K-

21. Qxd8 Rxd8 22. Bg5 Rd7 23. f6 Ng6 24. Bg4 Rc7 25. Be6+
Kh8 26. Rf1 gxf6 27. Bxf6+ Rg7 28. Bxg7+ Kxg7 29. Rf7+ 1-0

  The ‘interesting strategic point’ is that while the
Knights still always require outpost squares in blocked positions,
the Bishops can work around all but the tightest blockade to find a
diagonal (unless they are required for defence of pawns
attacked by active enemy Knights – DR
).

 


Lane, PC – Bartlett,J

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3
O-O 7. Bd3 d6 8. Ne2 e5 9. e4

 

tSlD-Tj+
Xx+-+xXx
-+-X-S-+
+-X-X-+-
-+pPp+-+
P-Pb+-+-
-+-+nPpP
R-BqK-+r

9… Re8 10. Ng3 Nc6 11. d5 Ne7

[11… Na5 12. Bg5 h6 13. Bxf6 Qxf6 14. Qa4]

12. Bg5 Ng6 13. Nh5 Bg4 14. Nxf6+ gxf6 15. Bxf6
Bxd1 16. Bxd8 Rexd8 17. Rxd1 Nf4 18. Bf1!

  Hanging on to the Bishop! 18… Kf8 19. g3 Nh5
20. Bh3

 

t+-T-J-+
Xx+-+x+x
-+-X-+-+
+-XpX-+s
-+p+p+-+
P-P-+-Pb
-+-+-P-P
+-+rK-+r

White went on to win: the ‘bad’ Bishop has a fine diagonal and the
Knight has no good squares.

…1-0

  The ideal structure for Black actually looks quite
different to the Huebner, with f7-f5 in place of d6/e5, and an
assault on e4, i.e. forget about blocking the Bishops, and instead
fight for chances in a more dynamic set-up.

 

Doubled c-pawns and the Bishop pair in the
French Winawer


Debbage, I – Lane, PC (Thamesdown vs.
Exeter)

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Qd7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3
b6 7. Qg4 f5 8. Qg3 Ba6 9. Bxa6 Nxa6 10. Qd3?!

[10. Ne2! Nb8!? 11. Nf4 Nc6! 12. Nxe6!?
“Discuss…”]

10… Nb8

[10… Qa4 prevents c4 11. Nf3 Ne7 12. Ng5 Kd7 13. h4
Nb8 14. Rg1 Nbc6 15. g4 Na5 16. Rb1 Nc4 White’s King’s-side
counterplay is not enough: -+ Atkinson-Cooke 1965]

11. Ne2 Nc6 12. O-O Na5 13. Nf4 Nc4 14. Qe2 O-O-O
15. Nd3 h6 16. a4 a5 17. Nb2 Qc6 18. Nxc4 Qxc4 19. Qxc4 dxc4 20.
f4?? Ne7 21. Rf3 Nd5

 

-+jT-+-T
+-X-+-X-
-X-+x+-X
X-+sPx+-
p+xP-P-+
+-P-+r+-
-+p+-+pP
R-B-+-K-

Black wins with a Queen’s-side advance: the Bishop is very bad and
the Knight holds sway on both sides of the board. As in the
Spassky-Fischer game, the White Pawns have become blocked and an
obstruction to his own pieces.

…0-1

 


Thomas, N – Lane, PC

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Qd7 5. Qg4 f5 6. Qh5+
Qf7 7. Qf3 b6 8. h4 Ba6 9. Bxa6 Nxa6 10. Qd3 Bxc3+ 11.
bxc3

[11. Qxc3]

11… Nb8 12. Nh3 Nc6

 

t+-+j+sT
X-X-+dXx
-Xs+x+-+
+-+xPx+-
-+-P-+-P
+-Pq+-+n
p+p+-Pp+
R-B-K-+r

13. c4!

  makes good use of the Queen on d3

[13. Nf4 Na5 and Black has achieved a favourable
blockade]

13… dxc4 14. Qxc4 Qd7

 

t+-+j+sT
X-Xd+-Xx
-Xs+x+-+
+-+-Px+-
-+qP-+-P
+-+-+-+n
p+p+-Pp+
R-B-K-+r

White’s Bishop still has some problems, and the struggle for
dominance by the minor pieces is still determined by the pawn
structure, the legacy of the exchange on c3.

15. Be3 Na5 16. Qb4 Qc6 17. Nf4 Ne7 18. c4 Nxc4
19. Rc1 b5 20. Nxe6 Nd5 21. Qc5 Qxc5 22. Nxc5 Kf7

 

t+-+-+-T
X-X-+jXx
-+-+-+-+
+xNsPx+-
-+sP-+-P
+-+-B-+-
p+-+-Pp+
+-R-K-+r

Dynamic equality: Black’s knights have achieved favourable outposts
but Black has not enough play on the Queen’s-side for a win, given
the backward c-pawn and strong White Knight. (The weak c-Pawn
prevents a5-b4-a4-b3 and White managed to create play on the
King’s-side.)

1/2-1/2

Summary

I find that in the Winawer, White’s small spatial advantage
allows Black’s Knights room to manoeuvre and blockade the doubled
Pawns. In the Nimzo-Indian it is harder for the Knights to get to
work.

  The Pawns are not good or bad in themselves, only
in how they determine the relative strengths of the opposing
pieces.

  Silman’s ‘Re-assess your chess’
advises:

  When considering an exchange of Bishop for Knight,
ask yourself:

  1. is the position open or closed?
  2. Will there be support points for the Knight(s)? and if
    so:

    1. can the Knight(s) get there?
    2. does it matter if they do? [i.e. are they away from the
      main arena of play?]
    3. what can you do in the meantime with the
      Bishop(s)?

Exeter Chess Club: Internet Chess Challenge

Press release

As part of the Centenary events organised by Exeter Chess Club, we recently (31st May 1996) held a team consultation match against Hafnarfjardar (near Reykjavic), from where came our distinguished visitor last year, Agust Karlsson. One main game, with 40 minutes each on the clock, and one ‘blitz’ game were played.

  Chess enthusiasts have set up free Internet Chess Servers (ICS) at various points around the world, and there is one in Britain at the University of Warwick (BICS). Although the Warwick machine understands only text messages, software has been written so that you can see a normal 2-D chessboard on your screen, and can make the moves using a mouse. We all had a screen each and when Agust and his team made their move, it appeared simultaneously on our screens in Exeter. The technology worked splendidly, but the teamwork left something to be desired at times and left the poor mouse operator being shouted at from all sides.

  We would like to thank the University of Exeter IT Services Unit, Director Laurie Burbridge, for the use of their computing facilities and for the help of Neil Brooks, Computing Development Officer, in setting up the match.

 


The teams played under the aliases of their two team captains, “freyr” is Bjorn Bjornsson, and DrDave is our own Dave Regis.

freyr – DrDave (main game) BICS, 1996

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6

  Our two resident experts in the Sicilian lobbied strongly for this line, hoping for…

[3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e5]

3. Bb5

  This is why we have only two players who persist with the Sicilian Defence; White has so many tricky ways to avoid it.

3… g6 4. Bxc6 dxc6

  Here the problems of democratic chess became apparent to DrDave: we had two votes for …bxc6, two for …dxc6, two didn’t care and two hadn’t got the screen set up right yet…

5. h3 Bg7 6. d3 e5 7. O-O f6

  We set up a solid wall of Pawns hoping to uncoil behind it, believing that White can’t rush us before we are ready.

8. Be3 b6 9. Qd2

  Putting an end to our hopes of playing …Nh6-f7.

9… Be6 10. a4 a5 11. Nc3 Ne7 12. Bh6 O-O 13. Bxg7 Kxg7 14. Nh4

 

t+-D-T-+
+-+-S-Jx
-Xx+lXx+
X-X-X-+-
p+-+p+-N
+-Np+-+p
-PpQ-Pp+
R-+-+rK-

White telegraphs an intention to attack the King by opening the f-file; we weren’t too worried by this, and took the opportunity to undouble the c-pawns and weaken the d-pawn.

… c4 15. f4 cxd3 16. cxd3 Qd4+ 17. Kh1 Rad8 18. Rf3 exf4 19. Qxf4 f5

  Relieving the pressure on the f-file.

20. Qg5 Qf6 21. Qxf6+ Rxf6 22. Raf1

 

-+-T-+-+
+-+-S-Jx
-Xx+lTx+
X-+-+x+-
p+-+p+-N
+-Np+r+p
-P-+-+p+
+-+-+r+k

The game was adjourned here so the Icelanders could reconnect their ‘phone and order pizza!

22… Rff8 23. Kg1 Bc8 24. exf5 Nxf5 25. Nxf5+ Rxf5 26. Re3 Rxf1+ 27. Kxf1

 

-+lT-+-+
+-+-+-Jx
-Xx+-+x+
X-+-+-+-
p+-+-+-+
+-NpR-+p
-P-+-+p+
+-+-+k+-

The exchanges have left Black with the small advantages of Bishop against Knight and pressure against the isolated d-pawn.

27… Ba6 28. Ke2 Rd7 29. Kd2 Kf6 30. Ne4+ Kf5 31. Kc3 c5 32. Rf3+ Ke5 33. Nf6 Rd4?!

  No need for this, but we had about a minute left to our opponents’ twenty, and democracy had started to break down…

[33… Rxd3+? engaged us for a while but 34. Rxd3 Bxd3 35. Ng4+ Ke4 36. Nf2+ leaves White a piece up.]

34. Nxh7 Rxa4 35. Nf8 Bb7?? 36. Nxg6+

  and the endgame held no more worries for White…

36… Kd6 37. Rf6+ Kc7 38. Nf4 Ra1 39. h4 Rc1+ 40. Kd2 Rb1 41. Kc2 Rh1 42. h5 Rh2 43. Rg6 b5 44. h6 c4 45. Rg7+ Kb6 46. h7 cxd3+ 47. Kxd3 a4 48. g4 b4 49. Nh5 a3 50. bxa3 bxa3 51. h8=Q a2 52. Qd8+ Ka6 53. Rg6+ Black resigned 1-0

 


DrDave – freyr (return game) BICS, 1996

for the return game we had 15 minutes each.

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5

  The Benko Gambit

4. cxb5 a6 5. Nc3 axb5 6. e4 b4 7. Nb5 d6 8. Bc4

 

tSlDjL-T
+-+-XxXx
-+-X-S-+
+nXp+-+-
-Xb+p+-+
+-+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
R-BqK-Nr

The infamous “Nescafe-Frappe Attack”, in which we had been expertly tutored by team member Steve Homer in a recent coaching session.

