CHRISTMAS BOOK REVIEW: last minute gifts for the unimproved player

Some tips when choosing a Christmas gift for the chess player in your life.

The Ideas Behind Modern Chess Publishing (Gravy Train)

We must first note the misleading title: this is in fact a study of a typical club-players’  bad habits in the opening, which mostly encourages them. Once you have got past the cover, you will find a very brisk and practical approach has been taken here. The reader is shown just the positive points of various opening systems, without confusing them with any tiresome negative features. Black’s best defences, of course, are also carefully given no space at all, thus avoiding unnecessary complications, and even some of the basic replies that you might expect club players to know (or even stumble upon by accident) are omitted. Makes it all look incredibly easy, and created a very strong impression on this reviewer.

P.O.O.R. Chess (Moswhini).

P.O.O.R. Chess of course stands for Pennies Obtained for Old Rope, and this is very much the home ground of our Grandmaster-ringmaster-entertainer-instructor. And R.O.P.E., we discover, stands for Religion, Opinion, Platitudes and Exclamations!! Many readers will find the cutesy tone off-putting, but stick with it, and you may discover some of God’s most wonderful gifts to us, like the ability to skim a book like this through the air like a frisbee (S.A.B.L.T.T.T.A.L.A.F.), to land in the compost heap of a neighbour, maybe two streets away. Perhaps even that is not far enough.

Bluff like a Grandmaster (Putya Koton, trans. Koldout).

This was the book that blew the lid off the secret Soviet training methods, and showed them to be a tissue of lies. A classic, which continues to catch people out.

School of Chess Effluence (Vols.1-19) – (Forgetitsky and Yushudev).

Igor Forgetitsky has for many years been the go-to guy for top-level, in-depth, high-falutin and over-analytical chess training. His famous card indexes of training positions had become over-full during his years in Eastern Europe, and in the West he found a heaven-sent opportunity to capitalise on this rich resource. Indeed, there can hardly be a scrap of material remaining that has not found its way into a book in this extensive series.

The exercises themselves are amazingly detailed and difficult, so much so that you may sometimes forget whatever the point of the chapter was supposed to be, or indeed what is the point of chess study in the first place, or, in some instances, whether life itself has any purpose at all.

A major event in chess publishing. We can all look forward to more of this sort of thing.

The Idiot’s Mind (Sillyman).

This book gives the reader the rare chance to eavesdrop on a celebrated minor master shouting at his dimwitted students. I’m sure we can all identify with their slow, stumbling progress, and their inability to understand the most OBVIOUS things about a position, even when it is explained OVER and OVER again, in PAINFUL detail, you moron! EVERYTHING you think about at the board must be the most basic, the most concrete, and the most rational. What are you, born under an airhead sign or something? No, don’t tell me… Capricorn, you’re a Capricorn, right? Or a Taurus? I’m sure I can smell Taurus somewhere… Perhaps you’re a Cancer? Wait, come back…

Chess for Blokes: A 12-part DVD training guide (Devious, published by ChimpBase).

Some good, plain-speaking, gritty, practical advice from someone who got out of chess years ago to earn some proper money. He’s now realised the potential that exists in the chess DVD market, and is back to show us how it’s done.

You won’t find other Grandmasters giving most of these openings a second thought, so we are truly fortunate to watch Nigel Devious bluster his way past all the theoretical obstacles they they seem to think are so important in their fancy-dan tournaments. And it’s astonishing how even-handed this comprehensive series this is: the Colle is described as a good practical weapon in one DVD and yet is easy to deal with in another; it’s vital to play proper openings one day, but then you should play some corny old club nonsense on the next. And of course, our Northern host has a well-balanced chip on each shoulder. Perhaps only those able to afford the full selection will realise the true value of what’s on offer here.

It’s mostly about openings, of course, because that’s where the quick returns can be made, but Devious also offers DVDs on the practical side of chess playing. So, in other titles, he covers how to play juniors, elders, betters, how to get your own back in a post mortem and how to get the advantage without actually cheating. His study of the ancient Eastern philosophies on the Internet has led him to some surprising conclusions, like, there’s some Indian guy who apparently can survive without food or water for months on end. It’s true, I saw it myself, he’s being tested by scientists and everything. Wait, come back…

Starting out in Publishing Opening Guides (Everyminute Publishing, Onebourne).

The publisher here has re-thought the way chess opening books have been published, and come up with their own revolutionary scheme. For literally hundreds of years, the small square chess diagram has forced a two-column layout upon chess books, minimising the distance between a diagrams and its accompanying text, and minimising the amount of white space in a book. All that has been swept away with refreshing vigour in this groundbreaking series, so you will find much less in these books than you might have feared at first. Also, the exercise in flipping between pages to find the right diagram will keep you very much on your toes.