8… g6 9. e5 dxe5 10. d6 exd6 11. Bg5 Na6 12. Qf3

  Our opponents mournfully typed in, “We seem to have overlooked something.”

12… e4 13. Qxf6 Qxf6 14. Bxf6 Rg8 15. O-O-O 1-0

  Revenge is sweet, but not fattening.

The Ulvestad Variation of the Two Knights’ Defence

From minkler@buffnet.net Sat May 4 03:51:23 1996

Subject: The Dreaded Fried Liver attack ….

[Impertinent editorial note: I think the Fried
Liver Attack should refer to only the line 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3
Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nxf7
, but here my
esteemed correspondent means the line with 4. Ng5
– Dr.Dave]

  In my quest at becoming a better player (USCF 1360) I was
constantly faced with the Fried Liver attack as black. After losing
the game several times I finally got off my butt to learn the
stupid thing…And, what I found was striking. First off black
should have nothing to fear from Ng5. In fact he can practically
laugh at it. I have enclosed some games from the local club here
where me and my uncle have done extensive research on the Ulvestad
Var. of the Two Knight’s Defense. If you have MCO- 13 the page is
111. But, what I found its that people DON’T play these lines…
And give black a perfectly healthy game.

  If you would like to see the rest of Ng5_1 where my Uncle
John Powell Defeated the Master his E-mail address is
[…]

  I think that these lines would be very useful to you web
page and chess club…

 [Appreciative editorial note: I
agree!]

 

Jarret Minkler


t+lDjL-T
X-X-+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+x+pX-N-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
pPpP-PpP
RnBqK-+r

6. Bxb5 Qxd5 7. Bf1 Bc5 8. Nc3
{This is a game my uncle played vs. a 2050 USCF my uncle is 1500+}
8... Bxf2+ 9. Ke2
{And Black goes on to win...}
*



The Italian Game for beginners

UPDATE 15th May 2011:
ChessBase version [zipped] generously provided by Robert Jannink. Thanks a million!

  The Giuoco Piano and Evans’ Gambit

An Exeter Junior Chess Club booklet

  Edition 3.18, April, 96

  Bibliography:

 

  Kasparov/Keene, Batsford Chess Openings

  Levy/Keene, An Opening Repertoire for the Attacking
Club Player

  Walker, Chess Openings for Juniors

Various magazines and other books

 


Introduction

This is an updated and expanded version of a booklet first
written in 1994. The major change is the conversion of the `example
games’ section to a much larger `ideas and traps’ section.


The trouble with the Giuoco
Piano (is the Giuoco Pianissimo)

The name Giuoco Piano means ‘quiet game’, but it is not
really quiet. When it got its name, people were still playing the
bloodthirsty variations of the King’s Gambit like the Muzio
Gambit
(1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. O-O
gxf3 6. Qxf3
). Compared to that, I suppose the Giuoco Piano
is quiet! But there is a variation to be avoided,
which is the Giuoco Pianissimo. That means ‘very quiet
game’.

  It looks like this:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. d3
d6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+sX-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-Np+n+-
pPp+-PpP
R-BqK-+r

Junior players can usually get to this point safely but often don’t
really enjoy the game that results. The position is blocked, the
sides are equal and it’s hard to get things going. It can take a
long time to beat worse players because things are so solid. Also,
it may be that almost every game you play ends up something like
this, and perhaps you would like some variety.

  Why does this go wrong? Well, you should know that Plan A
in the opening (for White and Black) is to play e4 and d4. If you
both play sensibly 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 White
cannot play d4, so you both continue sensibly 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. d3
d6
. Which is where we came in. If you really want to play like
this, see the last section, but I don’t think it’s a good way to
play.

  Knowing this can happen, you need to know the two great
ways to avoid it, which lead to open exciting games:

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-P-+n+-
pP-P-PpP
RnBqK-+r

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4.c3

  This is the main line of the Giuoco Piano. The idea is to
play c3, d4 and only after …exd4,cxd4 do you play Nc3. You then
have your old-fashioned centre and good prospects of a quick attack
down the centre or on the K-side. I often call this Plan
A
.

  Black can use the temporary weakness of e4 to play
4…Nf6 when it is difficult to stop Black upsetting your plan a
little.

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-L-X-+-
-Pb+p+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+pP-PpP
RnBqK-+r

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4.b4!?

  This is the Evans’ Gambit, the “gift of the gods to a
languishing chess world
“. After 4…Bxb4, 5. c3 Bc5 6.
d4
you have gained a move on Plan A, although you are a Pawn
down. The Evans’ is more dangerous than the Giuoco Piano – for both
sides!

  Enterprising chess players still occasionally trot this
one out at master level: Bobby Fischer and John Nunn have played it
with success.

  So, let’s have a look at some ideas in these more
exciting lines. I’ll show you

  1. first, the basic ideas

  2. secondly, some important traps

  3. lastly, some variations

  You should read and play over the examples with a board,
and do them in the order above: (1) ideas, (2) traps, and only then
(3) variations. This is how to study any opening.


Basic ideas in the Italian
Game

I’ve described some of them above.

  bring your Bishop onto the a2-g8 diagonal, eyeing up the
tender f7 point

  play c2-c3 and d2-d4 to take over the
centre

develop your other pieces
rapidly, bring your King’s Rook to e1. If you have
a lead in development, break open lines to get at
the Black position

  keep the opponent’s pieces from settling with
central pawn stabs. Usually we say, don’t make
time-wasting pawn moves, like h2-h3. But if you play e4-e5
attacking a Knight on f6, the Knight has to move, and so you
haven’t given Black a chance to catch up in development, and you
may have dislodged an important defender. It’s odd that, because
Pawns are worth the least, nothing can resist their attacks!

  try and catch the opponent’s King in the
middle
, or, if it escapes by castling, attack on
the King’s-side.
. Usually, only the Evans’ Gambit and
Moller Attack in the Giuoco Piano are fast enough to catch the King
in the middle.

  if your attack doesn’t come about, fast development and
siezing the central files may give you an advantage in the
endgame

  Because the basic layout is similar for both sides, some
of these ideas also apply to playing Black: in addition Black
should strive for:

  rapid development

castle into safety

  counter with …d5

  play for counterattack on the
King’s-side or an endgame advantage First, I’ll
show you an example game which includes the ideas I have listed
above.


All the basic ideas: White,R –
Al Marif,S [C51 Evans’ Gambit] (London LB), 1990

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Bc5 6.
O-O!? d6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4

 

t+lDj+sT
XxX-+xXx
-+sX-+-+
+-L-+-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

Central advantage: the Plan A pawn centre with
good development.

8…Bb6 9. Re1

  The Rook comes to e1, gving the King a Hard Stare.

9…Bg4

 

t+-Dj+sT
XxX-+xXx
-LsX-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bPp+l+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqR-K-

White’s next points both Bishops at the King’s-side.

10. Bb2 Qf6 11. e5 dxe5 12. dxe5

 

t+-+j+sT
XxX-+xXx
-Ls+-D-+
+-+-P-+-
-+b+-+l+
+-+-+n+-
pB-+-PpP
Rn+qR-K-

Raiding by centre pawns. The Pawn wins time by the
attack on the Queen, and then breaks open lines by
a further step forward.

12… Qf4 13. e6 Bxf3

  Black hopes to gain time by taking a piece with an attack
on the Queen.

 

t+-+j+sT
XxX-+xXx
-Ls+p+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+-D-+
+-+-+l+-
pB-+-PpP
Rn+qR-K-

14. exf7+

  Not a bit of it! – Check stops everything. In fact White
never moves the Queen or takes the Bishop!

 

t+-+j+sT
XxX-+pXx
-Ls+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+-D-+
+-+-+l+-
pB-+-PpP
Rn+qR-K-

Attack on f7 along the “Italian Diagonal”

14… Kf8 15. fxg8=Q+ Rxg8 16. Ba3+ Ne7 17.
Bxe7+

 

t+-+-Jt+
XxX-B-Xx
-L-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+-D-+
+-+-+l+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+qR-K-

The King caught in the middle. Black resigns…
1-0

  An exciting game! Let’s have a look at each of these
ideas again in actual play, and how to play when you are Black.


Ideas mainly for White


Develop rapidly and take over
the centre

You should know this idea already. Get your pieces out and fighting
– if they are on the back rank you might as well not have them! And
of course, they are most effective in the centre.

  The way to take over the centre is with your e- and
d-pawns. These pawns can make little steps down the middle towards
the Black King, and on the way stamp on the toes of the Black
pieces to make them jump out of the way!


The raid with central pawns:
Boleslavsky – Scitov [C54 Giuoco Piano] (Moscow) 1933

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-Ls+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

This move gives White too much of a free hand. The “Plan A” pawn
centre just rolls over the Black position.

7. e5 Stamp!

7…Ng4 8. h3 Stamp!

8…Nh6 9. d5 Stamp!

9…Ne7 10. d6 Stamp!

10…Ng6

  The Pawns have marched forward, causing the Black pieces
to scatter. Time to develop a piece…

11. Bg5 f6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+-Xx
-L-P-XsS
+-+-P-B-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+n+p
pP-+-Pp+
Rn+qK-+r

12. exf6 gxf6

  White can win a piece, but:

13. Qe2+ Kf8 14. Bxh6# 1-0

 

  Isn’t that better than the Giuoco Pianissimo?


The raid with central pawns:
Morphy,Paul – Laroche,H [Evans’ Gambit, C52] Paris, 1859

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4
Nf6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

Now a little Pawn stab.

7. dxe5 Ng4 8. Bg5 f6 9. exf6 Nxf6 10.
e5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+-Xx
-+s+-S-+
L-+-P-B-
-+b+-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+qK-+r

Another awkward Pawn raid.

10… h6 11. exf6 hxg5 12. fxg7 Qe7+ 13. Qe2
1-0

 


The raid with central pawns:
Morphy,Paul(bl_sim) – Cunningham [Giuoco Piano, C54] London,
1859

1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Bc5 3. c3 Nc6 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. e5
Qe7 7. O-O Ng8 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. d5

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXxDxXx
-Ls+-+-+
+-+pP-+-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

This we would call a central pawn roller.

9… Qc5 10. Na3 Nd4 11. Be3 Nxf3+ 12. Qxf3 Qf8
13. Bxb6 axb6 14. Nb5 Kd8 15. Rac1

 

t+lJ-DsT
+xXx+xXx
-X-+-+-+
+n+pP-+-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+q+-
pP-+-PpP
+-R-+rK-

Black is getting squashed by those Pawns.

15… d6 16. exd6 cxd6 17. Qe3 Ra6 18. Nc7
Qe7

 

-+lJ-+sT
+xN-DxXx
tX-X-+-+
+-+p+-+-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-Q-+-
pP-+-PpP
+-R-+rK-

Black wants to exchange Queens.

19. Ne6+! fxe6 20. Bxa6 Bd7 21. Bb5 Ke8 22. dxe6
Nf6 23. Rc8+ 1-0


Central advantage:
Bastian,Herbert – Eng,Holger (10) [Giuoco Piano, C54] Bad Neuenahr
ch-DE, 1984

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Bd2 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Qb3 Nce7 11. O-O O-O
12. Rfe1

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxX-SxXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+s+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+q+-+n+-
pP-N-PpP
R-+-R-K-

This is the Main line position. Most of the Pawns have disappeared,
but Black must be careful not to let the White pieces dominate the
central squares and the e-file.

12… Nb6 13. Bd3 Bf5 14. Rxe7 Bxd3 15. Rae1 Bg6
16. Nh4 Nc8

 

t+sD-Tj+
XxX-RxXx
-+-+-+l+
+-+-+-+-
-+-P-+-N
+q+-+-+-
pP-N-PpP
+-+-R-K-

White has far more active pieces and control of the e-file. This is
an easy game to understand, and, hopefully, imitate.

17. Nxg6 hxg6 18. R7e5 Qxd4 19. Nf3 Qd7 20. Ng5
Nd6

 

t+-+-Tj+
XxXd+xX-
-+-S-+x+
+-+-R-N-
-+-+-+-+
+q+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
+-+-R-K-

Black is starting to get sorted out but White’s next move tempts
the f-pawn to move…

21. Qb4 f6 22. Re7 Qb5 23. Rxg7+ Kxg7 24. Re7+
Rf7 25. Rxf7+ Nxf7 26. Ne6+ 1-0



Catch the Black King in the
middle

As I said, this is mostly an idea for the Evans’ Gambit. White’s
pieces charge out before Black can play …Nf6 and …O-O, and
before the defence can get organised.


The King caught in the middle
(and Central advantage): Morphy – Hampton, H [Evans’ Gambit, C52]
(London) 1858

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Bc5 6. O-O
d6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Nc3

 

t+lDj+sT
XxX-+xXx
-LsX-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-N-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

This simple developing move is best, but not much played before
Morphy. Instead they used to rush with 9. d5 or hesitate
with 9. h3.

9… Nf6 10. e5 dxe5 11. Ba3

  Stops the Black King castling.

11…Bg4 12. Qb3 Bh5 13. dxe5 Ng4 14. Rad1
Qc8

 

t+d+j+-T
XxX-+xXx
-Ls+-+-+
+-+-P-+l
-+b+-+s+
BqN-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+-+r+rK-

White has a model position, while Black’s pieces are disorganised
and the King vulnerable.

15. e6 f6 16. Qb5 Bg6 17. Bd5 1-0

 


King caught in the middle:
Fischer – Fine RH [Evans’ Gambit, C52] (New York) 1963

This game was played as a ‘friendly’ game at Fine’s house.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3
Ba5 6. d4 exd4 7. O-O dxc3

  “A little too greedy“, said Modern Chess
Openings
, and Fischer agreed.

8. Qb3 Qe7 9. Nxc3

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXxDxXx
-+s+-+-+
L-+-+-+-
-+b+p+-+
+qN-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-B-+rK-

White has a massive lead in development. Now 9…Qb4 is
the most awkward. Fischer’s reply does not lose time because Black
must respond to the attack on the Queen, and, after the exchange,
the Knight.

9… Nf6 10. Nd5 Nxd5 11. exd5 Ne5 12. Nxe5 Qxe5
13. Bb2 Qg5

 

t+l+j+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-+-+
L-+p+-D-
-+b+-+-+
+q+-+-+-
pB-+-PpP
R-+-+rK-

Fischer now finds a nice deflecting move.

14. h4 Qxh4 15. Bxg7 Rg8 16. Rfe1+ Kd8 17.
Qg3

 

t+lJ-+t+
XxXx+xBx
-+-+-+-+
L-+p+-+-
-+b+-+-D
+-+-+-Q-
p+-+-Pp+
R-+-R-K-

1-0

  Another, conclusive deflection. The Black Queen cannot
defend the f6 square, so if 17…Qg3 18. Bf6 mate.



King caught in the middle:
Anderssen,Adolf – Dufresne,J
[Evans’ Gambit, C52] Berlin ‘Evergreen’, 1852

This is a very famous game, published in newspapers all over the
world at the time.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3
Ba5 6. d4 exd4 7. O-O d3 8. Qb3 Qf6 9. e5 Qg6 10. Re1 Nge7 11. Ba3
b5 12. Qxb5 Rb8 13. Qa4 Bb6 14. Nbd2 Bb7 15. Ne4 Qf5 16. Bxd3 Qh5
17. Nf6+ gxf6 18. exf6 Rg8

 

-T-+j+t+
XlXxSx+x
-Ls+-P-+
+-+-+-+d
q+-+-+-+
B-Pb+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+-R-K-

In playing his next move, Anderssen must have seen the mate at the
end. Superb!

19. Rad1 Qxf3 20. Rxe7+ Nxe7 21. Qxd7+ Kxd7 22.
Bf5+ Ke8 23. Bd7+ Kf8 24. Bxe7# 1-0


King caught in the middle:
Romero Holmes,Alfonse – Estremera Panos,Serg [Giuoco Piano, C54]
Leon, 1989

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6.
b4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-+-+-
-PbXp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

An unusual line.

6… Bb6 7. e5 d5 8. exf6 dxc4 9. b5
Na5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-L-+-P-+
Sp+-+-+-
-+xX-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

White has yet to show anything for his efforts.

10. Qe2+ Be6 11. fxg7 Rg8 12. Nxd4 Bxd4 13. cxd4
Qxd4 14. Bb2

 

t+-+j+t+
XxX-+xPx
-+-+l+-+
Sp+-+-+-
-+xD-+-+
+-+-+-+-
pB-+qPpP
Rn+-K-+r

This move hangs on to the g-pawn, without which Black would be OK.
It’s still all very muddly!

14… Qd3 15. Bf6 Qg6 16. Qf3 Rxg7 17.
Nd2

 

t+-+j+-+
XxX-+xTx
-+-+lBd+
Sp+-+-+-
-+x+-+-+
+-+-+q+-
p+-N-PpP
R-+-K-+r

Black jumps at a loose Pawn…

17… Qxg2 18. Qa3 1-0


The King’s-side
attack.

Of course, if Black is not greedy you may see the Black King flee
to the King’s-side. But all the things that make the attack on the
uncastled King work – better development, central control and open
lines – also make a King’s-side attack work!



King’s-side attack: Morphy,Paul –
Amateur [Giuoco Piano,
C51] London, 1858

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Bc5 6. d4
exd4 7. cxd4 Bb6 8. Bg5 Nge7 9. Nc3 O-O 10. d5 Na5

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxXxSxXx
-L-+-+-+
S-+p+-B-
-+b+p+-+
+-N-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+qK-+r

Black has castled, but White is still out get the King.

11. d6 cxd6 12. Nd5 Nac6 13. Nxe7+ Nxe7 14. Qxd6
Re8 15. Rc1 Ba5+

 

t+lDt+j+
Xx+xSxXx
-+-Q-+-+
L-+-+-B-
-+b+p+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+-R-K-+r

White’s next move is an important one: he will have to win the game
without his King’s Rook!

16. Kf1 Kf8 17. Qf4 d5 18. Bb5 Bd7 19.
Ne5

 

t+-DtJ-+
Xx+lSxXx
-+-+-+-+
Lb+xN-B-
-+-+pQ-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
+-R-+k+r

A well-judged sacrifice.

19… Bxb5+ 20. Kg1 f5 21. exf5 Qb6 22. f6 Ng8
23. f7 Rec8 24. fxg8=Q+ Kxg8 25. Qf7+

 

t+t+-+j+
Xx+-+qXx
-D-+-+-+
Ll+xN-B-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
+-R-+-Kr

White has got his attack going nicely now.

25… Kh8 26. Rxc8+ Rxc8 27. Qxd5 h6 28. Nf7+ Kh7
29. Qf5+ Qg6 30. Qxc8 Qb1+ 31. Qc1 Qf5 32. Be3 Qxf7 33. Qb1+
1-0



Littlewood – Paish (Blindfold)1993

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Bd2 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Qb3! Nce7 11. O-O
O-O

12. Rfe1 c6 13. a4

  Fritz knows about several alternatives here: h6, Qb6,Qb7,
Rb8, b6 and so on. Littlewood’s opponent found a new one, but the
decentralising …Qa5 does little towards getting Black’s position
sorted.

13… Qa5 14. Ne4 Rd8 15. Ne5 Nf5 16. Qd3 Be6 17.
Ng5 g6 18. Qh3 Nd6 19. Qxh7+

 

t+-T-+j+
Xx+-+x+q
-+xSl+x+
D-+sN-N-
p+bP-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-P-+-PpP
R-+-R-K-

The entry of the Queen decides.

19… Kf8 20. Nxe6+ fxe6 21. Bxd5 and Nxg6+
1-0

  This was one of eight games played blindfold by Paul –
that is, he played by calling out moves to eight opponents, each of
whom had a board!


King’s-side attack: Euwe,Max –
O’Hanlon,John [Giuoco Piano, C54] Hastings, 1919

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O Bxc3 9. d5 Bf6 10. Re1 Ne7 11. Rxe4 d6 12.
Bg5 Bxg5 13. Nxg5 O-O

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxX-SxXx
-+-X-+-+
+-+p+-N-
-+b+r+-+
+-+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
R-+q+-K-

White now plays a break-up sacrifice.

14. Nxh7! Kxh7 15. Rh4+ Kg8 16. Qh5 f5 17. Re1
Ng6 18. Rh3 f4 19. Re6 Rf6

 

t+lD-+j+
XxX-+-X-
-+-XrTs+
+-+p+-+q
-+b+-X-+
+-+-+-+r
pP-+-PpP
+-+-+-K-

Black has no time to organise a defence of all of his weaknesses.