Although common wisdom suggests that most club players can stumble through no more than a half-dozen moves before forgetting what they have been told, the authors have all been instructed to give whole games here. So, as well as being given a whizz through some of the simpler ideas in an opening, you can look forward to playing over many many more moves in the example games, way past the point where you lose any hope of understanding what the Grandmaster opponents were thinking or indeed past any real interest in the outcome of the game. Thankfully, these long sequences are given mostly without notes, so you have all the excuse you need to omit them.

It will be a poor player who fails to get anything out of these books. And, as the publishers have no doubt realised, there are millions more such players than those who can see through this whole charade.

FOR JUNIORS: The Ten Ways to Succeed in Publishing series (Otiose and Rigid)

The authors have done a remarkable thing here, reducing what the young player needs to know to the absolute bare minimum necessary to survive, then throwing half of that away. Large text and ample spacing means that these books aren’t as small or as cheap as you might expect, and additional space is taken up with some child-friendly cartoons, drawn it seems by a friendly child.

JUST PUBLISHED: Lexicographer’s Lists (Neissman).

Subtitled: the Big Five, the Medium Fifteen, the Tiny Twenty, the Swift Half, and 4978 other Crucial Things you have to Keep In Mind at all Times. These are the few thousand most basic and important of chess tips, culled from decades of work with students, regurgitated onto the Internet, and now re-organised into the most complicated schemes imaginable.

This book should occupy a vital place in anyone’s chess coaching collection: for me, it’s jammed underneath my tottering bookcase, stopping the whole thing falling forwards.

 

Inspiration: Kingpin.

Skill or knowledge?

Chess is as much a ‘know-how’ skill as a ‘know-that’ body of knowledge.
RB Ramesh said something in an interview that I thought was very wise (and I paraphrase):

“If I want to learn swimming and don’t know how to swim, I buy some DVDs from a famous swimming coach or swimming world champion, who has done a 10-hour course. So I watch this course every day for one month, so I know all the theory, right, and what needs to be done, but if you push me into a swimming pool I will drown!”

“To take is a mistake”

My young friend and former student Theo Slade quoted this to me a while ago.

“To take is a mistake”

In some circumstances, it’s easy to see why:

A capture by either side gives up the d-file and invites Rd7/Rd2, so both sides need to find something else to do.

There is a YouTube lecture by Smirnov on this subject, which has been made into a Lichess study, which makes the point thoroughly: https://lichess.org/study/MJ9ZFfKI

Another quote, from a current student:

“I’m a bit nervous about tension.”

OK, I get that. If you respond to a threat by defending the attacked piece, the threat remains in the air, and if you overlook it later, it can bite you. This is Smirnov’s first example:

So 1.Nxg4 Bxg4=, but 1.Nf3+/-

But of course, if control of h2 remains disputed, the N cannot move away from f3. But 1.Nf3! is still the best move and should be played!

A slight digression: The Ruy Lopez

“why is the Ruy Lopez … so difficult for Black to combat? (Nunn and Griffiths)

Good question. Let’s have a look:

Michael Stean comments here:

“The first and most primitive idea behind 3. Bb5 is to lay siege to Black’s e-Pawn, which will subsequently be liquidated by d4, thereby opening the floodgates for the White Pawn centre to scatter the enemy forces with the allied pieces following up to rout the broken army — no prisoners taken. Black cannot however be forced to surrender the centre. By keeping his own e-Pawn firmly defended Black can thwart all White’s aspirations of conquest in the centre, but this will lead to a rather cramped position. So the offspring of White’s plan is an advantage in space due to the necessity for his opponent to maintain a firm central barricade. This spatial plus however is not very big and the only way to maintain it is by avoiding any exchange of pieces. Black’s position (Diagram 73) has sufficient ‘capacity’ for three minor pieces, but not clearly enough for all four of them. This explains why White is willing to invest so much time early in the game (Bb5, Ba4, Bb3, Bc2, h3) purely to avoid exchanges. If his spatial strategy is to succeed he must leave Black with four minor pieces. These closed Ruy Lopez positions are some of the most subtle and complex in the whole opening repertoire. It is probably no coincidence that nearly all the great players of recent times have been deadly exponents of the Ruy Lopez. In the hands of Fischer or Karpov 3. Bb5 sometimes appears to win by force. For example, Karpov-Westerinen, Nice 1974. 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 …

The clarity and popularity of Stean’s book has led to this being a leading interpretation of White’s chances in the Closed Morphy Defence. But there is more to it than that. Let us continue with the whole of that quote from Nunn and Griffiths:

“But already this opening has certain puzzling aspects. Why should White consistently maintain his initiative, both in the variations we have looked at and in those to come? Why should Black’s position be so awkward? The question really boils down to a more basic one: why is the Ruy Lopez (which this opening has virtually become) so difficult for Black to combat? Look at the present position: Black’s pieces are sensibly developed; he has as much space as White; his pawns are strong. Yet he has problems.
“The answer seems to be that in this type of Ruy Lopez position Black can easily get caught in a situation where his game cannot unfold. Here for instance, White has his plans of Ng3-f5 and later d4, but it is less easy for Black to find something profitable to do without weakening himself or making some serious concession. His pieces may look reasonably placed, but they cannot readily achieve anything constructive or relevant. I should make it clear that this does not have to happen in a Lopez; it is far from being a bad opening for him. But in practice one error (6…Qe7) can leave him in misery. And so, if a player seems to have a respectable game (in a Ruy Lopez or any other opening for that matter), yet still loses, his misfortune may often be traced back to this lack of life in his position.”
— NUNN AND GRIFFITHS

Trying to go beyond the Good Doctor’s commentary is surely lese-majeste, but let me have a go anyway. Euwe and Kramer call this type of structure the Tension Form, and there we have another secret of the position. There is unresolved tension. The central pawns, White and Black, can take each other, be captured, recapture in different ways, or White can shut down the tension by d4-d5. Now, exactly where you want your pieces may be a different, depending on the central structure. If White takes on e5, the outpost on d5 may become tempting for a Knight (Stean is very good on this too), and so Black might want to keep a wary eye on that possibility, and be able to respond in the best way. If White plays d4-d5, that possibility vanishes, but other ideas appear. Operating under this tension and flexibility and uncertainty is difficult for Black, who has that constraint on their manoeuvres presented by the d6 pawn.

So the next question arises: why on earth would Black want to subject themselves to this sort of unpleasantness? Perhaps it is for lack of alternatives, but there is something else… Operating under this tension and flexibility and uncertainty is difficult for White too! Perhaps a little less so than for Black, but the positions are actually tricky for both sides, and not easy to simplify.
So Black might willingly take on a slightly squashed position — in the Lopez, in the Hedgehog, or in the Hippopotamus — in the hope that the opponent with more space will still face difficulties in finding the right piece placements and the right plans in a tense, changeable position. As Suba pointed out, once you have your pieces arranged prettily after the opening, you still have to play chess… So, learn to love tension!

Lucky escapes

Simon Webb in his book Chess for Tigers identified the “secrets of swindling”:
(1) Be objective. The first prerequisite to a swindle is to be objective enough to realize early on when you have a lost position and start playing for a swindle while your position still has resources. If you wait until your position worsens and becomes hopeless, it will be too late.

(2) Do not be afraid of losing. “Once you’ve accepted that your position is lost, you should be in a position of psychological strength.” The worst that can happen is that you’ll lose the game. The pressure is on your opponent to win a “won game”, and it is your opponent who will be embarrassed if unable to do so.
(3) Play actively. In a losing position, you cannot passively wait for your opponent to squeeze you to death. To stand a chance of pulling off a successful swindle, it is important to get the initiative, and this may involve sacrificing a pawn or two, or even the exchange, to activate your pieces.
(4) Use the process of elimination. If you have a choice of several possible moves, and you see simple forced wins against all but one of those moves, you should play the one remaining move, and do so quickly. Again, the onus is on your opponent to find a way to win.

Swindling themes:
1 Stalemate
2 Weak back rank
3 Perpetual check
4 Surprise mating attack
5 Bishops of opposite colours
6 Material insufficiency
7 Building a fortress
8 Zugzwang
9 Timing

Wikipedia has an excellent article on swindling, in which some of those examples appear: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swindle_%28chess%29

Test paper, test positions, and suggested solutions, all attached.

The secret about dangerous openings

<p>The secret is: they’re all dangerous!</p>
<p>The great (really great) Garry Kasparov just lost in 7 moves:</p>

<p>From Leonard Barden in the Guardian:</p>

<p>

</p>

Hopes and fears

I’m going to have to wind into this one from a distance…

Mostly I play chess, but I know how to play some other games, and I’m
sort of generally interested in games in general.

Game theory was much discussed from a mathematical angle when I was in
college, but what interests me more is the thoughts and feelings of game
players, which are usually far from mathematical.

“It seems to us that the theories associated with board reconstruction
experiments represent an idealised picture of master chess which may be
misleading. … So often, as any player will agree, it is hopes and
fears which seem to influence the choice of a move.”
— Hartston and
Wason

So I was more than interested to be sent a link by our former tyrannical
landlord Steven Crane of Clifton Road Games ( http://cliftonroadgames.co.uk/ ):
https://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg%2Fdaily%2Fli%2…

Have a read of that first and see what you think.