20. Qh7+ Kf8 21. Qh8+ Nxh8 22. Rxh8+ Kf7 23. Rxd8
c6 24. Ree8 Bd7 25. dxc6+ Be6 26. Bxe6+ Rxe6 27. Rxa8 Rxe8 28. Rxe8
Kxe8 29. cxb7 1-0


The Fried Liver raid:
Morphy,Paul(bl_sim) – Forde,A [Evans’ Gambit, C52] New Orleans,
1858

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. O-O
Nge7 7. Ng5 d5 8. exd5 Nxd5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+s+-+-+
L-+sX-N-
-+b+-+-+
+-P-+-+-
p+-P-PpP
RnBq+rK-

You may know the Fried Liver Attack – here is a version of it in
the Evans’ Gambit.

9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. Qf3+ Ke6 11. Ba3 Bb6 12. Re1
Na5

 

t+lD-+-T
XxX-+-Xx
-L-+j+-+
S-+sX-+-
-+b+-+-+
B-P-+q+-
p+-P-PpP
Rn+-R-K-

How can White get at the King?

13. Rxe5+! Kxe5 14. d4+ Ke6 15. g4 g6 16. Qe4+
Kf7 17. Bxd5+ Kg7 18. Be7 Re8 19. Qe5+ Kh6 20. g5+ Kh5 21. Bf3+ Bg4
22. Qg3 Qd7 23. Qh3# 1-0

  This too was one of a number of games played by Morphy
without sight of the board.


The Queen’s-side
attack.

Black’s Queen’s-side may be late coming out, and may be a target
for a direct attack by e.g. Qd1-b3xb7. But if the Black King cannot
feel entirely safe on the King’s-side, and not at all in the
centre, perhaps your opponent will castle Queen’s-side? This is
usually easier to attack than the King’s-side, because you won’t
mind moving your Queen’s-side Pawns forward!



Move to the Queen’s-side: Szecsi –
Szarka [Giuoco Piano,
C54] cr, 1987

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O Bxc3 9. d5 Bf6 10. Re1 Ne7 11. Rxe4 d6 12.
Bg5 Bxg5 13. Nxg5 h6 14. Qe2 hxg5 15. Re1 Be6 16. dxe6 f6 17. Re3
c6 18. Rh3 Rxh3 19. gxh3 g6 20. b4

 

t+-Dj+-+
Xx+-S-+-
-+xXpXx+
+-+-+-X-
-Pb+-+-+
+-+-+-+p
p+-+qP-P
+-+-R-K-

This move is quite cute: White realises Black will castle
Queen’s-side, and so arranges a welcome for the Black King…

20… Qb6 21. Qb2 O-O-O

  Told you!

22. b5 Rf8 23. a4 Qa5 24. Rc1 Qxa4 25. bxc6 b6
26. Bb5 Qe4 27. c7 Kb7 28. Qa3 a5 29. Qxd6

 

-+-+-T-+
+jP-S-+-
-X-QpXx+
Xb+-+-X-
-+-+d+-+
+-+-+-+p
-+-+-P-P
+-R-+-K-

Black is cut to shreds. It’s an interesting point that this was
played in recent years by post, so Black had plenty of time to work
out the best opening variation and the best defence to the attack!

1-0


Ideas for Black

Of course, you need to know how to play the Black side of the
Italian Game.


Hit back with …d5

This is the most important idea. Black’s problems in the games we
have looked at stem from (a) poor development, (b) poor control
over the centre.

  The …d5 break is crucial, releasing the Bc8 and getting
a share of the centre (or at least breaking up White’s pawns). This
goes some way to solving both problems. If you can play …d5 as
Black without immediate disaster you usually get an even game at
least.


Black hits back with …d5:
Marache,N – Morphy,Paul [Evans’ Gambit, C52] New York,
1857

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4
exd4 7. e5

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
L-+-P-+-
-+bX-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

White swings a punch into the air. Black responds with one on the
chin.

7… d5 8. exd6 Qxd6 9. O-O Nge7 10. Ng5 O-O 11.
Bd3

 

t+l+-Tj+
XxX-SxXx
-+sD-+-+
L-+-+-N-
-+-X-+-+
+-Pb+-+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

White has no reason to expect these attacking gestures to succeed.
Black sensibly develops, connecting the Rooks, and soon moves over
to the attack.

11… Bf5 12. Bxf5 Nxf5 13. Ba3 Qg6 14. Bxf8 Qxg5
15. Ba3 dxc3 16. Bc1 Qg6 17. Bf4 Rd8 18. Qc2 Ncd4 19.
Qe4

 

-+-T-+j+
XxX-+xXx
-+-+-+d+
L-+-+s+-
-+-SqB-+
+-X-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+-+rK-

19… Ng3! 0-1

A neat finish: Black attacks the
White Queen (twice) and threatens mate by …Nde2#.


Black hits back with …d5:
Treiber,Timo – Kurz,Ralf (07) [Giuoco Piano, C54] Baden Baden,
1990

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O Bxc3 9. d5 Bf6 10. dxc6 bxc6 11.
Re1

 

t+lDj+-T
X-Xx+xXx
-+x+-L-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+s+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-BqR-K-

Black whips the King out of the way of the Rook…

11… O-O 12. Rxe4

 

t+lD-Tj+
X-Xx+xXx
-+x+-L-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+r+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-Bq+-K-

12… d5

  …And the …d5 blow recovers the piece.

13. Rf4 dxc4 14. Qa4 c3 15. bxc3 Bxc3 16. Rb1
Qd3

 

t+l+-Tj+
X-X-+xXx
-+x+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
q+-+-R-+
+-Ld+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+rB-+-K-

White is getting into a right mess.

17. Rbb4

[17. Qb3 Rb8 18. Rd4 Rxb3 19. Rxd3 Rxb1]

17… Ba6 18. Rbc4 Bxc4 19. Rxc4 Rab8
0-1


Catch the White King in the
middle

If you are developing as fast as you can, and White isn’t, you may
find that you are ahead in development. In this case you have every
right to attack the White King, and if this is still in the middle,
so much the better!


Black catches the King in the
middle: Noa,Josef – Kopylov [Evans’ Gambit, C52] Leningrad,
1937

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4
d6 7. Bg5 Nf6 8. Qa4 exd4 9. Nxd4 Bb6 10. Bb5 O-O 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12.
Bxc6

 

t+lD-Tj+
X-X-+xXx
-LbX-S-+
+-+-+-B-
q+-+p+-+
+-P-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+-K-+r

White has tried to cash in straight away before completing
development.

12… Bxf2+ 13. Ke2

[13. Kxf2 Ng4+ 14. Kf1 Qxg5 15. Bxa8 Qc1+ 16. Ke2
Qxh1]

13… Rb8 14. Rf1 Rb2+ 15. Nd2

 

-+lD-Tj+
X-X-+xXx
-+bX-S-+
+-+-+-B-
q+-+p+-+
+-P-+-+-
pT-NkLpP
R-+-+r+-

Black now finds a neat move to exploit White’s loose position.

15… Nxe4! 16. Qxe4 Qxg5 17. Kxf2 Bf5 18. Qf3
Bg4 19. Qe4 d5 0-1


Counterattack on the White
King’s-side

Similarly, if you are ahead in development or have some other
advantage, you can (and should!) think about a King’s-side attack.


Black’s King’s-side
counterattack: Mongredien,A – Morphy,Paul (07) [Evans’ Gambit, C52]
Paris m, 1859

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. O-O
Nf6 7. d4 O-O

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

White tries a pawn stab, but things are pretty solid. No quick raid
will be possible, which is bad news for the Gambit player.

8. d5 Ne7 9. Qd3 d6 10. h3 Ng6 11. Nh2 Nh5 12.
Bb3 Ngf4 13. Bxf4 Nxf4 14. Qf3 f5

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxX-+-Xx
-+-X-+-+
L-+pXx+-
-+-+pS-+
+bP-+q+p
p+-+-PpN
Rn+-+rK-

This move announces to White that it is Black who holds the
initiative.

15. exf5 Bxf5 16. g4 Bd3 17. Qe3 Bb6 18. Qd2 Qh4
0-1


Black’s King’s-side
counterattack: Saint Amant – Morphy,Paul [Giuoco Piano, C54] Paris,
1858

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Bd2 Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. O-O O-O

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxX-+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+s+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-N-PpP
R-+q+rK-

White follows the limp 10. O-O with a time-wasting and weakening
Pawn move.

11. h3 Nf4 12. Kh2 Nxd4 13. Nxd4 Qxd4 14. Qc2
Qd6

 

t+l+-Tj+
XxX-+xXx
-+-D-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+b+-S-+
+-+-+-+p
pPqN-PpK
R-+-+r+-

Threatening several nasties.

15. Kh1 Qh6 16. Qc3 Bf5 17. Kh2 Rad8 18.
Rad1

 

-+-T-Tj+
XxX-+xXx
-+-+-+-D
+-+-+l+-
-+b+-S-+
+-Q-+-+p
pP-N-PpK
+-+r+r+-

“And now for my last trick:”

18… Bxh3 19. gxh3 Rd3 20. Qxd3 Nxd3 21. Bxd3
Qd6+ 22. f4 Qxd3 0-1

 


Black’s chances in the
endgame

It is actually quite difficult to take over the attack and mate
White. This is nearly always true if the Queens are exchanged. But
very often, once White’s initiative blows itself out, you may be
left with better placed pieces. Then there may be open lines that
you can use to attack White Pawns. White may have given up a pawn
for the attack, or may have advanced one or two Pawns beyond easy
reach of White’s pieces, but within easy reach of yours. Then Black
can look forward to a very promising endgame.


Black’s endgame chances:
Hammond,G – Morphy,Paul [Giuoco Piano, C54] New York, 1857

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6.
e5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-P-+-
-+bX-+-+
+-P-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

As ever, Black must hit back hard:

6… d5 7. Bb3 Ne4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. O-O Bg4 10. Be3
O-O 11. Qd3 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Ng5 13. Qf5

 

t+-D-Tj+
XxX-+xXx
-Ls+-+-+
+-+xPqS-
-+-P-+-+
+b+-Bp+-
pP-+-P-P
Rn+-+rK-

White is doing his best to attack.

13… Nxd4 14. Bxd4 Bxd4 15. Nc3 g6 16. Qg4 h5
17. Qg2 Bxe5 18. Nxd5 c6 19. Rfe1 Re8 20. f4 cxd5 21. fxe5 Ne6 22.
Qxd5 Qxd5 23. Bxd5 Nf4 24. Bxb7 Rab8 25. Bc6 Re6 26. Bd7 Re7 27.
Rad1 Rxb2

 

-+-+-+j+
X-+bTx+-
-+-+-+x+
+-+-P-+x
-+-+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
pT-+-P-P
+-+rR-K-

The attack has blown out leaving Black’s pieces very well placed.
White is losing at least a Pawn…

28. Re4? Rxd7 0-1

  …if not the game!


Some traps in the Italian
Game

I hope that’s given you a feel for the way to play these positions.
Now I’d like to look at some specific variations, because in these
lively lines you have to watch your step! Here are some of the most
important traps, the tactical ideas behind some of the main lines.

  These are taken `wholemeal’ (rather than piecemeal) from
Znosko-Borovsky’s Traps on the Chessboard. I think this is
out of print (I have a 1940s copy) but worth trying to find if you
read descriptive notation. In fact, that goes for all
Z-B’s books! Many of them are issued in inexpensive editions by
Dover.


A poor line for White in the
Closed Variation of the Giuoco Piano

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Qe7 5. O-O?!

[5. d4 is best]

5… d6 6. d4 Bb6 7. h3 Nf6 8.
dxe5?!

  Just because your opponent plays slowly doesn’t mean you
can relax.

[8. d5 may have been better]

8… Nxe5 9. Nxe5 Qxe5 10. Nd2

 

t+l+j+-T
XxX-+xXx
-L-X-S-+
+-+-D-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-P-+-+p
pP-N-Pp+
R-Bq+rK-

White has done everything possible to encourage Black!

10… Bxh3 11. gxh3 Qg3+ 12. Kh1 Qxh3+ 13. Kg1
Ng4 14. Nf3 Qg3+ 15. Kh1 Bxf2

-+


Another trap in the Closed
Variation of the Giuoco Piano

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Qe7 5. O-O?! d6 6. d4
Bb6 7. Bg5 f6?! 8. Bh4 g5?! 9. Nxg5 fxg5

  I said above that you usually can’t afford to do this in
front of your castled King. It’s also not safe in front of your
uncastled King!

10. Qh5+ Kd8 11. Bxg5

 

t+lJ-+sT
XxX-D-+x
-LsX-+-+
+-+-X-Bq
-+bPp+-+
+-P-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
Rn+-+rK-

Is White’s attack worth a piece?

11… Nf6 12. Qh6 Rf8 13. f4 exd4

  Else White fatally opens the f-file.

14. e5! dxc3+ 15. Kh1 cxb2

 

t+lJ-T-+
XxX-D-+x
-LsX-S-Q
+-+-P-B-
-+b+-P-+
+-+-+-+-
pX-+-+pP
Rn+-+r+k

16. exf6 Rxf6 17. Qxf6 bxa1=Q 18. Qxa1+-

 


Trap in the Main Line of the
Giuoco Piano with 6. O-O

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6.
O-O

  White sometimes plays this uncommon alternative to avoid
the main lines after 6. cxd4.

6…Nxe4?

[6…d6]

7. cxd4 Be7 8. d5 Nb8 9. Re1 Nd6 10. Bb3 O-O 11.
Nc3 Ne8 12. d6

 

tSlDsTj+
XxXxLxXx
-+-P-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+bN-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-BqR-K-

A very clever move.

12… cxd6

[12… Bxd6 13. Bg5 Nf6 14. Nd5 Nc6 15. Nxf6+ gxf6
16. Bh6+- ]

[12… Nxd6 13. Rxe7 Qxe7 14. Bg5 Qe8 15. Qd3 Nc6 16.
Re1+- ]

13. Rxe7 Qxe7 14. Bg5 Nf6 15. Nd5 Qd8 16. Qd4 Nc6
17. Qh4+-


Trap in the Main Line of the
Giuoco Piano with 6. O-O

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. O-O
O-O?

[again, 6…d6 is most reliable]

7. cxd4 Bb6 8. d5 Ne7 9. e5 Ne8 10. d6 cxd6 11.
exd6 Ng6 12. Bg5 Nf6 13. Nc3 h6 14. Qd3

 

t+lD-Tj+
Xx+x+xX-
-L-P-SsX
+-+-+-B-
-+b+-+-+
+-Nq+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-+-+rK-

A terrific example of the central pawn raid.

14… Kh7

[14… hxg5 15. Qxg6]

15. Bxf7! Rxf7 16. Ne5 hxg5 17. Qxg6+ Kg8 18.
Qxf7+ +-

 


Trap in the Main Line of the
Giuoco Piano with 6. O-O

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. O-O
dxc3

  A little greedy.

7. e5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-P-+-
-+b+-+-+
+-X-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

Black’s next is often the right idea, but doesn’t work here because
of the lag in development and castling.

7… d5 8. exf6 dxc4 9. Qxd8+ Nxd8 10. fxg7 Rg8
11. Nxc3 Rxg7 12. Bf4 Ne6 13. Rfe1 c6 14. Ne4 Be7 15.
Rad1+/-

 

t+l+j+-+
Xx+-LxTx
-+x+s+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+x+nB-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
+-+rR-K-

could you win from here as White? Black cannot afford to play

15… Nxf4

  because of

16. Nf6+ Kf8 17. Rd8+ Bxd8 18. Re8#

 

t+lLrJ-+
Xx+-+xTx
-+x+-N-+
+-+-+-+-
-+x+-S-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
+-+-+-K-


Trap in the Main Line of the
Giuoco Piano with 6. cxd4

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6.
cxd4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-+-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

This is the normal continuation.

6… Bb6?

  This isn’t! The Pawns push forward.

[6… Bb4+ is best]

7. d5 Ne7 8. e5 Ne4 9. d6 Nxf2 10. Qe2 Nxh1 11.
Bg5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXxSxXx
-L-P-+-+
+-+-P-B-
-+b+-+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+q+pP
Rn+-K-+s

11… Bf2+

  Black intends to get the Queen out via c7

12. Kd1!

[12. Kf1 Nf5 13. Bxd8

[or 13. Qe4 Nhg3+ 14. Kxf2 Nxe4+ 15. Ke1 Nxg5-+
]

13… Ne3+ 14. Qxe3 Bxe3-/+ and Black is in the
clear]

12… c5 13. Bxe7 Qb6 14. Ng5 Rf8 15. Qh5 g6 16.
Qxh7+-


Trap in the Moller
Attack

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O Bxc3 9. d5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+p+-+-
-+b+s+-+
+-L-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

The Moller Attack

9… Ne5?!

[9… Bf6!]

10. bxc3 Nxc4 11. Qd4 Ncd6?

[11… f5]

12. Qxg7 Qf6 13. Qxf6 Nxf6 14. Re1+

 

t+l+j+-T
XxXx+x+x
-+-S-S-+
+-+p+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-B-R-K-

14… Kf8

[14… Kd8 15. Bg5 Nde8 16. Rxe8+ Kxe8 17. Re1+! Kf8
18. Bh6+ Kg8 19. Re5 d6 20. Rg5#]

15. Bh6+ Kg8 16. Re5 Nfe4 17. Re1 f5 18.
Re7+-

 

t+l+-+jT
XxXxR-+x
-+-S-+-B
+-+p+x+-
-+-+s+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+-+-R-K-

“and wins”, says Znosko-Borovsky. Have a go!

18… a5 19. Nd4 b5 20. f3 Nxc3 21. Rg7+ Kf8 22.
Rxd7+ Kg8 23. Rg7+ Kf8 24. Rxc7+ Kg8 25. Rg7+ Kf8 26. Ra7+ Kg8 27.
Rxa8 +-


Bernstein’s Trap in the Moller
Attack

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4
Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O Nxc3 9. bxc3 Bxc3 10. Qb3

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+qL-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-B-+rK-

10… Bxa1?

  Black is being terribly greedy.

[10… d5 11. Bxd5 O-O 12. Bxf7+ Kh8 13. Qxc3 Rxf7
14. Ne5 Nxe5 15. dxe5 Be6<-/-> ]

11. Bxf7+ Kf8 12. Bg5 Ne7 13. Ne5 Bxd4 14. Bg6 d5
15. Qf3+ Bf5 16. Bxf5 Bxe5 17. Be6+ Bf6 18. Bxf6+-


Some Variations in the Italian
Game

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5

  We will look at the Giuoco Piano with 4.c3, and Evans’
Gambit with 4. b4.


A. Main line Guioco Piano 4.
c3

4… Nf6

  The alternatives 4…Bb6, and 4…d6 give White a free
hand. We’ll have a look at 4…Bb6, the Closed Variation
in section B later.

5. d4 exd4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-+-+-
-+bXp+-+
+-P-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

6. cxd4

  White has alternatives:

[6. e5 d5 is no good]

[You might try one day 6. b4 Bb6 7. e5 d5 8. exf6
dxc4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-Ls+-P-+
+-+-+-+-
-PxX-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

For example 9. b5 Na5 10. Qe2+ Be6 11. fxg7 Rg8 12. Nxd4 Bxd4
13. cxd4 Qxd4 14. Bb2 Qd3 15. Bf6 Qg6 16. Qf3 Rxg7 17. Nd2 Qxg2 18.
Qa3

 

t+-+j+-+
XxX-+xTx
-+-+lB-+
Sp+-+-+-
-+x+-+-+
Q-+-+-+-
p+-N-PdP
R-+-K-+r

which is wonderfully messy]

[Lastly, White has 6. O-O hoping for 6…dxc3 7. Nxc3
with a big lead in development. There are examples of this line in
the section on Traps, but it is neglected in many books on the
opening]

  After 6. cxd4 Black must reply

6… Bb4+

[6… Bb6 does nothing to slow White’s plan – see the
game by Boleslavsky in the ideas section if you are not
convinced!]

 

  Now White can play the risky 7. Nc3 or the safe
7. Bd2.


Risky main line 7.
Nc3

7. Nc3

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
-LbPp+-+
+-N-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-BqK-+r

7… Nxe4

[Instead 7… d5 can be tried, which is probably not
as good: e.g.

8. exd5 Nxd5 9. O-O Be6 10. Bg5 Be7 11. Bxd5 Bxd5 12.
Nxd5 Qxd5 13. Bxe7 Nxe7 14. Re1 f6 15. Qe2 Qd7

 

t+-+j+-T
XxXdS-Xx
-+-+-X-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-P-+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+qPpP
R-+-R-K-

Black’s King is caught in the centre, and cannot easily
leave.