Steven commented to me at the time:

“Probably doesn’t apply directly to chess, due to the lack of “hidden” information, but there might be something in the general idea…”

Oh, if only there was nothing hidden in chess!

“You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is clear.” Sherlock Holmes, in A Scandal in Bohemia

What is so limited in chess, is a firm grasp of what is actually there,
and what is so often present, is a paralysing fear of what our opponent
might have seen that we cannot see.

It should all be there laid on the chessboard – indeed, I often say
that’s what I like about the game – but what lies even a short way ahead
is shrouded in mist, if not fog, if not a dense curtain… and our history
of being surprised by our opponents’ replies makes us fearful of what
might happen next.

And even when we see things, we may be also be justly admonished as
was Watson on another occasion:

“Watson, you can see everything. You fail, however, to reason from what you see. ” Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle.

I found the discussion of Magic card-counting had parallels with two
discussions I had with young people who had agreed draws in these two
positions. See what you think first, then I’ll tell you what I told
them.

Black offers a draw to White: do you accept?

White offers a draw to Black: do you accept?

To put the question at all to you, suggests that there is something
better to do than shake hands and find the snack stand. An indeed there
was:


I guess I hope there might be some general sort of logic or way of feeling
about the position that would make these promising young players look a
bit harder and longer next time. I certainly found the language used
about the Magic game very familiar, even if the rules and elements were
foreign.

Don’t be afraid of ghosts, look to see what is real.

The trebuchet

In an all-parent encounter last week, the players stumbled upon this position, known as the Trebuchet. A trebuchet is a big wooden catapult, and its connection with this position is not known, except that it may catapult a player from joy to despair…

Normally, it’s an advantage for it to be your turn so you can get on with your plan, but in this position, whoever has to move next, loses! Can you see how?

The situation of an unhappy forced move is called Zugzwang; it’s not ever so common but more unusual is this situation where BOTH sides are in Zugzwang.

P.S. Interested in this sort of thing? Here are some more:
http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/simplest-mutual-full-point-zugzwangs

The Canon, 2020 edition

Some more time at home recently has meant I have been able to do something I’ve been meaning to do for ages, which is tidy up my database of teaching games, which I call the Canon.

https://devonjuniorchess.co.uk/wp/drdaveexeter/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2026/10/canon2020.pgn

Sorry if you have an earlier version and have had to tidy it yourself.

Why was it such a mess? Well, I’ve been doing this for a long while, and although the early attempts to give chessplayers some useful software were valuable, they were pretty primitive. The first version of Fritz that I owned did allow you to record, store and annotate games, but you couldn’t add variations. Then, you could add a variation, but only one at each move, so if you wanted to show multiple variations, you had to go back one move and add it there…

Also, I usually want to flag a game as being interesting for a reason — like, it’s a good Rook endgame. How do you flag a game? Well, I used to abuse the ECO code field, putting lower-case codes of my own devising in there. I also found you could add things to players’ initials. ChessBase, bless them, later added ‘medals’, so I could tag a whole bunch of games with the green ‘endgame’ medal, but then they took away the facility to add medals to multiple games at once…

And I wanted to produce chess diagrams: so they got spat out in little 8×8 arrays of text, that I could convert into nice diagrams, as long as I avoided using capital letters again…

All this over twenty years and more meant that there was a lot of crud in the database, which I hope I have cleaned up a bit.

But… there is still nowhere to add a note to a game. So… now I’m abusing the Annotator tag. If that offends you, and you use ChessBase, you can edit all the Annotator tags at once and set them to empty.

It’s in ‘new format PGN’ which means ChessBase will import it with diagrams, symbols and colours and arrows.

 

Material imbalance: Queen for Two Rooks

I have to say, if this is the aspect of your game most in need of fixing, then count yourself lucky, but there are some general lessons to be learned.

Example games:

Ish follows some theory:

Ramdewar I. – Edney R. [B76]

Kramnik wins with the Rooks:

Leko P. – Kramnik V. [C42]

Fischer wins with the Queen:

Portisch L. – Fischer R. [E45]

The Queen on the attack:

Janowsky – Lasker

The Rooks make a team:

Euwe – Rubinstein [D05]

So, what features favour the Rooks, which the Queen?

Yusupov loses to the Queen:

Jussupow A. – Shaked T. [E81]

Yusupov has another go with the Rooks:

Jussupow A. – Marjanovic S. [D34]

Chernin finds an improvement:

Chernin A. – Marjanovic S. [D34]

Ish’s game in hindsight:

Ramdewar I. – Edney R. [B76]

Click on […] to see games list.