Now White can try either:

16. Qe4 or

16. Rac1

For example: 16. Rac1 c6 17. d5 cxd5 18. Nd4 Kf7 19.
Ne6 Rhc8 20. Qg4 g6 21. Ng5+ Ke8 22. Rxe7+ Kf8 23. Rf7+ Kg8 24.
Rg7+ Kh8 25. Rxh7+ Kg8 26. Rg7+ Kh8 27. Qh4+ Kxg7 28. Qh7+ Kf8 29.
Qh8+ Ke7 30. Qg7+ Ke8 31. Qg8+ Ke7 32. Qf7+ Kd8 33. Qf8+ Qe8 34.
Nf7+ Kd7 35. Qd6#

 

t+t+d+-+
Xx+j+n+-
-+-Q-Xx+
+-+x+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
+-R-+-K-

An attractive ‘swallowtail mate’ in a game which Fritz produced
from memory]

  White continues in bold style with

8. O-O

  Black has a further choice:

8…Bxc3, the Moller attack

8…Nxc3, avoiding the Moller

  We’ll look at the avoiding line first, as it’s such a
good example of how quickly White can win in the Giuoco Piano.


Black avoids the
Moller

8…Nxc3

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-LbP-+-+
+-S-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

White has to play

9. bxc3

  when Black has another choice

Greedy 9…Bxc3

Safer 9…d5


Bernstein’s line: greedy
9…Bxc3

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+-L-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

Reply

10. Ba3

[10. Qb3 is also fun: see the Traps section]

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bP-+-+
B-L-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+q+rK-

This is Bernstein’s line, and Black no longer has a satisfactory
reply. When I came across this line as a junior I fell in love with
it, and always tried to play it.

  The most important one to deal with is the most
obvious:

10… Bxa1

11. Re1+ Ne7 12. Bxe7 Qxe7 13. Rxe7+ Kxe7 14.
Qe1+ Kf8 15. Qxa1

 

t+l+-J-T
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
Q-+-+-K-

with extra material, and White’s attack is far from over. Black
must back out earlier.

 

10… d6

  is also insufficient

11. Rc1 Ba5 12. Qa4 a6 13. Bd5 Bb6 14. Rxc6 Bd7
15. Re1+ Kf8 16. Rxd6 cxd6 17. Bxd6+ Kg8 18. Bxf7+ Kxf7 19. Qb3+
Kg6 20. Ne5+

 

t+-D-+-T
+x+l+-Xx
xL-B-+j+
+-+-N-+-
-+-P-+-+
+q+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
+-+-R-K-

20…Kf6 [20… Kh5 21. Qf3+ Kh6 22. Nf7+ Kg6
23. Nxd8 Bxd8 24. Qxb7]

21. Qf7+ Kg5 22. Qxg7+ Kh5 23. g4+ Bxg4 24. Qxg4+
Kh6 25. Nf7#

 

10… d5

  Often a good idea but here is no good either:

11. Bb5 Bxa1 12. Re1+ Be6 13. Qa4 Qc8 14. Bxc6+
bxc6 15. Qxc6+ Kd8 16. Ng5 Qb8

 

tD-J-+-T
X-X-+xXx
-+q+l+-+
+-+x+-N-
-+-P-+-+
B-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
L-+-R-K-

10… Qf6

  Not even close

11. Rc1 Bb4 12. Bxb4 Nxb4 13. Re1+

 

t+l+j+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+-+-D-+
+-+-+-+-
-SbP-+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+-RqR-K-

10… Ne7

  best: the game might go

11. Qb3 d5 12. Qxc3 dxc4 13. Rfe1 Be6 14. Bxe7
Kxe7 15. d5 Qxd5 16. Rad1 Qc5 17. Re5 Qb6

 

t+-+-+-T
XxX-JxXx
-D-+l+-+
+-+-R-+-
-+x+-+-+
+-Q-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
+-+r+-K-

White now can finish nicely:

18. Rxe6+ Qxe6

  else Qxg7+ is terrible

19. Re1 Qxe1+ 20. Qxe1+ Kd8 21. Ne5

 

t+-J-+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-N-+-
-+x+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
+-+-Q-K-

when White should be able to handle the Pawns, which lack support
from the Rooks.


Bernstein: the safer 9…
d5

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+x+-+-
-LbP-+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

This may be really where Black should back out.

10. cxb4 dxc4 11. Re1+

[A safer line for White here is 11. b5 Ne7 12. Ba3
O-O 13. Qe2 Re8 14. Qxc4]

11… Ne7

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-SxXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
-PxP-+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-BqR-K-

12. Qe2

[John Walker suggests the piece sacrifice with 12.
Bg5 f6

[not 12… Be6 13. Bxe7 Qxe7 14. d5]

13. Qe2 fxg5 14. Nxg5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-S-Xx
-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-N-
-PxP-+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+qPpP
R-+-R-K-

…which certainly puts Black under pressure, but it’s not my
style.]

  After 12. Qe2 Fritz wanted to play out a game it knew
about, which ran:

12… Be6 13. Bg5 Qd7 14. Qe5 c6 15. Qxg7 O-O-O
16. Ne5 Qd5 17. Qf6 Ng6 18. h4 Rhg8 19. Nxg6 hxg6 20. Rac1 b5 21.
a4 Qxd4 22. axb5 Qxf6 23. Bxf6 Rd3 24. bxc6 Kc7 25. Rxe6 fxe6 26.
Rxc4

 

-+-+-+t+
X-J-+-+-
-+p+xBx+
+-+-+-+-
-Pr+-+-P
+-+t+-+-
-+-+-Pp+
+-+-+-K-

White’s exchange deficit is compensated by the pawns

  If you don’t fancy this you can always play
11.b5.


Moller attack

8… Bxc3

  Now the key reply is 9. d5, although we will look at 9.
bxc3 below.

9. d5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+p+-+-
-+b+s+-+
+-L-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

9… Bf6

  Neither

[9… Na5 ?]

  nor

[9… Nd6 ?]

  are any good.

[9… Ne5 is better, but after 10. bxc3 Nxc4 11. Qd4
f5 Keene and Levy give 12. Qxc4 d6 13. Nd4 O-O 14. f3 Nc5
with
advantage
(Alert and anxious reader: “What about 11…Ncd6? What about
11…O-O?” What indeed?)
]

[And after 9… Ne7 White continues logically 10.
bxc3 O-O 11. Re1 Nf6 12. Bg5 Ng6 13. d6 h6 14. Qd3 hxg5 15. Qxg6
cxd6 16. Nxg5 Qc7 17. Bxf7+ Kh8 18. Re3

 

t+l+-T-J
XxDx+bX-
-+-X-Sq+
+-+-+-N-
-+-+-+-+
+-P-R-+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+-+-K-

winning]

  After 9…Bf6, the only try is

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-L-+
+-+p+-+-
-+b+s+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

10. Re1

[If 10. dxc6 bxc6 11. Re1 Black can continue 11…O-O
12. Rxe4 d5 13. Rf4 dxc4 14. Qa4 c3 15. bxc3 Bxc3 16. Rb1 Qd3 17.
Rbb4 Ba6 18. Rbc4 Bxc4 19. Rxc4 Rab8 -+]

10… Ne7 11. Rxe4 d6 12. Bg5 Bxg5 13.
Nxg5

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-SxXx
-+-X-+-+
+-+p+-N-
-+b+r+-+
+-+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
R-+q+-K-

13… O-O

[BCO reckons a better line is 13… h6 14. Qh5 O-O
15. Rae1 Nf5 16. Nxf7

[16. Ne6 fxe6 17. dxe6 Ne7 -+ BCO2]

16… Qf6[[opthyphen]] Zak]

14. Nxh7 Kxh7

[or 14… Bf5 15. Rh4=]

15. Qh5+ Kg8 16. Rh4 f5 17. Re1 Re8

[We saw …Ng6 in the Traps section above]

18. Re6 Kf8 19. Be2 Nxd5 20. Qxf5+ Kg8 21. Qh7+
Kf7 22. Rxe8 Kxe8 23. Qg8+ Kd7 24. Bg4+ Kc6 25. Qxd8
winning

 

t+lQ-+-+
XxX-+-X-
-+jX-+-+
+-+s+-+-
-+-+-+bR
+-+-+-+-
pP-+-PpP
+-+-+-K-

If this is all a bit much, White can go instead

9. bxc3

when 9… d5

  is OK for Black.

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+x+-+-
-+bPs+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

White is still ahead in development but Black still has a pawn. At
Grandmaster level they have given up on this line, thinking White
cannot get enough of an attack going. At club level, though, there
may be enough meat left to chew.

  Let’s look at two example lines, to see how games might
go.

10. Bb5 O-O 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Bd3 Bg6 13. Rb1 Nd6 14.
Ba3 b6 15. Ne5 Bxd3 16. Qxd3 Ne7 17. Rfe1 f6 18. Ng4 Qd7 19. Qh3
Rad8 20. Rb2 Ng6 21. Qf3 Rfe8 22. Rbe2 Rxe2 23. Rxe2 Ne4 24. h3 Qa4
25. Bb2 Qxa2 26. Ne3

 

-+-T-+j+
X-X-+-Xx
-X-+-Xs+
+-+x+-+-
-+-Ps+-+
+-P-Nq+p
dB-+rPp+
+-+-+-K-

when it has all gone minty for White.

  So White can try instead

10. Be3 dxc4 11. Re1 f5 12. Nd2 Kf7 13. Nxe4 fxe4 14.
Rxe4 Qf6 15. Qe2 Bf5 16. Qxc4+ Kg6 17. Re3 Rae8 18. Rae1 Rxe3 19.
Rxe3 h5 20. h3 h4 21. d5 Ne5 22. Qxc7 Nd3 23. Qxb7 Bc8 24. Qc6 Qxc6
25. dxc6 Nf4 26. Re7 a6

 

-+l+-+-T
+-+-R-X-
x+p+-+j+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-S-X
B-P-+-+p
p+-+-Pp+
+-+-+-K-

when White has enough pawns to account for the piece, but their
scattered placing makes it hard to play for a win.

  If you are not convinced by any of these lines (and while
they are worth a punt in practice the theory is against them) you
can always play safe on move 7. So let’s look at that next.


Safe main line 7. Bd2

7. Bd2

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-+-+-+-
-LbPp+-+
+-+-+n+-
pP-B-PpP
Rn+qK-+r

7… Bxd2+ 8. Nbxd2 d5

  Of course.

9. exd5 Nxd5

[A solid line is 10. O-O O-O 11. Nb3]

10. Qb3 Nce7 11. O-O O-O

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxX-SxXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+s+-+-
-+bP-+-+
+q+-+n+-
pP-N-PpP
R-+-+rK-

White has several alternatives in this well-known position:

[12. Ne5]

[12. Ne4]

[12. Bxd5]

[12. Rae1]

[12. Rfe1]

 

  For an example of 12. Rfe1 see the games section.


The closed variation
4…Bb6

4… Bb6 5. d4 Qe7

[6. O-O+= is good enough, but try
instead…]

6. Bg5

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-Ls+-+-+
+-+-X-B-
-+bPp+-+
+-P-+n+-
pP-+-PpP
Rn+qK-+r

This continuation was discovered by Jonathan Mestel and helped him
win the UK Championship in 1975. Of course, Black doesn’t want to
weaken the King’s-side with …f6, when Nxe5 looks very dangerous.

6… Nf6 7. d5 Nd8 8. d6 cxd6

  The capture with 8…Qxd6 9. Qxd6 cxd6 is no safer for
Black.

9. Na3 a6 10. Nc2 Bxf2+ 11. Ke2 Bc5 12. Nh4 Ne6
13. Nf5 +-

 

t+l+j+-T
+x+xDxXx
x+-XsS-+
+-L-XnB-
-+b+p+-+
+-P-+-+-
pPn+k+pP
R-+q+-+r

Mestel-Doyle ’75; White has a large positional advantage and may be
winning.


Evans’ Gambit 4. b4

4. b4

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-L-X-+-
-Pb+p+-+
+-+-+n+-
p+pP-PpP
RnBqK-+r



Evans’ Gambit Declined (4…Bb6)

4… Bb6

  The best way to refute a gambit is to accept it.

5. a4 a6 6. Nc3 d6

[6… Nf6 7. Nd5 Nxd5 8. exd5 e4 9. dxc6 exf3 10.
Qxf3 Qe7+ 11. Kd1 dxc6 12. Re1 Be6 13. Bb2 +=/+- estrin]

7. Nd5 Ba7 8. d3 h6

[8… Nce7 Fritz]

9. Be3 +=

 

t+lDj+sT
LxX-+xX-
x+sX-+-X
+-+nX-+-
pPb+p+-+
+-+pBn+-
-+p+-PpP
R-+qK-+r

With an edge for White – Panov/Estrin]


Evans’ Gambit Accepted
(4…Bxb4)

4… Bxb4

[If instead 4… Nxb4 5. c3 Nc6 6. d4

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-L-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBqK-+r

transposes to the 5…Bc5 variation]

 

5. c3

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-Lb+p+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-P-PpP
RnBqK-+r

Black has three choices:

5… Ba5

5… Bc5

5… Be7


Evans’ Gambit with 5…
Bc5

5… Bc5 6. d4 exd4 7. O-O

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
+-L-+-+-
-+bXp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

7…d6

[7… d3 8. Ng5 Nh6 9. Nxf7 +- BCO2 9… Nxf7 10.
Qh5]

8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Nc3 Na5 10. Bg5 Ne7

[10… f6 11. Bf4 Nxc4 12. Qa4+ Qd7 13. Qxc4 Qf7 14.
Nd5

 

t+l+j+sT
XxX-+dXx
-L-X-X-+
+-+n+-+-
-+qPpB-+
+-+-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+-+rK-

14… g5 15. Bg3 Be6 16. Qa4+ Bd7 17. Qa3 Rc8 18. Rfe1 g4 19.
Nxb6 axb6 20. Nd2 Be6 21. f4 gxf3 22. Nxf3 Ne7 23. e5 fxe5 24. dxe5
d5 25. Rf1 Nf5 26. Nd4

 

-+t+j+-T
+xX-+d+x
-X-+l+-+
+-+xPs+-
-+-N-+-+
Q-+-+-B-
p+-+-+pP
R-+-+rK-

when it’s still awkward for Black

  Now an old analysis goes:

11. Bxf7+ Kxf7 12. Nd5 Re8 13. Bxe7 Rxe7 14. Ng5+
Kg8 15. Qh5 h6 16. Qg6 hxg5 17. Nf6+ Kf8 18. Nh7+ Kg8 19.
Nf6+

 

t+lD-+j+
XxX-T-X-
-L-X-Nq+
S-+-+-X-
-+-Pp+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
R-+-+rK-

with a draw by perpetual check – Tchigorin


Evans’ Gambit with
5..Be7

5… Be7

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXxLxXx
-+s+-+-+
+-+-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-P-PpP
RnBqK-+r

6. d4

[6. Qb3 Nh6 7. d4 Na5 8. Qb5 Nxc4 9. Bxh6 gxh6 10.
Qxc4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXxLx+x
-+-+-+-X
+-+-X-+-
-+qPp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+-K-+r

unclear: Harding-Hodgson corr. 1975]

6… Na5 7. Nxe5 Nxc4 8. Nxc4 d5 9. exd5 Qxd5 10.
Ne3 Qd7 11. O-O Nf6 12. c4 O-O

[12… b5 = Nunn]

13. Nc3 c6 14. d5 cxd5 15. Ncxd5 Nxd5 16.
Nxd5

 

t+l+-Tj+
Xx+dLxXx
-+-+-+-+
+-+n+-+-
-+p+-+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
R-Bq+rK-

+= Nunn-Larsen 1980

  White has a small edge.

  The most famous recent example of this line is of
course:



Kasparov, Gary-Anand,
Viswanathan, Riga 1993

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Be7 6. d4
Na5 7. Be2

 

t+lDj+sT
XxXxLxXx
-+-+-+-+
S-+-X-+-
-+-Pp+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-+bPpP
RnBqK-+r

A new move

7… exd4 8. Qxd4 Nf6 9. e5 Nc6 10. Qh4 Nd5 11.
Qg3 g6 12. O-O Nb6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxXxLx+x
-Ss+-+x+
+-+-P-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-P-+nQ-
p+-+bPpP
RnB-+rK-

The Black king never escapes the centre

13. c4 d6 14. Rd1 Nd7 15. Bh6 Ncxe5 16. Nxe5 Nxe5
17. Nc3

  Develop before attacking with a move like Bg7

17… f6 18. c5 Nf7 19. cxd6 cxd6 20. Qe3 Nxh6
21. Qxh6 Bf8

 

t+lDjL-T
Xx+-+-+x
-+-X-XxQ
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+-+
+-N-+-+-
p+-+bPpP
R-+r+-K-

White’s lead on development could hardly be greater

22. Qe3+ Kf7 23.

Nd5 Be6 24. Nf4 Qe7 25. Re1 1-0

 

t+-+-L-T
Xx+-Dj+x
-+-XlXx+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-N-+
+-+-Q-+-
p+-+bPpP
R-+-R-K-

[25… Qd7 26. Bb5 Qxb5 27. Qxe6+ Kg7 28. Nd5 Qb2 29.
Rab1]

[25… Re8 26. Nxe6 Qxe6 27. Qxe6+ Rxe6 28.
Bc4]

[25… Bh6 26. Bc4]

  An amazing destruction of the current world No.3 and his
PCA championship challenger.


Evans’ Gambit with 5…
Ba5

t+lDj+sT
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-P-+n+-
p+-P-PpP
RnBqK-+r

This is the best line.

6. d4 d6

  Lasker’s Defence, which led to some disillusionment with
the Gambit.

7. Qb3

 

t+lDj+sT
XxX-+xXx
-+sX-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

Black has three tries here, but only the last is trustworthy:

A. 7… Qe7

B. 7… Nxd4

C. 7… Qd7


Lasker’s Defence with 7…
Qe7

7… Qe7

 

t+l+j+sT
XxX-DxXx
-+sX-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

The trouble with this move is that the Nc6 has no good retreat, and
must advance. This leads to trouble. The game might go:

8. d5 Nd4 9. Nxd4 exd4 10. Qa4+ Kd8 11. Qxa5
Qxe4+ 12. Kd2 Qxg2 13. Re1 Nf6 14. Bd3 Qxf2+ 15. Re2
Qg1

16. Na3 Bg4 17. Bb2 dxc3+ 18. Bxc3 Qb6 19. Bxf6+
gxf6 20. Qc3 Kd7 21. Bb5+ c6 22. dxc6+ bxc6 23. Bxc6+ Kd8 24. Qxf6+
Kc7 25. Re7+ Kxc6 26. Rc1+

 

t+-+-+-T
X-+-Rx+x
-DjX-Q-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+-+l+
N-+-+-+-
p+-K-+-P
+-R-+-+-

26… Qc5 27. Rxc5+ Kxc5 28. Qc3+ Kb6 29. Qb4+ Kc6 30.
Qb5#


Lasker’s Defence with 7…
Nxd4

7… Nxd4

 

t+lDj+sT
XxX-+xXx
-+-X-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bSp+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

8. Nxd4 exd4 9. Bxf7+ Kf8 10. O-O dxc3 11. e5 Qe7

 

t+l+-JsT
XxX-DbXx
-+-X-+-+
L-+-P-+-
-+-+-+-+
+qX-+-+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-+rK-

If White consolidates, Black’s lost King will die.

12. Bxg8 Rxg8 13. exd6 Qe5 14. Na3 Be6 15. Qxb7
Bd5 16. Qb5 Bb6 17. Nc4 Qe4 18. Ne3

 

t+-+-Jt+
X-X-+-Xx
-L-P-+-+
+q+l+-+-
-+-+d+-+
+-X-N-+-
p+-+-PpP
R-B-+rK-

This move holds the game for White.

18… Bc6

[18… Bxe3 19. fxe3+ Bf7 20. dxc7]

19. Qb3 cxd6 20. Ba3 g6 21. Rad1 Kg7 22. Qxc3+
Kh6 23. Bc1 Kh5

 

t+-+-+t+
X-+-+-+x
-LlX-+x+
+-+-+-+j
-+-+d+-+
+-Q-N-+-
p+-+-PpP
+-Br+rK-

24. Nd5



Lasker’s Defence with 7… Qd7

This is the only satisfactory line.

7… Qd7

covers f7

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXd+xXx
-+sX-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+bPp+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

Now as far as I can find out the best try for White here is:

8. dxe5!

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXd+xXx
-+sX-+-+
L-+-P-+-
-+b+p+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

Now Black has:

CI: 8…dxe5

CII: 8…Bb6

 

Variation CI: 8… dxe5

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXd+xXx
-+s+-+-+
L-+-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

9. O-O Bb6 10. Rd1 Qe7 11. a4 a6

[11… a5 is less safe:

12. Bd5 Bg4 13. Rd3 Be6 14. Ba3

 

t+-+j+sT
+xX-DxXx
-Ls+l+-+
X-+bX-+-
p+-+p+-+
BqPr+n+-
-+-+-PpP
Rn+-+-K-

+- Shaposhnikov-Veltmander 1958]

 

12. Ba3 Qf6

 

t+l+j+sT
+xX-+xXx
xLs+-D-+
+-+-X-+-
p+b+p+-+
BqP-+n+-
-+-+-PpP
Rn+r+-K-

13. a5 Bxa5 14. Bd5 Bb6 15. Nbd2 Nge7 16. Nc4 Ba7 17. Rd2
8/=

  With enough compensation for the material, according to
Estrin.

 

Variation CII: 8… Bb6

 

t+l+j+sT
XxXd+xXx
-LsX-+-+
+-+-P-+-
-+b+p+-+
+qP-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
RnB-K-+r

This may be the best line for Black.

9. Bb5 a6 10. Ba4 Qe6 11. Bxc6+ bxc6 12. O-O Rb8
13. Qxe6+ fxe6 14. exd6 cxd6 15. Ba3

 

-Tl+j+sT
+-+-+-Xx
xLxXx+-+
+-+-+-+-
-+-+p+-+
B-P-+n+-
p+-+-PpP
Rn+-+rK-

+=

  In this endgame, White has a slight advantage, according
to Estrin.


Appendix 1. Why is it called
“Italian”?

The play most characteristic of the late 1700s and later was
dominated by the style of the Italian MODENESE SCHOOL – Italian
players and writers like DEL RIO, LOLLI and PONZIANI, through whom
the Italian Game (Guioco Piano and related
openings) came into prominence. Fast development followed by
attack was the name of the game, and beyond this it is
difficult to see much theory at all; players were concerned with
direct attack – to mate, or lose gloriously in the attempt. From
this period we inherit all the older tactical variations of the
King’s Gambit and Guioco Piano, where sacrifices
were common and their acceptance almost routine. This period should
not be though of as artless – it produced legions of fine analysts
and several games of genius, and much was learned about the art of
attack.

  Sadly, when players learned to decline or return
sacrificed material, a lot of the steam went out of these openings.
e.g. an old line of the Danish Gambit goes 1 e4,
e5; 2 d4, exd4; 3 c3, exc3; 4 Bc4, cxb2; 5 Bxb2
. If Black
clings to the material White will have a good time, but MIESES
showed 5…d5; 6 Bxd5, Nf6 secures open lines and
probably the two Bishops. The best line for White here is probably
7 Bxf7+ Kxf7; 8 Qxd8, Bb4+ 9 Qd2, Bxd2+ when Black has no
extra material but can play to win the ending with the
Queen’s-side majority. Technique was replacing romance in
chess.

  The play of the American Paul MORPHY brought some
additional science to all this, not that everyone recognised it at
the time. Through his games he showed that a successful attack must
be based on a lead in development. Similarly, he showed
that a player who is behind in development must not open lines to
‘free their position’, since these lines will provide avenues along
which the better-developed side will attack – instead, they should
keep things closed until they have caught up a bit. Morphy’s play
was the Italian game perfected, and I have used many of his games
in this booklet.


Appendix 2. Oh, if you must…
some ideas for playing the Giuoco Pianissimo

If you must play the Guioco Pianissimo, here are
some quick hot tips for this line.

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+sX-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-Np+n+-
pPp+-PpP
R-BqK-+r

Don’t be in a hurry to castle: your opponent may play
…Bg4 (or Bg5) and pin your knight against the Queen. If you have
castled you probably won’t be able to play h3 (or …h6) without
dangerously weakening your king. Steinitz discovered that the
sacrificial idea 6. O-O, Bg4; 7. h3, h5! 8.hxg4, hxg4 was
playable for Black in many positions (see below) because of the
attack on the King down the open h-file: once the Queen gets to h5
White is finished. Even playing 1.e4, e5; 2. Nf3, Nc6; 3. Bc4,
Bc5; 4. Nc3, Nc6; 5. d3, d6; 6.h3
is not advisable as Black
may play the standard sacrifice …Bxh3 at some point, or lever
open your king’s side with …g7-g5-g4.

  The key question in this line is: how are you going
to develop your queen’s bishop
? White on move six can go
6. Be3 hoping for 6…Bxe3; 7. fxe3 when there is
a juicy half-open f-file to attack along. Black is better off
calmly retreating with 6…Bb6 or even leaving the Bishop
at c5.

  The analysts gradually agreed that 6.Bg5, the
Canal Variation, is the best
move
. One line of this goes 6…h6; (this is OK for
Black before castling) when the main line goes 7.Bxf6, Qxf6;
8.Nd5, Qd8
. White has given up the Bishop pair to achieve a
bit of initiative. [There is a hairy line with 6.Bg5,
h6; 7.Bxf6, Qxf6; 8.Nd5, Qg6!? 9.Nxc7
+ which is supposed
to be poor for Black if White plays 9.Rg1 instead,
but White has to prove it!
] Other ways to play for Black are
to hit the other bishop with 6…Na5 (as in the final
game) or to play himself 6…Be6.

  in the Canal Variation: to emphasise the pin on the
Nf6,
if you’re allowed, with moves like Nd5, and otherwise
threaten to give Black doubled, and therefore weak, f-pawns. I
played a miniature with this theme at the British Universities’
Congress some years ago:


Regis (Exeter) – Orpwood
(Salford), 1987.

1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d3 Bb4 5. Nge2 O-O 6. O-O
d6 7. Bg5 Na5 8. Bxf6! gxf6 9. Nd5 Bc5 10. b4 Nxc4 11. dxc4 c6 12.
bxc5 cxd5 13. cxd5 dxc5 DIAGRAM

 

t+lD-Tj+
Xx+-+x+x
-+-+-X-+
+-XpX-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-+-+-+-
p+p+nPp+
R-+q+rK-

14. Ng3 Kh8 15. Qh5 Qd7? 16. Qh6 Qd6 17. Nh5 Rg8 18. Nxf6
Rg7 19. Qxg7+ 1-0

  (Ne8+ will leave White a rook ahead)

  again in the Canal Variation: move the Nc3 to e.g. d5 and
play for c3 and d4 with a central space advantage. The
knight on c3 can relocate to e3…

try to open up the f-file with f4: this will
require you to play Be3 to stop a check from the Bc5 and to move
the other Knight e.g. Nh4. From h4 the Knight can threaten to go to
f5 when Black may be reluctant to remove it by …g6 which will
create weaknesses. A Queen’s Knight that has travelled from
c3-d5-e3 also puts pressure on this square, and if Black does play
g6 then Ne3-g4 hits all the soft spots.

  And here are some traps:


A trap in the Giuoco
Pianissimo

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. d3 d6 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. Bg5
h6 7. Bxf6 Qxf6 8. Nd5 Qd8 9. c3

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xX-
-+sX-+-X
+-LnX-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-Pp+n+-
pP-+-PpP
R-+qK-+r

9… Be6 ?

[better is 9… Ne7]

10. d4 +/- 10… exd4 11. cxd4 Bb4+ 12. Nxb4 Bxc4
13. Nxc6 bxc6 14. Qc2


Another trap in the Giuoco
Pianissimo

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. d3 Nf6 5. Nc3
O-O?!

  too early

[better is 5… d6]

 

t+lD-Tj+
XxXx+xXx
-+s+-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-Np+n+-
pPp+-PpP
R-BqK-+r

6. Bg5 h6 7. Bh4 Bb4 8. O-O Bxc3 9. bxc3 g5

  Normally you cannot afford to do this in front of your
castled King.

10. Nxg5 hxg5 11. Bxg5 Kg7 12. f4+-

  with a strong attack


One more trap in the Giuoco
Pianissimo

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. O-O?!

[better is 4. c3]

4… Nf6 5. d3 d6 6. Bg5?

[better is 6. Be3]

6… h6 7. Bh4 g5 8. Bg3 h5! 9. Nxg5
h4

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+x+-
-+sX-S-+
+-L-X-N-
-+b+p+-X
+-+p+-B-
pPp+-PpP
Rn+q+rK-

10. Nxf7 Bg4 11. Qd2 Nd4 12. Nc3

[12. Nxd8 hxg3 13. fxg3

[13. hxg3 Nf3+ 14. gxf3 Bxf3-+ ]

13… Nf3+ 14. Kh1 Rxh2#]

12… Nf3+ 13. gxf3 Bxf3-+

 

t+-Dj+-T
XxX-+n+-
-+-X-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-X
+-Np+lB-
pPpQ-P-P
R-+-+rK-

…and Black wins.

  Even armed with all these ideas it’s really not that good
a line to play. I include one last game which is intended to put
you off it for life!


Example Game in the Giuoco
Pianissimo: Chambers-Vorhees (Dayton, Ohio) 1972

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. d3 d6 5. O-O

  Too early: invites …Bg4.

5…Nf6

 

t+lDj+-T
XxX-+xXx
-+sX-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+b+p+-+
+-+p+n+-
pPp+-PpP
RnBq+rK-

This is a prime example of how not to play for this position for
White.

6. Ng5

  Premature.

6…O-O 7. Bxf7+ Rxf7 8. Nxf7 Kxf7

  White has snatched what he can.

9. h3

 

t+lD-+-+
XxX-+jXx
-+sX-S-+
+-L-X-+-
-+-+p+-+
+-+p+-+p
pPp+-Pp+
RnBq+rK-

Well, this does stop …Bg4, but invites a worse fate.

9… Be6 10. Nc3 Qd7 11. Qf3

  Not good enough, I’m afraid.

11…Nd4 12. Qd1

 

t+-+-+-+
XxXd+jXx
-+-XlS-+
+-L-X-+-
-+-Sp+-+
+-Np+-+p
pPp+-Pp+
R-Bq+rK-

12… Bxh3 13. gxh3 Qxh3 14. Be3 Nf3+ 0-1

Outside passed pawns

  1. In the middlegame, central pawns are generally worth more than wing pawns
  2. In an endgame, wing pawns are generally worth more than central pawns — especially if passed.